The Indian economy has witnessed a gradual recovery from 5.6 per cent gross domestic product (GDP) growth in 2012 to 2013 to 6.7 per cent growth in 2017 to 2018.2 It is forecast to reach 7.3 per cent in 2018 to 2019.3 According to the annual report published by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), for 2017 to 2018 there were 201 initial public offerings (IPOs), whereas in the previous year there were 105, depicting an increase of 91.4 per cent. Proceeds raised through IPOs in 2017 to 2018 nearly tripled to 836.84 billion rupees as compared with 290.78 billion rupees in 2016 to 2017.4 Further, 31 out of the 45 IPOs on the main board raised 770.88 billion rupees, with an issue size of 5 billion rupees or more.5
The companies recently listed on the stock exchanges in India were from diverse sectors, such as consumer services, healthcare, hotels, airlines, food and beverages, entertainment, footwear, textile and insurance, as opposed to the previous trend, where only companies in certain sectors, such as banking, finance and information technology, would contemplate undertaking an IPO.
SEBI recently notified the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations 2018 (the ICDR Regulations), which superseded the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations 2009 (the ICDR 2009) in their entirety. This was done to, among other things, align the provisions of the ICDR Regulations with the Companies Act 2013, as amended (the Companies Act 2013), simplify the language and the structure of the ICDR Regulations, and separate the chapters based on the type of offering. The ICDR Regulations came into force in November 2018.
An IPO in India may comprise a fresh issuance of securities, an offer for sale of securities by the existing holders of securities or a combination of both. Further, an issuer proposing to list its securities on the stock exchanges in India may opt to list on the Main Board, the SME Exchange or the Institutional Trading Platform. The SME Exchange is a trading platform of a recognised stock exchange having nationwide terminals permitted by SEBI but does not include the Main Board. The Institutional Trading Platform is a trading platform for listing and trading of specified securities of entities that comply with the eligibility criteria laid down by SEBI. This chapter will be limited to the listing of equity shares on the Main Board as issuers predominantly opt to list on the Main Board in India.
II GOVERNING RULES
i Main stock exchanges
The two primary stock exchanges in India are BSE Limited (BSE) and the National Stock Exchange of India Limited (NSE).
BSE was established in 1875 and was the first stock exchange in Asia and the fastest stock exchange in the world with a speed of six microseconds.6 BSE provides a platform for trading in equities, currencies, debt instruments, derivatives and mutual funds, as well as trading in equities of small and medium-sized enterprises. The SME platform targets small and medium-sized enterprises whose post-issue face value capital is less than or equal to 250 million rupees, and post issue paid-up capital is less than or equal to 100 million rupees. The S&P SENSEX of BSE is the benchmark, market-weighted index that monitors the performance of the 30 largest, most liquid and financially sound companies across crucial sectors of the Indian economy, listed at BSE.7
NSE began operations in 1994 and is the leading stock exchange in India and the second largest in the world by the number of trades in equity shares from January 2018 to June 2018.8 NSE provides a platform for trading in equity and equity-linked products, including mutual funds and institutional placement programmes, and trading in derivatives and debt. The key index of NSE is NIFTY 50. It monitors the performance of stocks of 50 companies accounting for 12 sectors of the economy.9
It is essential for the entities that wish to list on the stock exchanges in India to conform and comply with initial listing and continued listing requirements under the uniform listing agreement, the ICDR Regulations, as amended, and the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations 2015, as amended (the Listing Regulations).
The regulatory framework in India does not recognise the concept of dual listing. The securities laws as well as company laws will have to be overhauled to facilitate dual listing.
ii Overview of listing requirements
Any issuer proposing to undertake an IPO is required to comply with certain independent requirements of the relevant stock exchange on which it intends to list its equity shares as well as the eligibility requirements laid down by SEBI in the ICDR Regulations and the Listing Regulations. In addition, the issuer must also comply with the Companies Act 2013 read along with the rules thereto, the Securities Contract (Regulation) Act 1956 and the Securities Contract (Regulation) Rules 1957, each as occasionally amended, and the foreign investment laws in India.
The minimum percentage of equity shares required to be offered to the public in an IPO by the issuer is as follows:
- at least 25 per cent of each class of equity shares must be offered to the public, if the post-IPO equity share capital of the issuer is less than or equal to 16 billion rupees;
- a percentage of equity shares equivalent to 4 billion rupees must be offered to the public, if the post-IPO equity share capital of the issuer is more than 16 billion rupees but less than or equal to 40 billion rupees; and
- at least 10 per cent of each class of equity shares must be offered to the public, if the post-IPO equity share capital of the issuer is more than 40 billion rupees.
Companies that fall under points (b) and (c) are required to increase their public shareholding to at least 25 per cent within three years of the date the securities are listed.
Requirements for undertaking an IPO
The issuer must meet certain criteria laid down by SEBI to undertake an IPO, including the following:
- it must have net tangible assets of at least 30 million rupees calculated on a restated and consolidated basis, in each of the preceding three full years (of 12 months each), of which not more than 50 per cent are held in monetary assets;
- it must have an average operating profit of at least 150 million rupees, calculated on a restated and consolidated basis, during the preceding three years (of 12 months each) with operating profit in each of these preceding three years;
- it must have a net worth of at least 10 million rupees in each of the preceding three full years (of 12 months each) calculated on a restated and consolidated basis;
- if it has changed its name within the past year, it must have earned at least 50 per cent of the revenue, calculated on a restated and consolidated basis, for the preceding full year from the activity indicated by the new name;
- the issuer, its promoters, promoter group, directors or selling shareholders should not be debarred from accessing the capital markets by SEBI; however, the restriction is not applicable if the period of debarment is already over at the time of filing the draft offer document;
- the promoters or directors were not or are not also promoters or directors of any other company that is debarred from accessing the capital market under any order or directions of SEBI; however, the restriction is not applicable if the period of debarment is already over at the time of filing the draft offer document;
- the issuer, its promoters and directors should not be categorised as wilful defaulters by any bank or financial institution or consortium thereof, in accordance with the guidelines on wilful defaulters issued by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI);
- all existing partly paid equity shares of the issuer have been either fully paid up or forfeited; and
- any of the promoters or directors of the issuer should not be categorised as a fugitive economic offender under the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act 2018.
If the issuer does not satisfy the criteria specified in points (a) to (d), it may undertake an IPO through the book-building process, wherein at least 75 per cent of the net offer to the public must be compulsorily allotted to qualified institutional buyers, failing which, the subscription monies must be refunded and the IPO fails.
Further, in terms of the ICDR Regulations, an issuer cannot undertake an IPO if there are any outstanding convertible securities or any other rights that would entitle any person listing any option to receive equity shares.
At least 20 per cent of the post-issue paid-up capital held by the promoters is required to be locked in for three years. The remaining shareholding of the promoters and all other shareholders is subject to a one-year lock-in period from the date of allotment in the IPO. This, however, is not applicable to equity shares (1) allotted to employees, both current and past, under any stock option scheme prior to the IPO; (2) held by or transferred to an employee stock option trust pursuant to exercise of options by the employees, both current and past; or (3) held by a venture capital fund or alternative investment fund of category I or category II or a foreign venture capital investor.
If the post-issue shareholding is less than 20 per cent, alternate investment funds, foreign venture capital investors, scheduled commercial banks, public financial institutions or Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India-registered insurance companies may contribute for the purpose of meeting the shortfall in minimum contribution as specified for the promoters, subject to a maximum of 10 per cent of the post-issue capital of the issuer without being identified as a promoter.
The 20 per cent lock-in requirement is not applicable if the issuer does not have any identifiable promoters.
SEBI may also reject the draft offer document in accordance with the ICDR Regulations and Securities and Exchange Board of India (Framework for Rejection of Draft Offer Documents) Order 2012 on various grounds, such as:
- the ultimate promoters are unidentifiable;
- the purpose for which the funds are being raised is vague;
- the business model of the issuer is exaggerated, complex or misleading, and the investors may be unable to assess risks associated with such business models;
- there is a sudden spurt in business before the filing of the draft offer document and replies to the clarification sought are not satisfactory; or
- outstanding litigation that is so major that the issuer's survival is dependent on the outcome of the pending litigation.
iii Overview of law and regulations
SEBI was established in 1992 in accordance with the provisions of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act 1992, as amended. SEBI is an autonomous body established to protect the interests of investors in securities and to promote the development of, and to regulate, the securities market and connected matters.
The ICDR Regulations, issued by SEBI, contain detailed provisions governing the IPO and provide detailed guidelines in relation to:
- disclosure requirements;
- formats of the various due diligence certificates to be provided by the merchant bankers appointed for the IPO;
- eligibility requirements;
- publicity guidelines;
- the method for undertaking the IPO, including the opening and closing of the issuance; and
- conditions relating to pricing in IPOs.
In addition to the ICDR Regulations, the Listing Regulations, issued by SEBI, cover principles, common obligations and continued disclosure requirements for all entities that have already been listed on any of the stock exchanges in the country. The Listing Regulations also lay down all the conditions of corporate governance to be followed by a listed entity.
When an entity is undertaking an IPO, it is required to comply with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations 2015 (the Insider Trading Regulations) and SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations 2011 (the Takeover Regulations), each as occasionally amended. The Insider Trading Regulations, which were notified in January 2015, have widened the scope of insider trading regulations in India by making it applicable to entities that are proposed to be listed. In terms of the Insider Trading Regulations, no issuer is permitted to communicate, provide or allow access to any unpublished price-sensitive information relating to a company whose securities are listed or proposed to be listed, or any person, including other insiders except where such communication is in furtherance of legitimate purposes, performance of duties or discharge of legal obligations. When an investor is investing in equity shares of the issuer, it must ensure that the acquisition does not attract the provisions of the Takeover Regulations.
In addition, an entity is required to comply with, among others, disclosure requirements specified under the Companies Act 2013 read along with the relevant rules thereunder. The entity is also required to comply with the various circulars and guidelines occasionally issued by the RBI in relation to the foreign investment. The transfer of shares between an Indian resident and a non-resident does not require prior approval of the relevant governmental authorities, provided that activities of the investee company are under the automatic route under the foreign direct investment policy and do not attract the provisions of the Takeover Regulations; the non-resident shareholding is within the sectoral limits under the foreign direct investment policy; and the pricing is in accordance with the guidelines prescribed by the relevant governmental authorities such as SEBI and RBI.
III THE OFFERING PROCESS
i General overview of the IPO process
An IPO process in India typically takes seven to nine months. However, the timeline may vary depending upon factors such as the complexities involved in the transaction, including restructuring of the issuer, preparation of pro forma financial statements if the issuer has acquired or divested business recently, compliance with law, receipt of all necessary regulatory approvals and other market conditions.
The key parties involved in an IPO process are as follows.
The issuer is required to appoint at least one or more merchant bankers, registered under the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Merchant Bankers) Regulations 1992, and at least one of them must be the lead merchant banker. SEBI holds the merchant bankers primarily responsible for ensuring compliance with the disclosure requirements and other rules relating to the IPO process. The issuer can file the offer documents with SEBI only through a merchant banker.
Indian legal counsel to the issuer undertakes legal due diligence, advises on the Indian laws applicable to the issuer and the IPO, and assists in drafting the non-business sections of the offer document. Merchant bankers typically appoint a separate law firm to act as their Indian legal counsel in the transaction.
International legal counsel undertakes legal due diligence, advises on international legal and regulatory issues relating to offer, sale and distribution of shares, and assists in drafting the business-related sections of the offer document in larger transactions.
Auditors audit and restate the issuer's financial statements for inclusion in the offer document. They verify and certify the accuracy of the financial statements presented in the offer document, and also issue 'comfort letters' to the merchant bankers at various stages in the IPO process.
Registrar to the IPO
The registrar to the IPO is required to accept application forms from the investors in the IPO; process application forms; and coordinate the process for allotment of equity shares and refund of subscription monies where equity shares are not allotted to the investor.
Designated intermediaries are entities that are authorised to collect the application forms from investors intending to subscribe in the IPO. Designated intermediaries include the merchant bankers, syndicate members, collecting depository participants, sub-syndicates or agents, self-certified syndicated banks (SCSBs), registrar and share agents, and registered brokers.
Sponsor banks are bankers to the issue registered with SEBI and have been recently introduced to effectuate a Unified Payments Interface (UPI) as a payment mechanism for bids submitted by Retail Individual Investors (RIIs) through intermediaries. They are appointed by the issuer and are responsible for (1) initiating a mandate request (i.e., requesting the RIIs to authorise blocking of funds that is equivalent to their application amount), (2) receiving status of block request from the RII and sharing it with the stock exchanges, and (3) ensuring subsequent debit of funds to the issuer's account in the case of allotment.
An advertising agency is responsible for the publicity-related activities regarding the IPO, and also provides the necessary information to the merchant bankers to enable them to submit a compliance certificate to SEBI.
The ICDR Regulations require that if the issue size of the IPO (excluding the offer for sale by selling shareholders) exceeds 1 billion rupees, the issuer is required to ensure that the utilisation of IPO proceeds is monitored by a public financial institution or by one of the scheduled commercial banks named in the offer document as the banker of the issuer. The monitoring agency will be required to submit its report to the issuer in the format specified in the ICDR Regulations on a quarterly basis until at least 95 per cent of the proceeds of the issue (excluding the proceeds raised for general corporate purposes) have been utilised.
Brief overview of the timelines for the listing process
Below is a brief step-by-step overview of the listing process in India.
|Step No.||Particulars||Timelines (due date)|
|1||Kick-off meeting and commencement of due diligence process.||T-120|
|2||The legal counsels along with the help of the issuer and the merchant bankers conduct the due diligence of the issuer and prepare the draft offer document.||T-90|
|3||Execution of offer agreement and registrar agreement: the offer agreement between the merchant bankers and the issuer sets out the mutual rights, obligations and liabilities relating to the IPO. It sets out, among others, the roles and responsibilities of the merchant bankers, the conditions precedent to the merchant bankers' obligations, representations and warranties from the issuer and merchant bankers, details of the indemnity provided by the issuer to the merchant bankers, and provisions for termination of the merchant bankers' engagement. If the IPO has an offer for sale component, the selling shareholder is also a party to the offer agreement. The registrar agreement sets out the duties of the registrar and the responsibilities of the issuer and the registrar regarding each other.||T|
|4||Filing of the draft offer document (Draft Red Herring Prospectus (DRHP)) with SEBI.||T|
|5||The DRHP filed with SEBI is made public for comment for at least 21 days of the date of the filing, by hosting it on the websites of SEBI, recognised stock exchanges where specified securities are proposed to be listed and the merchant bankers associated with the IPO.||T+21|
|6||Receipt of in-principle approval from the stock exchanges.||T+21–25|
|7||Receipt of SEBI final observations:1 SEBI must provide observations or changes to be made to the DRHP within 30 days of (1) the date of receipt of the DRHP; (2) the date of receipt of satisfactory reply from the merchant bankers, where SEBI has sought any clarification or additional information from them; (3) the date of receipt of clarification or information from any regulator or agency, where SEBI has sought any clarification or information from such regulator or agency; or (4) the date of receipt of a copy of the in-principle approval letter issued by the stock exchanges.||T+45|
|8||Filing of the updated DRHP with SEBI.||T+55|
|9||Grant of SEBI approval for filing with the relevant Registrar of Companies (RoC).||T+57|
|10||Execution of the syndicate agreement, the share escrow agreement2 and the cash escrow agreement: the syndicate agreement sets out the roles and obligations of, and the relationship between, the merchant bankers and the other banks in the underwriting syndicate. This agreement lists out the role and obligations of each syndicate member. The issuer and the selling shareholders, if any, are confirming parties to the syndicate agreement. The cash escrow agreement sets out the arrangement for collection of application or bid amount from anchor investors. This agreement is entered into among the issuer, the merchant bankers, the syndicate members, the escrow collection banks and the registrar (and the selling shareholders, in the case of an offer for sale). This agreement also provides for the arrangement by which the funds in the escrow accounts are transferred to the refund account or the public issue account, as applicable. The share escrow agreement sets out the terms whereby the selling shareholders agree to place their respective offered shares in escrow in accordance with the terms of that agreement.||T+57|
|11||Filing of the Red Herring Prospectus (RHP) with the RoC.3||T+58|
|12||Grant of approval by RoC.||T+59|
|13||Publication of the price band advertisement.4||T+60|
|14||Transfer of shares from the selling shareholder account to the public issue account bank.||T+61|
|15||Opening of the IPO.5,6||T+62|
|16||Closing of the IPO.7||T+65|
|17||Filing of the Prospectus with RoC.||T+66|
|18||Execution of the underwriting agreement: an IPO must be underwritten by merchant bankers and their respective syndicate members for which purpose the underwriting agreement is entered into by the merchant bankers, the syndicate members and the issuer, on the pricing date. Underwriting agreements for Indian IPOs contain provisions such as representations and warranties, covenants, termination provisions and indemnities. The underwriting in Indian IPOs is usually a 'soft underwriting' as primarily the issuer offers securities directly to potential investors and underwriters commit to purchase securities that remain unsubscribed after the pricing process is complete and the minimum subscription has been received.*||T+67|
|19||Finalisation of the basis of allotment.*||T+68|
|20||Allotment of shares to the applicants and credit of funds to the public issue account bank.*||T+69|
|21||Application for final listing and trading approvals with the stock exchange or exchanges.*||T+70|
|22||Commencement of listing and trading.*||T+71|
'* Pursuant to a recent circular, SEBI has reduced the duration of the period between issue closure to listing from six to three working days. This change will be implemented over the course of three phases, effective from January 2019. While Phase I and Phase II will continue to operate with the existing T+6 timelines, Phase III will operate with the T+3 timeline. However, SEBI is yet to notify the timelines for Phase III.
SEBI has mandated that all investors (except anchor investors) applying in an IPO are required to only use the Application Supported by Blocked Amount (ASBA) facility for making payment. In the ASBA mechanism, the application money is blocked in the bank account provided in the application form until just prior to the allotment, or withdrawal or failure of the IPO, or withdrawal or rejection of the application, as the case may be. If the bid is successful, the monies are transferred from the bank account to the public offer account opened by the issuer. SEBI, in its effort to reduce the timeline for the period between issue closure and listing, has mandated the gradual discontinuation of the existing process of physical movement of application forms from intermediaries to SCSBs for blocking of funds for applications by RIIs through intermediaries. Instead, all applications submitted by RIIs to the intermediaries have to be through ASBA with UPI as a payment mechanism. For public issues, UPI will allow the facility to block funds at the time of making an application.
ii Pitfalls and considerations
As highlighted earlier, SEBI may reject a draft offer document if it has reasonable ground to believe that, inter alia, the ultimate promoters are unidentifiable, the purpose for which the funds are being raised is vague or there is an outstanding litigation that is so major that the issuer's survival is dependent on the outcome of the pending litigation. Accordingly, the issuer must ensure that it does not trigger any rejection criteria prior to the filing of the draft offer document, as issuers whose draft offer documents are rejected are not allowed to access capital markets for at least one year from the date of such rejection, and the period may be increased depending on the materiality of the omission and commission. In addition, SEBI may initiate an action against the merchant bankers or the issuer, in accordance with applicable law.
In addition, the issuer is required to provide detailed disclosures in relation to the purpose for which the funds are being raised, including, among others, the schedule of implementation, deployment of funds, sourcing of financing of funds already deployed, details of all material existing, or anticipated transactions in relation to utilisation of the issue proceeds or project cost with promoters, directors, key management personnel, associates and group companies of the issuer. Further, the amount for general corporate purposes cannot exceed 25 per cent of the amount raised by the issuer through the issuance of specified securities. Accordingly, an issuer is not permitted to create war chests and must provide detailed disclosures in the offer document. Additionally, an issuer is not permitted to recoup its costs from the amount raised pursuant to the IPO. If there is a variation in objects, an exit offer shall be made by the promoters or shareholders in control of an issuer to the dissenting shareholders in terms of the Companies Act 2013 and the ICDR Regulations.
Identification of promoters has become increasingly complex in recent years owing to the increase in investment by financial and strategic investors. While certain financial and strategic investors have majority shareholding and nominee directors on the board of the issuer, these investors may not be identified as promoters given the nature of the investment in the issuer, and certain other considerations such as lack of involvement in the day-to-day business activities of the issuer. Identification of promoters is subjective and must be dealt with case by case. For example, the issuer would have to check whether (1) any entity has been identified as a promoter in any licences, borrowings, material agreements such as the shareholders' agreements, regulatory or corporate filings; (2) any entity controls management or policy decisions; (3) any entity is entitled to control the decisions of the board of the issuer; or (4) any entity is entitled to appoint the majority of directors of the issuer. Once the issuer identifies the promoter, extensive disclosures about the promoter are required to be included in the offer document. This includes legal proceedings involving the promoters, and the source of funds from which the securities of the issuer were purchased. In addition, if the promoter is an individual, details such as date of birth, age, educational qualifications, experience, past positions held and other directorships are required to be provided. If the promoter is a company, details such as a brief history of the promoter, date of incorporation, change in activities, present activities, names of the natural persons in control of the promoter and details of change of management of the promoter have to be provided.
Further, in terms of stock exchange requirements, no single shareholder should be accorded any special rights when the issuer is undergoing an IPO. Accordingly, all special rights granted to a permanent shareholder are required to fall away at the time of listing of equity shares in the relevant stock exchanges. This leads to a fair amount of discussion with the financial, private or strategic investors who prefer to retain a seat on the board of directors of the issuer or certain policy, operational and information covenants, if the investor continues to retain a significant shareholding after the listing of the equity shares of the issuer.
Until recently, if a selling shareholder held convertible securities and intended to offer equity shares in the IPO, it was required to convert all the convertible securities into equity shares prior to filing of the DRHP to offer such equity shares for sale in the IPO. It usually takes four to six months from the date of filing of the DRHP to list equity shares on the recognised stock exchanges. The conversion of securities prior to filing of the DRHP exposes the selling shareholders to greater risks owing to lack of visibility on the pricing and the timing of the IPO for a long period of four to six months. The ICDR Regulations now allow selling shareholders to convert fully paid-up compulsorily convertible securities prior to filing of the RHP (in the case of a book-built issue), provided that the selling shareholder complies with the holding period of one year prior to the DRHP with respect to the securities and provides full disclosures of the terms of conversion or exchange in the draft offer document. This change was incorporated to provide the selling shareholders more flexibility and visibility on the pricing and timelines for the completion of the IPO.
iii Considerations for foreign issuers
A foreign issuer cannot list its equity shares on the stock exchanges in India. A foreign entity can access the Indian capital markets through issuance of Indian depository receipts (IDRs). IDRs are denominated in Indian rupees and issued by a depository. A foreign issuer proposing to issue IDRs should also be listed in its home country; not be prohibited from issuing securities by any regulatory body; and have a track record of compliance with securities market regulations in its home country. There has only been one issuance of IDRs in India to date, namely by Standard Chartered PLC.
If an Indian subsidiary of a foreign entity proposes to list its equity shares, the foreign entity will be named as a promoter. If the immediate holding company is a shell company and does not undertake any substantial business, the entity who has ultimate control over the Indian subsidiary will be required to be named as the promoter as well.
The overall ceiling limit for foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) is 24 per cent of the paid-up capital of the issuer, and for non-resident Indians (NRIs) and overseas citizens of India (OCIs) on a repatriation basis, 10 per cent of the paid-up capital of the issuer. The ceiling limit for FPIs can be raised to the statutory ceiling limits, and the ceiling limit for NRIs and OCIs can be raised to 24 per cent, subject to the approval of the board of directors and the shareholders of the issuer. RBI monitors the ceiling limits on a daily basis and has an effective monitoring mechanism in place to ensure that FPIs, NRIs and OCIs do not exceed the aggregate ceiling limit.
IV POST-IPO REQUIREMENTS
Once an entity is listed on the stock exchanges, it must comply with all the requirements of the Listing Regulations, as applicable. The Listing Regulations require the listed entity to make disclosures of any events and information to the stock exchange that is 'material' in the opinion of the board of directors of the entity; shareholding pattern of the entity; and quarterly and annual stand-alone financial results within 45 days of the end of each quarter other than the last quarter, to the stock exchanges on which the securities of the entity are listed.
All listed companies are also required to comply with other SEBI regulations, including the Insider Trading Regulations in relation to treatment of unpublished price-sensitive information. According to these regulations, the board of directors of every entity whose securities are listed on a stock exchange is required to formulate and publish on its official website a code of practices and procedures for fair disclosure of unpublished price-sensitive information, which it would follow in order to adhere to each of the principles set out in these regulations; and a code of conduct to regulate, monitor and report trading by employees and other connected persons towards achieving compliance with these regulations, adopting the minimum standards set out in these regulations. The listed entity is also required to comply with the public offer requirements under the Takeover Regulations when there is a direct or indirect acquisition of control above the minimum thresholds as prescribed under the regulations.
V OUTLOOK AND CONCLUSION
The year 2019 is the year for general elections in India; it is expected to be dependent on the results of these elections. Markets will hope for a stable government; an unclear verdict will probably be the most disruptive.
Mutual funds and systematic investment plans (SIPs) witnessed significant growth in 2017 to 2018. The mutual funds industry saw investments of 5.1 trillion rupees in the equity market and a gross resources mobilisation of 209.99 trillion rupees during 2017 to 2018 compared with 176.16 trillion rupees during 2016 to 2017 and 137.65 trillion rupees during 2015 to 2016.10 In 2017 to 2018, the net resources mobilised by all mutual funds in India were 2.72 trillion rupees, out of which 63 per cent was raised through equity-oriented schemes.11 SIPs have become increasingly popular among Indian investors. The total SIP contribution in 2016 to 2017 amounted to 439.21 billion rupees. In 2017 to 2018, it rose to 671.90 billion rupees and is estimated to reach around 684.79 billion rupees in 2018 to 2019.12 We believe that both demand and supply of funds is available, and political stability may create a new wave of transactions for the next few years.
On the regulatory side, there could be a significant change to allow equity shares (and not just depository receipts) of Indian companies to list outside India without having to simultaneously list in India, and for equity shares (and not just depository receipts) of foreign companies to list in India. This would create opportunity for both Indian companies and investors.
1 Bhakta Batsal Patnaik is a partner and Rachana Talati is a senior associate at Trilegal.
2 International Monetary Fund – IMF Country Report No. 18/254, available at https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/CR/Issues/2018/08/06/India-2018-Article-IV-Consultation-Press-Release-Staff-Report-and-Statement-by-the-Executive-46155, last accessed on 14 January 2019.
4 Securities and exchange Board of India Annual Report 2017-18, available at www.sebi.gov.in/reports/annual-reports/aug-2018/annual-report-2017-18_39868.html, last accessed on 14 January 2019.
6 BSE – Introduction, available at www.bseindia.com/static/about/company_overview.html, last accessed on 31 January 2019.
7 Asia Index Pvt Ltd, S&P BSE SENSEX, available at www.asiaindex.co.in/indices/equity/sp-bse-sensex, last accessed on 14 January 2019.
8 National Stock Exchange – About NSE, available at www.nseindia.com/global/content/about_us/about_us.htm, last accessed on 14 January 2019.
9 National Stock Exchange – Indices, available at www.nseindia.com/products/content/equities/indices/nifty_50.htm, last accessed on 14 January 2019.
10 Securities and exchange Board of India Annual Report 2017-18, available at www.sebi.gov.in/reports/annual-reports/aug-2018/annual-report-2017-18_39868.html, last accessed on 14 January 2019.
12 Association of Mutual Funds in India- Mutual Funds, available at https://www.amfiindia.com/mutual-fund, last accessed on 14 January 2019.