Banks play a fundamental role as intermediaries in the financial market by taking deposits and providing lending to utilise the funds from the general public to finance valuable production and other investment activities. According to the statistics of the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC), the banking industry regulator in Taiwan, as of February 2018, the total amount of loans provided by financial institutions was approximately NT$27.88 trillion (approximately US$938 billion), an increase of 4.22 per cent from 2016. As to the Taiwan syndicated loan market, the total amount of Taiwan syndicated loans in 2017 was around US$36.98 billion, consisting of 173 syndicated loans, an increase of 9.2 per cent from 2016. In 2017, government-owned or managed local banks still dominated the local syndicated loan market. The Bank of Taiwan, Taiwan Cooperative Bank, MEGA International Commercial Bank, Land Bank of Taiwan and Fubon Financial Holding Co, Ltd are the top five banks providing syndicated loans in Taiwan. Except for Fubon Financial Holding Co, Ltd, the other four are government-owned or managed local banks.
II LEGAL AND REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS
Although banks still have a dominant role in the loan market, developments in technology have seen the peer-to-peer (P2P) lending platform – which provides an online platform for bridging direct lending from non-professional lenders to borrowers of individuals or small businesses – develop as an innovative financial broker. P2P lending, also known as marketplace lending, has become a well-developed or known lending practice in other jurisdictions but is still new to the Taiwan market.
In the face of this new development, the FSC still has concerns. In April 2016, the FSC issued a press release pointing out that the P2P lending platform may (1) become involved in the deposit-taking business, which is regulated by the Banking Act; (2) engage in usury, which would violate the Criminal Law; (3) violate the Fair Trade Act if the platform makes false or misleading statements to potential lenders and borrowers, such as ‘high profit, low cost and low risk’, which may be deemed as misleading advertising; and (4) breach the Multi-Level Marketing Supervision Act if the P2P lending platform establishes a multilevel mechanism to offer borrowers rewards for recruiting new participants. In addition, personal information leakage may be another key issue in P2P lending. At that time, the FSC was contemplating enacting a law to govern P2P lending in the near future.
Nonetheless, the FSC subsequently issued another press release in September 2016, showing its positive attitude toward fintech including P2P lending. The FSC encouraged banks to take advantage of the power of fintech, including P2P lending, and concurrently enhance internal control mechanisms and reduce risks in P2P lending. Pursuant to a ruling issued by the FSC on 13 December 2016, a bank or a financial holding company may invest in P2P lending platforms as part of its operations.
Instead of enacting a law to govern P2P lending, the FSC issued a letter on 7 December 2017 encouraging the banks to cooperate with and assist in P2P lending platforms, including custody of the lending proceeds and check of the borrower’s credit. As the banks have stronger internal control mechanisms, from a policy perspective, the banks are encouraged to play an important role in the development of the P2P lending businesses.
III TAX CONSIDERATIONS
i Gross business receipt tax
Gross business receipts tax rates for entities in the financial industry (banks, insurance companies, investment trusts, securities firms, futures and commercial paper enterprises, etc.) are as follows:
- 2 per cent on the revenues generated from the regulated businesses (such as a bank’s deposit-taking business and a securities firm’s underwriting income), except for banks and insurance companies, whose revenues generated from their core businesses from 1 July 2014 onward will apply the rate of 5 per cent;
- 5 per cent on the revenues generated from non-regulated businesses (such as a bank’s rental income from office leases); and
- 1 per cent on an insurance company’s reinsurance premium income.
ii Withholding tax
For a foreign lender that is a non-Taiwan resident or a profit-seeking enterprise without a fixed place of business in Taiwan, the withholding tax rate for interest applicable to a corporate borrower is 20 per cent, but for interest earned on short-term commercial papers, securitised instruments, government, corporate or financial institution bonds, or conditional transactions, the withholding tax rate is 15 per cent. Moreover, most tax treaties provide a reduced income tax withholding rate of 10 per cent. Taiwan has signed tax treaties with 32 jurisdictions, namely, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Gambia, Germany, Hungary, Indonesia, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Kiribati, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Malaysia, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Paraguay, Poland, Senegal, Singapore, Slovakia, South Africa, Swaziland, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, the United Kingdom and Vietnam.
iii Income tax
Under the Income Tax Act, any interest income that is deemed Taiwan-sourced income is subject to Taiwan income tax in general. In general, the interest paid by a local borrower to a foreign lender will be deemed Taiwan-sourced income. The following types of income are exempted from income tax:
- interest on loans offered to Taiwanese government or legal entities within the territory of Taiwan by foreign governments or international financial institutions for economic development, and interest on the financing facilities offered to their branch offices and domestic financial institutions within the territory of Taiwan by foreign financial institutions;
- interest on loans extended to legal entities within the territory of Taiwan by foreign financial institutions for financing fundamental infrastructure projects under the approval of the Ministry of Finance; and
- interest on export loans at favourable interest rates offered to or guaranteed for legal entities within the territory of Taiwan by foreign governmental institutions or foreign financial institutions that specialise in offering export loans or guarantees.
Moreover, some of the tax treaties provide an exemption from income tax withholding for interest payments. For example, the Netherlands–Taiwan Tax Treaty provides that the interest paid in respect of a bond, debenture or other similar obligation of a Taiwanese public entity, or of a subdivision or local authority of Taiwan, should be taxed only in the Netherlands.
iv Documentary tax
No notarisation or stamp duty is required for the creation of a security interest over different types of assets such as (1) a mortgage over real properties; (2) a chattel mortgage over a movable asset, such as machinery and equipment; (3) a pledge over movable assets or securities, or a pledge over the pledgor’s rights that are transferable, such as the pledgor’s rights to bank accounts, accounts receivable or patents; and (4) a secured assignment of property rights.
v Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act
To prevent US taxpayers who hold financial assets in non-US financial institutions and other offshore accounts from avoiding their tax payment obligations, Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) generally requires foreign financial institutions to enter into agreements with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to identify US accounts and report certain information about those accounts and investments held by US taxpayers to the IRS on an annual basis. If they fail to enter into such agreements to report US accounts, they will face a 30 per cent withholding charge. In 2014, the FSC announced that Taiwan is recognised by the United States as a jurisdiction having Agreement in Substance status in respect of FATCA. This status allows Taiwanese financial institutions to be exempted from the 30 per cent withholding tax on incomes from the United States.
Taiwan and the US signed the Intergovernmental Agreement of FATCA (IGA) on 22 December 2016, and the IGA is pending the review and approval of Taiwan Legislative Yuan. After the IGA takes effect, the IRS may request the Taiwan competent authority to provide detailed information of the recalcitrant accounts.
As to the lending market in Taiwan, lenders recognise that in practice they need to be FATCA-compliant to participate in the lending market. To prevent the residual risk of FATCA withholding being imposed on lenders, the standard FATCA provisions, such as excluding FATCA from the tax gross-up and tax indemnity provisions, are normally provided in the loan agreement. The lending market has typically accepted such provisions, which have become a standard part of the loan agreement.
IV CREDIT SUPPORT AND SUBORDINATION
Under Taiwan law, different types of assets are subject to different formal requirements for perfection of a security interest created over them. Below is a brief introduction to the formal requirements on the most commonly seen security interests. Taiwan law does not permit the taking of security over ‘all assets’ of an entity by way of floating charge. As a general rule, the security provider and the security interest holder should enter into an agreement to identify the specific asset subject to the security interest. A general security agreement that does not identify the specific asset, such as a floating charge, is not enforceable under Taiwan law.
The security to be created over machinery and equipment may be a pledge or a chattel mortgage. Both security interests give the security interest holder first priority over the machinery and equipment. To create a pledge, the pledgor and the pledgee have to enter into a written agreement and the pledgor should deliver the possession of the machinery and equipment to the pledgee, but a registration with the competent authority is not required. To create a chattel mortgage, the mortgagor need not deliver the possession thereof to the mortgagee; however, a registration with the competent authority will be necessary for the mortgagee to claim the chattel mortgage against a bona fide third party.
A security interest over real properties is taken by way of a mortgage registered with the relevant land registration offices. A security interest over real properties will not be validly created if registration is not duly completed. To create a valid mortgage over land, a building or a plant, the mortgagor and the mortgagee should enter into a written agreement and complete the registration.
The deposit in a bank account can be pledged by way of a written agreement executed by the depositor and the lender and a notice of the creation of the pledge served on the account bank. The pledge will only be perfected when a notice has been served on the account bank. Nevertheless, as described above, the concept of a floating charge is not recognised under Taiwan law. In other words, the pledge covers only the cash in the bank account when the pledge is created and notified to the account bank. The pledge will not cover the cash deposited in the bank account after the account bank is notified of the creation of the pledge. To deal with this issue, the pledgor in practice will be required to periodically confirm with the account bank and agree on the creation of a pledge over the most current balance in the bank account to ensure that the pledge also covers the cash deposited after the creation of the pledge.
When a receivable or a contractual right is transferable, security over the receivables or contractual rights is taken normally by way of secured assignment in favour of the lender. A service of notice of the assignment to the obligor of the receivable or the contractual right is required for perfection. To create a pledge over receivables, the pledgee and the pledgor must enter into a written agreement. In addition, the receivables must be identifiable according to the content of the pledge agreement. Further, the obligor should be notified of the creation of the pledge for the pledgee to be able to claim the pledge against the obligor.
According to the Company Act, a company limited by shares should issue shares in certificated form if its issued capital reaches the threshold amount specified by the competent authority (currently, NT$500 million or approximately US$15,625,000). In addition, a public company may issue shares in scripless form. To create a pledge over shares in certificated forms, a written agreement is required. The certificates of the pledged shares shall be duly endorsed and delivered by the pledgor to the pledgee. Furthermore, the company issuing the shares shall be notified of the creation of a pledge to register the pledge on the shareholders’ roster. The creation of a pledge is valid between the pledgee and the pledgor when the certificates of the shares have been endorsed and delivered to the pledgee. Without a notice to the issuing company, the creation of the pledge cannot be claimed against the company.
To create a pledge over listed shares in scripless form that are traded and transferred through the book-entry system of the Taiwan Depository and Clearing Corporation, the pledgor and the pledgee have to sign a form prescribed by the Taiwan Depository and Clearing Corporation and have the pledge registered with it.
ii Guarantees and other forms of credit support
Under Taiwan law, a guarantor may refuse to perform the guaranteed obligations until the compulsory execution against the property of the borrower proves to be futile (i.e., the lender must seek payment from the principal debtor first); provided, however, that the guarantor may waive (and in practice must waive as required by a lender) this defence (i.e., beneficium ordinis) in advance. In practice, a guarantor is normally required to act as a joint guarantor (i.e., jointly and severally liable with the borrower for the loan), so the lender may commence concurrent legal action against both the borrower and the guarantor.
In the circumstance under which the guarantor is not a joint guarantor nor waives the defence of beneficium ordinis, the lender must seek payment from the borrower first and the guarantor later. The legal proceeding for the lender to seek payment from the borrower may take months or years. Therefore, there is a risk that before the lender seeks payment from the guarantor, the guarantor may attempt to transfer its assets to others to avoid enforcement by the lender.
In addition to general negative pledge in the loan agreement, the lender may seek a specific negative pledge from the borrower as provided under the Banking Act. When no collateral is provided to a lender under a financing transaction, the lender may require the board of directors of the borrower to pass a resolution providing a negative pledge undertaking that the borrower will pledge or mortgage its assets in favour of the lender and, before that is done, the borrower shall not pledge or mortgage the same to any third party. If the borrower breaches the undertaking, the borrower’s directors or officers who make the decision to breach the negative pledge shall be jointly and severally liable for compensating the lender, and shall be subject to imprisonment for not more than three years, detention or a criminal fine of not more than NT$1.8 million (or both).
iii Priorities and subordination
Security interests, such as a pledge and a mortgage, will have priority over other claims or rights of the borrower’s creditor unless otherwise provided by mandatory provisions of laws. The sale proceeds of the mortgaged or pledged property in a court compulsory execution proceeding will be allocated and distributed in accordance with the following order: (1) expenses paid by the pledgee or the mortgagee for the compulsory execution proceedings; (2) applicable taxes having priority over the security interest under mandatory provisions of laws; (3) statutory security interest; (4) the mortgagee or pledgee of the property; (5) certain labour claims in the event that the employer winds up or liquidates its business or has been adjudicated bankrupt; (6) applicable taxes, if any, having no priority over the security interest; and (7) unsecured creditors.
In the case of unsecured financing, the lender in practice would require that the borrower enter into a subordination agreement with the borrower’s shareholders or affiliates so that the unsecured loans provided by these persons to the borrower will be subordinate to the loan provided by the lender. Unlike a security interest having priority over unsecured debts of the borrower, the subordination agreement is merely a contractual undertaking from the borrower and its shareholder or affiliate and does not have the effect of priority preferred by law.
V LEGAL RESERVATIONS AND OPINIONS PRACTICE
i Limitations for foreign companies on taking security
Article 12 of the Law Governing the Application of the General Principles of the Civil Code provides that a foreign legal person, upon being recognised, will have, to the extent as provided by laws and regulations, the same capacity to enjoy rights as a legal person in Taiwan of the same type. To the extent that it is not recognised in Taiwan, the foreign legal person might not enjoy the same rights as a legal person in Taiwan of the same type. In addition, according to a letter issued by the Ministry of Economic Affairs dated 1 September 1997, a foreign company that does not have a branch in Taiwan is not entitled to the rights of a pledge or mortgage.
Notwithstanding the above, in connection with aircraft financing, the Civil Aeronautics Administration (CAA) has been of the opinion for decades that aircraft can be validly mortgaged to a foreign legal entity without having a branch office in Taiwan. Moreover, the Harbour Bureau customarily will permit a foreign lender without a branch in Taiwan to be registered as a mortgagee in connection with ship financing. The opinions of the CAA and Harbour Bureau are, however, subject to test in court because of lack of precedents.
ii Limitations on lending and making of guarantees
According to the Company Act, a company shall not lend to any shareholder of the company or any other person except: (1) where an inter-company or inter-firm business transaction calls for such a lending arrangement; or (2) where an inter-company or inter-firm short-term financing facility is necessary, provided that the amount of the financing facility shall not exceed 40 per cent of the amount of the net value of the lending company. In addition, a company shall not act as a guarantor of any nature, unless otherwise permitted by any law or by the articles of incorporation of the company.
In addition to the restriction provided in the Company Act, a public company should adopt internal rules in accordance with the Regulations Governing Loaning of Funds and Making of Endorsements or Guarantees by Public Companies. The internal rules must set forth the rules and guidelines a company should follow in making loans or providing guarantees. For example, a public company may not make endorsements or guarantees for other companies except for (1) a company with which it does business; (2) a company in which the public company directly and indirectly holds more than 50 per cent of the voting shares; or (3) a company that directly and indirectly holds more than 50 per cent of the voting shares in the public company. Moreover, companies in which the public company holds, directly or indirectly, 90 per cent or more of the voting shares may make endorsements or guarantees for each other, and the amount of endorsements or guarantees may not exceed 10 per cent of the net worth of the public company, provided that this restriction shall not apply to endorsements or guarantees made between companies in which the public company holds, directly or indirectly, 100 per cent of the voting shares.
iii Financial assistance
Financial assistance generally refers to assistance provided by a target for the acquisition by a third party of shares in the target, by advancing funds, making loans or providing security. Generally speaking, the provision by the company of financial assistance in this context is subject to restrictions under Taiwan law. As mentioned above, there are prohibitions and restrictions regarding the loans or guarantees provided by a company. The provision of security other than a guarantee generally will be deemed as providing a guarantee as well and is subject to the same restrictions.
iv Choice of a foreign governing law
Generally, the choice of a foreign governing law to govern a contract (e.g., the loan agreement) would be recognised as a valid choice of law and given effect by the courts of Taiwan, provided that the relevant provisions of the foreign governing law would not be applied to the extent the courts hold that: (1) the application of the provisions would be contrary to the public order or good morals of Taiwan; or (2) the provisions would have the effect of circumventing mandatory or prohibitive provisions of Taiwan law. However, where the contract is about the creation or perfection of a security interest, such as a pledge and mortgage, the choice of law will be subject to the law of Taiwan regarding conflicts of law. As a general rule, if the property is located in Taiwan or if the rights subject to the security interest arise from Taiwan law, such as the shares in a Taiwan company, the law of Taiwan on conflicts of law will refer to Taiwan law as the governing law.
VI LOAN TRADING
i Performing loans
According to a ruling issued by the FSC, a bank generally shall not transfer its performing loans to others unless meeting any of the following exceptions: (1) the bank obtains consent from the borrower; (2) the bank transfers its loan to other financial institutions pursuant to the Financial Institutions Merger Act or the Financial Asset Securitisation Act; or (3) the bank has a special need to do so, such as for refinancing purposes. If the bank violates the above restrictions, it may be deemed as violating the principle of good faith and according to Article 294, Paragraph 1, Subparagraph 2 of the Civil Code, the transfer may be invalid. Furthermore, the bank may be deemed as violating its confidentiality obligations under the Banking Act.
ii Non-performing loans
According to the Directions Governing the Sale of Non-Performing Loans by the Financial Institutions, in general the financial institutions shall collect the debts themselves; provided however, that a financial institution may sell its non-performing loans when the ratio of the non-performing loans of the financial institution exceeds a certain percentage (currently 3 per cent); or, if less than 3 per cent, the non-performing loans are syndicated loans; loans extended by offshore branches or offshore banking units of the financial institution; or loans extended to construction companies.
VII OUTLOOK AND CONCLUSIONS
Compared with 2016, the syndicated loan market for 2017 is stable with a small increase in the loan proceeds raised. Nevertheless, with the Taiwanese government in full support of developing the offshore wind power in Taiwan, it is foreseeable that the need for syndicated loans to finance the offshore wind power projects, either ongoing or under planning, would be much stronger in the coming years.
Against the above background, because the P2P lending platform provides a more convenient and efficient channel for lending money and investing, and allows different kinds of borrowers to utilise more flexible lending amounts, it has been strong recently. Furthermore, as the regulator remains open-minded about this emerging channel, it may have an impact on the traditional financial industry, especially the banks.
1 Abe Sung is a partner and Mark Yu is an associate partner at Lee and Li, Attorneys-at-Law.