The M&A market has been increasing since the new administration took office as of late 2015. Many regulations affecting foreign investment were removed, which has helped to turn around a declining trend in M&A activity, albeit at a slower rate than was expected by most in the business community. Recent activity has been focused mainly on the energy and finance sectors, especially fintech, and also on the agricultural sector.2

Once again, we have started to witness commercial banks and some private equity funds providing financing for M&A transactions together with a few acquirers that used international capital markets. Foreign players have increased their participation in transactions.

During the second half of the year 2018, mainly because of political, structural, internal and external issues, companies operating in capital markets greatly underperformed, and a drastic and unavoidable devaluation of the Argentine peso soon followed. Inflation skyrocketed, and the government was forced to request a loan from the IMF. The news was not well received by the population or the business community, and, therefore, devaluation and inflation gave no respite.

The first half of the year 2019 was governed by economic instability, uncertainty and expectations regarding the presidential elections causing investors to look at Argentina with higher distrust and resulting in a decrease of transactions in the M&A market.

On 8 August 2019, a primary ballot took place in Argentina where the opposition's presidential candidate had a great election result.

Immediately upon these results and given the massive transfer of dollars outside the country, which impacted on the foreign exchange rate, the incumbent administration has enacted several foreign exchange regulations. According to the outcome of the presidential elections, these regulations may be temporary.

On 27 October 2019, Alberto Fernández and his party won the presidential elections so a new scenario is expected as of 10 December 2019 with big uncertainties about future political decisions. Given the results were not like the ones of the primaries, a balanced Congress coupled with the fact that important jurisdictions remain under Macri influence, it is expected that any such decisions shall be made by consensus.


i Regulatory matters

Anti-money laundering and corruption regulations

Anti-money laundering regulations always have an impact in transactions. Argentina is one of the members of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and the FATF of Latin America and has incorporated its recommendations into its legislation. In Argentine law, money laundering is a specific criminal offence that can be imputed both to legal entities as well as natural persons. The specific authority in charge of the investigation and the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing is the Financial Information Unit, an agency responsible for issuing regulations and for monitoring compliance with money laundering, among other things. This has an impact on the financing of acquisition as, pursuant to local legislation, certain types of companies and individuals (which include financial entities, and certain government registries and agencies, among others) are required to report suspicious transactions to the Financial Information Unit and carry out 'know your customer' procedures.

These requirements are not different from those implemented by most countries, as they are very much in line with international guidelines. They do not affect debt financing any differently than what occurs in most countries, although of course the actual enforcement of these policies is always country-specific.

Through Law 27,401, a corporate criminal liability regime was introduced in Argentina, in force as of March 2018, which provides for effective collaboration agreements, and heavy fines of up to five times the undue benefit obtained by the legal entity, among other civil and administrative penalties for any bribery-related offenses as well as for irregularities in the books and records. Notwithstanding, in some cases, under this regime, companies could exempt themselves from liability if they had developed a robust anti-bribery and corruption compliance programme, considering the risk profile the companies' operations have in Argentina.

In this sense, the Anti-corruption Office, an organism responsible for the prevention and investigation of practices opposing Inter-American Convention against Corruption, has elaborated guidelines for the implementation of an adequate compliance programme, consisting in recommendations and international best practices.

The guidelines describe 13 principles as elements of the programme. They are top management's support of the programme; having an ethical code, policies and procedures of integrity; integrity in public tender processes and other interactions with the public sector; training of directors, administrators and employees; having internal whistle-blower systems; protection to whistle-blowers; internal investigations; third-party due diligence; due diligence in corporate transformation process; having a compliance officer; periodic risk assessment; and periodic monitoring and assessment of the adequacy of the programme.

Foreign exchange regulations

A major regulatory concern in any type of foreign financing is the existence of foreign exchange controls that may somehow restrict the flow of funds in and out of the country. This has always been a hot topic in Argentina, with a long history of strict controls. In this regard, Argentine law requires, as a general rule, that all transfers of foreign currency to and from the country are carried out through a licensed financial entity or a foreign exchange institution.

Recently, Communication 'A' 6770 was issued by the Argentine Central Bank. This regulation imposes certain restrictions as follows:

  1. legal entities (whether Argentinean residents or not) must obtain prior consent in order to purchase foreign currency (albeit, there are certain exemptions);
  2. loans granted by financial entities denominated in foreign currency should be converted into Argentinean pesos within five business days of the disbursement date;
  3. exports proceeds should be converted into Argentinean pesos within five days of their collection or within 180 calendar days (a term that is reduced to 15 calendar days if the export is related to commodities or with a related counterparty); and
  4. dividends payable to foreign shareholders must obtain prior consent.

It is expected that these regulations will be amended under the new administration and that new and more severe controls will be imposed as a way of protecting the dollar outflow.

ii Tax matters

The most common tax issues concern income tax and value added tax.

There are several issues affecting acquisition financing in this jurisdiction that tend to determine the viability of a transaction.

The acquisition of a company can be carried out as a stock purchase or as an asset purchase, the latter having a special procedure of transfer as an ongoing concern. Transfer of assets or transfer as an ongoing concern (the transfer of assets in bulk regulated by a special law) is taxed at 30 per cent of the value of the transferred assets, minus acquisition costs and expenses. Furthermore, VAT of 21 per cent is applied to the purchase of all movable assets, whereas certain capital goods are taxed with VAT of 10.5 per cent.

Pursuant to the Income Tax Law, the sale of shares is levied for:

  1. Argentine legal entities: at a 30 per cent income tax rate over the difference between the purchase value and the acquisition cost;
  2. Argentine individuals:
    • would be exempted as long as the transfer is: a public offer placement authorised by the Argentine Securities and Exchange Commission (CNV); made on markets authorised by the CNV (such as MAE and ROFEX) under segments that assure the time-price priority; or carried out through an acquisition or exchange public offer authorised by the CNV; and
    • if conditions set forth above are not met, the Argentine individual would be subject to a 15 per cent income tax rate over the difference between the purchase value and the acquisition cost; and
  3. Foreign shareholders:
    • if a resident of a cooperative jurisdiction3 and the funds come from a cooperative jurisdiction: (1) the foreign beneficiary would be exempted as long as the transfer is: a public offer placement authorised by the CNV; made on markets authorised by the CNV (such as MAE and ROFEX) under segments that assure the time-price priority; or is carried out through an acquisition or exchange public offer authorised by the CNV; and (2) if conditions set forth in (1) are not met, the foreign beneficiary would be subject to a 15 per cent income tax rate, which the beneficiary can choose to apply over: a 90 per cent net presumed income (thus reaching an effective 13.5 per cent rate on the gross sale price); or the effective net income, (i.e., the gross sale price less the acquisition cost); and
    • if a resident of a non-cooperative jurisdiction or the funds come from a non-cooperative jurisdiction: a 35 per cent income tax rate will apply over a 90 per cent net presumed income (thus reaching an effective 31.5 per cent rate on the gross sale price).

The tax treatment mentioned above may vary if the foreign shareholders are tax residents of a state that has a double tax treaty in force with Argentina.

In September 2018, through Decree No. 813/2018, the executive branch amended the VAT Regulatory Decree to adapt it to the last amendments introduced into the VAT Law by Law No. 27,346 and Law No. 27,430. It should be noted that according to the VAT Regulatory Decree, regarding services rendered in Argentina by foreigners, the suppliers, recipients and intermediaries will be considered Argentine residents if residence conditions set forth in income tax law are met or if they have a fixed place in Argentina. Regarding digital services that are exploited or used in Argentina and rendered by foreigners, the suppliers and intermediaries will be considered Argentine residents if residence conditions set forth in income tax law are met or if they have a fixed place in Argentina.

Stamp tax

Stamp tax is a local tax applied individually by each jurisdiction to instruments that have some sort of economic value and are either executed in Argentina or have effects in Argentina. Since each local jurisdiction is in charge of the application in its own territory, this presents a challenge when a single transaction has effects in many jurisdictions, as the transaction may be taxed differently according to the jurisdiction at hand. The stamp tax rate varies per jurisdiction but is usually between 1 and 1.5 per cent of the amount of the transaction that applies to said instrument.

There are certain exemptions and ways to mitigate this tax, for example, through the existence of special regulations that allow the consideration of payments (or exemptions) of stamp tax in other jurisdictions, or if the transaction is executed through a reversal letter mechanism. The latter is a contractual mechanism in which one party sends a written offer and establishes that it will be deemed accepted if the recipient performs a specific positive action (for example, payment or delivery of goods). This mechanism has been declared by courts as a legal contractual mechanism, and that stamp tax cannot be levied on it. However, there are certain limitations to this procedure as, for example, the mechanism for the registration of a pledge of assets in every jurisdiction sets forth the need to instrument the contract as a single agreement.

Income tax withholding

With regard to withholding tax, interest paid by Argentine companies to foreign banks or financial entities (1) under the supervision of the relevant central bank or similar governmental authority, and (2) located in: jurisdictions not listed as null or as low-tax jurisdictions by the Argentine tax authority; or jurisdictions that have signed exchange of information agreements with Argentina and have internal rules stipulating that no banking, stock market or other secrecy regulations can be applied against requests of information by Argentina's tax authorities, are subject to a 15.05 per cent withholding tax over gross payments (17.7163 per cent if the Argentine payer agrees to bear the withholding tax himself or herself).

Interest paid by Argentine companies for the import of movable assets (except automobiles) is also subject to a 15.05 per cent withholding tax over gross payments (17.7163 per cent if the Argentine payer agrees to bear the withholding tax himself or herself) provided that the loan was granted by the supplier.

In case of any other interest payment to foreign beneficiaries, a 35 per cent withholding tax rate applies over gross payments (53.8462 per cent if the Argentine payer agrees to bear the withholding tax himself or herself).

However, the tax treatment mentioned above may vary if the interest payment is made to tax residents of states that have a double tax treaty in force with Argentina. Finally, no withholding tax applies on principal repayments.

Debit and credit tax

This tax is levied on debits and credits in bank accounts held at Argentine financial institutions. Additionally, all transfers of funds are subject to this tax, when made using organised payment systems in lieu of those local accounts. The general tax rate is 0.6 per cent for debits and credits, and 1.2 per cent when the transfer of funds is made through organised payment systems in lieu of local accounts (currently being 33 per cent of this tax paid computable by the taxpayer against income tax). There are several exemptions applicable to finance transactions, including debits relating to time deposits, credits relating to loans granted by banks, and credits or debits relating to advances of discount operations.


The most common types of security are mortgages, pledges of shares, pledges of assets and security trusts (over assets or over debtor's cash flow). A mortgage is straightforward, with the underlying collateral usually being the real estate used by the acquired entity to carry out its business, as this will compromise its activities in case of default and thus provides an incentive for the debtor to repay. The pledge of assets is very similar, with creditors usually requiring that the underlying collateral be the assets utilised for production. The resale value in case of foreclosure of the asset pledge can be tricky, as many assets can be hard to sell.

Another security used by lenders in certain transactions has been an assignment into a security trust of the target cash flows (i.e., assignment of receivables). In recent years, the use of this vehicle has increased drastically, mainly owing to the excessive onerousness and complex foreclosure of other types of securities. Under the security trust, the fiduciary title of certain assets (which can be any type of assets) is transferred to a trustee (who is to be determined by contract) so that he or she can liquidate these assets in order to satisfy a credit, subject to the occurrence of certain conditions, most commonly the default of the debtor.

Even though security trusts have been utilised in Argentina for many years, they were not expressly regulated until the last reform of the Argentine Civil and Commercial Code in August 2015. Prior to the enactment of this law, the National Supreme Court of Justice, in 2003, declared the security trust as valid. Nonetheless, the lack of express regulation generated a lot of discussion in the legal community over the scope of the security trust, primarily under scenarios of insolvency. Discussions have involved whether:

  1. a creditor would have to participate or not in a hypothetical bankruptcy or reorganisation proceeding of the debtor (since the assets are held in trust); or
  2. the need for a creditor guaranteed by a security trust to verify the credit under the bankruptcy or reorganisation proceeding of a debtor (as a creditor).

Also, there is certain case law in which the effects of a security trust over the debtor's cash flow was terminated for the sole reason that without said flow the debtor will not be able to reorganise without this cash flow. This will not happen with a pledge or a mortgage.

Regrettably, the Argentine Civil and Commercial Code regulated the security trust, but omitted to address the above-mentioned issues, so the discussion persists.

One important guaranty that lenders should always try to get is personal guaranties from the owners. This is not easy to obtain, but generally in a stress scenario personal guaranties are a good leverage tool to renegotiate terms.


Priorities in an insolvency procedure depend on the very nature of the existing debt. Privileges are ruled only by the Argentine Bankruptcy Law (ABL) and are detailed between Articles 239 and 250 of the ABL. Below is a chart describing priorities of claims.

Type of credit Description Scope Detail of the assets over which the privilege can be exercised
Expenses reserve Expenses necessary for the bidding process of the bankruptcy assets (Article 244 ABL) Expenses Over the assets of the bidding
Special privilege Construction, improvement and conservation of a thing or asset (Article 241, Section 1) Principal of credit (Article 242 ABL) Over the thing, asset or subject of the improvement or construction (after paying 'expense reserve')
Credits for remuneration owed to an employee for six months, and those coming from severance payments, accidents, years of service or dismissal, lack of prior notice and the unemployment fund (Article 241, Section 2) Principal of credit plus interest for two years counting from the time of the due date (Article 242, Section 1 ABL) Over merchandise, raw materials and machinery that are property of the insolvent and are located in the establishment where services were rendered (after paying an 'expense reserve')
Taxes and fees applied over certain assets (Article 241, Section 3) Principal of credit Over certain assets (after paying an 'expense reserve')
Mortgage, security interest (Article 241, Section 4) Principal of credit plus costs and interests for two years prior to the bankruptcy and compensatory interests after the bankruptcy until effective payment (Article 242, Section 2 ABL) Over the assets granted as subject matter of the relevant mortgage (after paying 'expense reserve')
Debts owed to the withholder for withholding certain things (Article 241, Section 5) Principal of credit Over the retained thing (after paying an 'expense reserve')
Others (Article 241, Section 6), in other words, the Navigation Law or the Customs Code Principal of credit After paying an 'expense reserve'
Justice and conservation expenses All expenses derived from the conservation of the assets (Article 240 ABL) Expense Over all assets (after paying an 'expense reserve')
General labour privilege Credits for payments and family subsidies owed to workers for six months and those coming from severance, work-related accidents, years of service or dismissal, lack of prior notice, vacations, 13th salary, unemployment fund, and any other credit related to the employee–worker relationship (Article 246, Section 1 ABL) Principal of credit plus interests for two years from the due date and judicial expenses (if applicable) Over all assets (after paying an 'expense reserve', 'special privilege' and 'conservation expenses')
General privilege Payments owed to national, provincial or municipal social security organisms, family subsidies and unemployment fund (Article 246, Section 2) Principal of credit 50 per cent of all assets (after paying an 'expense reserve', 'special privilege', 'conservation expenses' and 'general labour privilege') (Article 247 ABL)
Taxes and fees owed to national, provincial or municipal tax organisms (Article 246(4)) Principal of credit 50 per cent of all assets (after paying an 'expense reserve', 'special privilege', 'conservation expenses' and 'general labour privilege') (Article 247 ABL)
Unsecured creditors All credit without privilege Capital and interests 50 per cent of all assets (after paying an 'expense reserve', 'special privilege', 'conservation expenses' and 'general labour privilege') (Article 247 ABL) and remaining assets (after paying the general privilege)


i Choice of forum

The Civil and Commercial Code of Argentina allows the parties to an international agreement to select the jurisdiction of either an arbitration tribunal acting abroad or a foreign court, for the settlement of disputes that arise under such agreement. Furthermore, the courts of Argentina have exclusive jurisdiction over insolvency procedures related to debtors who are domiciled in Argentina. With regards to the right to be heard in court, the Constitution of Argentina grants unlimited access to all people, foreign or nationals to have their disputes resolved by a court of law. Argentine courts also recognise procedures of Argentine debtors that have taken place abroad as long as the foreign country recognises reciprocity.

ii Enforcement of arbitration awards and foreign judgments

As a general principle, Argentine courts will recognise both arbitration awards rendered abroad and foreign judgments.

In the absence of a treaty for the enforcement of foreign judgments, the National Code of Civil and Commercial Procedure will be applied to the enforcement of foreign judgments if the matter at hand is decided before a federal court or if the defendant is domiciled in the City of Buenos Aires. In matters decided before provincial courts, provincial procedural rules will apply. Argentine courts will enforce foreign judgments subject to the fulfilment of the following requirements:

  1. the judgment was final and issued by a competent court of law, according to Argentine conflict of laws principles regarding jurisdiction;
  2. the judgment was valid in accordance with the law of the jurisdiction where it was rendered;
  3. the defendant was personally summoned and granted due process, in accordance with Argentine legislation;
  4. the judgment must not be in conflict with a prior or simultaneous judgment of an Argentine court; and
  5. the judgment must not be contrary to any of the public policy principles of Argentine law.

Regarding arbitration proceedings, domestic awards may be enforced as any domestic court's final decision (through summary enforcement proceedings). As for foreign awards, international commercial arbitration is governed by the new International Commercial Arbitration Law, in force since August 2018, which mainly follows the guidelines of the UNCITRAL Model Law. Under the International Commercial Arbitration Law, an arbitral award, irrespective of the country in which it was made, shall be recognised as binding and, upon application in writing to the competent court, shall be enforced subject to the provisions of Sections 102 to 105.

However, recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award may be refused:

  1. at the request of the party against whom it is invoked, if that party furnishes to the court proof that: (1) a party to the arbitration agreement was under some incapacity, or the agreement is not valid; (2) the party against whom the award is invoked was not given proper notice or was otherwise unable to present his or her case; (3) the award deals with a dispute not contemplated by or not falling within the terms of the submission to arbitration; (4) the arbitral procedure was not in accordance with the agreement of the parties, or – failing agreement – was not in accordance with the law of the country where the arbitration took place; and (5) the award has not yet become binding or has been set aside or suspended; or
  2. if the court finds that: (1) the subject-matter of the dispute is not capable of settlement by arbitration under Argentine law (under Section 1651 of the National Civil and Commercial Code, civil status or capacity of persons, family matters, consumers cases, adhesion contracts and labour disputes cannot be submitted to arbitration); or (2) the recognition or enforcement of the award would be contrary to public policy under Argentine law.

Furthermore, with regard to arbitration awards, and subject to Section 1656 of the National Civil and Commercial Code, parties cannot waive their right to judicially challenge an arbitral award when it is contrary to Argentine law. However, courts have reasonably come to construe that the extent of the waiver applies only to arbitration awards that violate public policy, deny due process, resolve matters not submitted to arbitration, or the award is rendered out of the term agreed for its issuance.


Public takeovers and mergers of listed companies are regulated by Law No. 26,831(as regulated by Decree No. 1023/2013 and amended by the Productive Financing Law No. 27,440, among others) and the rules of the CNV – especially Resolution No. 779/2018 (the Resolution). Consequently, prior approval of the CNV, as enforcement authority, is required. Additionally, it may also be necessary to obtain approval from other governmental entities (for example, the Argentine Central Bank and the Anti-Trust Authority), depending on the circumstances involved and the business activities of the company.

Under Argentine legislation, a public takeover occurs when a human or legal person, acting individually or in concert, offers to acquire or exchange shares with voting rights of a listed company for a certain term under certain terms and conditions. The CNV has strongly regulated the scope of 'acting in concert' for the purpose of this definition.

Tender offers in Argentina may be classified under three different types: (1) the voluntary tender offer; (2) the 'strictly speaking' mandatory tender offer, that is required to be made by a person who reached a participation in the control of the target company, under the terms of the CNV Rules; and (3) the squeeze-out tender offer, triggered when a human or legal person, either directly or through another or other companies controlled by third parties, holds 95 per cent or more of the capital stock of the target company. Additionally, when a listed company is willing to delist, it is also mandatory to launch a tender offering.

According to the Resolution, no mandatory partial tender offer is required in the event of an acquisition of a significant participation in the capital stock of a listed target company, provided that it does not imply the acquisition of a controlling interest in the target company.

The participation in the control of the target company is basically met when: (1) the scope of the offering, directly or indirectly, reaches a number of shares that represents a percentage equal to or greater than 50 per cent of the shares with voting rights of the target company; or (2) the offeror holds a number of shares that represents less than 50 per cent of the shares with voting rights of the target company but acts as a controlling party in accordance with Law No. 27,440.

The voluntary tender offer may not aim to buy the total amount of outstanding shares of the target company and may not duly comply with the payment of an equal price per share for all the shareholders. However, in a mandatory tender offer, the offer to purchase must represent 100 per cent of the shares with voting rights, subscription rights, stock warrants or stock options, convertible securities or other similar instruments of the target company (regardless of the percentage of the shares that will actually be purchased at the end of the process) and must respect an equal price per share for all the shareholders. Several CNV rules establish the requirements for an equal price, which must be followed.

The CNV rules provide that a mandatory tender offer is required to be made by the party that has effectively reached the control of a target listed company: (1) through the voting shares, subscription rights, stock warrants or stock options, convertible securities or other similar instruments of the target company that are entitled to own or buy shares; (2) through agreements with other holders of securities that, in a concerted manner, ensure the necessary votes to form the corporate will in ordinary meetings or to elect or revoke the majority of the board members; and (3) indirectly or as a result of a corporate reorganisation process.

Before making a tender offer, it is advisable to enter into negotiations with the key shareholders of the target company, always in compliance with the target company's by-laws and applicable regulations. Once the requirements for a mandatory tender offer have been complied or once it has been decided to formulate a voluntary tender offer, the target company must file with the CNV an announcement disclosing the main terms of the offer, the before mentioned agreements and the highest price of the shares during the 12 month-period prior to the offer, among other things.

In order to obtain said prior approval of the CNV it is necessary to file an application with a prospectus stating the main terms of the offer as well as certain financial and company information.


Due to political issues, the economic performance has suffered a severe recession coupled with an inflation rate that affected investment in the country.

As explained above, exchange control regulations were imposed with a view to stop the transfer of dollars out of the country and specially to gain stability on foreign exchange rate. The requirement of Central Bank authorisation to pay dividends will not help to bring foreign investment, based on past history. The current administration has said that these measures were temporary in order to stabilise the economy. It is expected that the new administration will continue this regime or even reinforce some of the restrictions.

It is worth mentioning the development of the judicial case, informally known as the 'Notebook Scandal', where the investigation has unveiled the participation of multiple business people and members of the previous administration in bribes and corruption in order to be appointed adjudicators of administrative contracts. The case continues to have a huge impact on the economic and political aspects of the country. If confirmed, it would imply the existence of a corrupt system in force during 12 years of government. For the first time, politicians and businessmen were imprisoned over a corruption scheme. In addition, the current administration was able to reduce the cost of public works significantly by changing suppliers and imposing more transparent procedures.


Among the various drafts of laws or administrative regulations that could affect the leverage of M&A activity under discussion, the following can be mentioned:

  1. CNV Resolution 742/2018, which will turn enforce the stated new regime implemented by Law No. 27,440;
  2. the Asset Recovery Bill, which will facilitate the decommission of assets obtained illegally by means of corruption, narcotrafficking and money laundering. As of September 2018, the Asset Recovery Bill was approved by Argentina's Lower House of Congress. If enacted into law, it would provide for an autonomous judicial action in order to confiscate any assets or proceeds that are a product directly or indirectly of illicit activity;
  3. the Public Ethics Bill, which would effect several changes on the current system, and is aimed at preventing public officials from taking advantage of public office to make a profit personally or through family members; and
  4. the bill to amend the National Civil and Commercial Procedural Code and the National Civil and Commercial Code, which will modify aspects of the arbitration agreement, particularly, aspects related to precautionary measures, review of arbitration awards and optional clauses.


1 Tomás Allende is a partner at Beccar Varela. The author wishes to thank Marina Heinrich, Andres Schreiber, Maria Ines Cappelletti, Lujan Calliaci and Victoria Rabasa for their contribution.

2 TTR Blog made a report that shows that M&A activity for the first half of 2019 was US$2.342 million and 65 operations. This shows a decrease of 55.91 per cent in the amount and a decrease of 45.38 per cent in the number of operations in comparison with the same period of 2018. TTR Blog; 'Informe Argentina 2T2019'; 2019 (available at: https://blog.ttrecord.com/informe-argentina-2t-2019/).

3 Non-cooperative jurisdictions are countries or jurisdictions without exchange of information with Argentina (i.e., there is no exchange of information treaty or double tax treaty with a broad clause of exchange of information between this country and Argentina, or there is no effective exchange of information although this kind of treaty is in force. The list of 'non-cooperative countries' should be determined by the executive branch following such parameters (still pending for 2019). However, through Section 7 of Decree No. 279/2018 (published in the Official Gazette on 9 April 2018), the executive branch established that, until the list of 'non cooperative countries' is regulated, the list of 'cooperative countries' in force for 2017 must be considered (available at: www.afip.gob.ar/jurisdiccionesCooperantes/#ver).