i GENERAL OVERVIEW
Poland is consistently one of the most desirable destinations for private equity funds investing in central and eastern Europe (CEE). The country has experienced sustained and rapid growth since the 1990s when the market economy was reinstated. As the largest and most populous country in the region, Poland is a regional leader in economic terms with robust GDP growth. In the first half of 2018, GDP growth in CEE amounted to 4.2 per cent, while in Poland at the same time it reached a level of 5.2 per cent.2 CEE countries continue to be Europe's strongest region for GDP growth, with an estimated growth of 4.5 per cent for 2017.3 The World Bank projects Poland's 2018 economic growth at 4.2 per cent on the back of investments, and private consumption.4 Furthermore, the World Bank's forecast for central Europe for 2018 and 2019 is 4.5 per cent and 3.6 per cent, respectively.5
In 2017, total private equity fundraising in CEE reached €1.26 billion (a 46 per cent year-on-year increase) and private equity investment reached €3.5 billion – a new record for the region. As home to almost a quarter of the companies receiving funding, Poland remained the regional leader with 71 per cent of the CEE's total investment value, followed by Romania, Hungary and Latvia. Investment in these four countries comprised an aggregate 96 per cent of total CEE investment value. Poland also remained the largest CEE market for exits in 2017, with 47 per cent of regional divestments by value at cost.6
In 2017, CEE private equity investment measured as a percentage of the region's GDP increased significantly, from 0.122 per cent in 2016 to 0.239 per cent in 2017, and although it remained below the European average of 0.436 per cent, Poland showed results above the CEE regional average.7
CEE buyout investments rose year on year by 135 per cent to a record level of €2.8 billion in 2017. Buyout investments all across Europe increased 37 per cent year on year to €51.2 billion – the highest level since 2007. Comprising 80 per cent of the total regional private equity investment by value, CEE buyouts were proportionally above the wider European level of 71 per cent. The number of CEE companies receiving buyout financing decreased from 42 in 2016 to 35 in 2017.8
Importantly, despite its sustained growth, the Polish private equity market still remains underdeveloped in comparison with Scandinavian or western European countries, which means that Poland still has high growth potential.
ii LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR FUNDRAISING
Poland has an established and original legal framework permitting the operation of regulated private equity investment vehicles, in particular those in the form of 'undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities' (UCITS)9 investment funds and non-UCITS investment funds. The establishment and operation of such funds and of their managers are regulated under the 2004 Act on Investment Funds and on Management of Alternative Investment Funds (IFA).
Moreover, following the entry into force on 4 June 2016 of the 2016 Act Amending the Act on Investment Funds and Certain Other Acts, there is an established legal framework for the new category of investment vehicles – namely alternative investment companies (ASIs) – deemed alternative investment funds (AIF) under the EU Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD).10 ASIs are generally non-regulated investment vehicles, in the form of 'ordinary' commercial companies, governed by the applicable rules of the Commercial Companies Code.
In 2017, a number of secondary legal acts regulating terms of conduct were issued, dealing with, inter alia, investment funds investing in derivative instruments, setting AIF maximum exposure limits, and alternative investment company managers' reporting obligations.
i Non-UCITS investment funds (closed-end investment funds and specialised open-end investment funds)
Polish law provides for two types of non-UCITS investment funds: closed-end investment funds (FIZs) and specialised open-end investment funds (SFIOs), both managed by an external and regulated investment fund management company (TFI). These funds are of a specific legal nature that cannot be unambiguously qualified from the perspective of usual EU investment fund classifications (corporate, contractual or trust types of funds). Like corporate entities, Polish investment funds have a separate legal personality and governing bodies. On the other hand, they are strictly distinguished from typical commercial companies.
The IFA allows both an FIZ and an SFIO (provided it applies the principles and investment limits of an FIZ) to be established specifically as a 'non-public assets fund' (NPA fund) investing at least 80 per cent of its assets in assets other than (1) securities offered in a public offering or admitted to trading on a regulated market, or both, unless the offering or admission takes place after the purchase of the securities by the fund; and (2) money market instruments, unless they have been issued by private companies whose shares are held in the fund's investment portfolio. Such NPA funds also benefit from a slightly lighter regulatory regime than other types of funds.
FIZs are often used as 'private' investment vehicles designed to enjoy various legal benefits (inter alia, tax benefits) by one or more investors ('dedicated' funds). To date, this practice appears to be accepted by the Polish financial services regulator – the Financial Supervision Authority (KNF) – which has publicly acknowledged that strict supervision of FIZs is unnecessary because FIZs are usually used by qualified investors.
An FIZ structure provides investors and TFIs with relatively broad flexibility in structuring the terms of their cooperation. At the same time, investing through an FIZ is subject to a number of statutory limitations or obligations. It is advisable to pre-agree, in particular, the following issues with the managing TFI before or during establishment of the FIZ.
Payment for certificates
As a rule, investment certificates issued to the investor should be paid for in cash. However, the IFA provides for certain limited possibilities for in-kind contributions (e.g., with transferable securities).
Limited scope of the FIZ's permitted investments
The IFA sets out a closed list of investments that could be made by an FIZ (inter alia, securities, shares in limited liability companies (which, under Polish law, are not securities) and non-standardised derivatives. Under certain conditions, an FIZ may also invest in real estate.
The IFA expressly states that in respect of foreign instruments, their qualification as securities should be based on the legislation applicable to the company issuing the securities. Furthermore, the instruments acquired by or contributed to the FIZ have to meet the criteria of transferability. Consequently, an FIZ may not become a partner in most Polish or foreign law partnerships (unless they issue transferable securities, such as the Luxembourg SCSp).
Type of investment certificates
FIZs may issue publicly and non-publicly traded investment certificates qualified as transferable securities under Directive 2014/65/EU on markets in financial instruments (MiFID II). The distinction between publicly and non-publicly traded investment certificates is based on the number of investors to whom certificates would be offered. In principle, should there be fewer than 150 investors, non-public certificates may be issued. The certificates can be either dematerialised or issued in tangible form (subject to obligatory dematerialisation starting from 1 July 2019 – see below), as well as in registered or bearer form. In most cases, private equity investors choose non-publicly traded, dematerialised and registered investment certificates, which affords them flexibility and eliminates additional regulatory duties.
Diversification of investments
To reduce the investment risk, the IFA requires, inter alia, that the aggregate of shares in one entity cannot represent more than 20 per cent of the value of an FIZ's assets. An FIZ is legally obliged to adjust its portfolio to the statutory limits within one year of its registration, subject to the possible imposition of sanctions on the TFI by the KNF.
In the case of an FIZ operating as a private equity fund, this adjustment period is extended to three years. On the basis of certain further exceptions related to FIZs that have been established for a specified time, Polish TFIs are in a position to prolong the transition period for up to six years (or even to roll it over continually).
Investors' influence on the management of the FIZ (including the exercise of rights over the assets held by the FIZ) is limited. This is because the TFI, as a third-party entity, manages the FIZ and represents it in relation to third parties because the FIZ does not have its own management board (as in the case of 'regular' companies). The management of an FIZ may be assigned by the TFI only to a third party being a qualified investment entity, bank or other entity specified by the IFA and authorised by the KNF (or a similar authority within the EU) to manage investment funds.
Investors' rights are exercised through participation in FIZ's investors' meetings, adopting resolutions in respect of the most crucial issues related to the operation of the FIZ (its liquidation, change of certificates from non-publicly into publicly traded certificates, etc.). The statutes of the FIZ may broaden the investors' meeting authority to granting consent in respect of particular actions; however, actions taken in breach of those consent requirements are legally valid.
If there are at least three investors in an FIZ, its statutes may provide for a board of investors. The board of investors acts as a supervisory body and monitors the implementation of the fund's investment goal and its investment policy, as well as the application of investment limits. Within the scope of the board's responsibilities, the members of the board have access to the fund's books and documents, and the right to demand explanations from the management company. The statutes of an FIZ may broaden the powers of the board of investors.
Generally, all distributions to investors from an FIZ's assets result from redemption of their investment certificates. Distribution of profit is an extraordinary case, mainly reserved for FIZs operating as NPA funds and resulting from the direct sale of an FIZ's assets. Rules of redemption of certificates and distribution of profit should be specified in the FIZ's statutes.
SFIOs are not as popular a form of private equity fund as FIZs. The SFIO is a type of open-end investment fund issuing participation units (financial instruments not qualified as securities), and its statutes may restrict participation in the fund only to certain categories of entities (i.e., legal persons, organisational units without legal personality or natural persons). Moreover, natural persons must make a one-off payment to the fund of an amount not lower than the zloty equivalent of €40,000. The statutes of an SFIO may also specify further conditions of eligibility.
As previously mentioned, SFIOs applying the investment principles and investment limits of an FIZ may benefit from the special rules applicable to NPA funds (in particular, a longer deadline for diversification of assets and limited possibilities for profit distribution). At the same time, the NPA fund would still be subject to the less flexible principles of operation and regulatory regime of an open-end investment fund, making this form less attractive to private equity investors.
ii Commercial companies
Polish fundraising legal framework after 2016 amendments
Recent implementation of AIFMD into the Polish law – which took place in 2016, with a transitional period that ended only in mid 2017 – significantly affected the use of commercial companies as investment vehicles. As from that time, such companies are classified as alternative investment companies (ASIs) and subject to a regulatory regime not unlike that applicable to other AIFs (i.e., investment funds), including an obligation imposed on the alternative investment company manager (ZASI) to enter into an agreement for the performance of depositary functions with a depositary.
A ZASI cannot engage in any business activity other than ASI or AIF management. A ZASI is quite strictly regulated as to its corporate structure, the qualifications of its directors and its applied remuneration policy. Certain capital requirements are applicable to a ZASI, particularly in respect of its own capital. Transfers of significant batches of shares in a ZASI are also subject to certain restrictions and notification obligations. Outsourcing of ZASI activities is permitted, albeit subject to notification obligation or authorisation by the KNF (depending on the scope of the outsourcing). Regulations pertaining to a ZASI are not applicable to a company managing an ASI whose investors (i.e., its limited partners) are members of the same capital group as the managing company, provided that none of those investors is itself an ASI or EU-AIF.
Consequently, the list of non-UCITS-regulated investment vehicles currently includes the following legal forms:
|Externally managed||FIZs SFIOs||SKA Limited partnerships (spk)|
|Internally managed||–||Joint-stock companies (SA) Limited liability companies (Sp. z o.o.)|
Importantly, as confirmed in the KNF's position dated 26 April 2017, entities (companies or partnerships) established after 4 June 2016 (the date of the entry into force of the Polish AIFMD implementation), or that at that time did not conduct a business activity consisting in the collection of assets from many investors to invest them in the interest of those investors in accordance with a specific investment policy, simply cannot 'become' an ASI. Instead, an ASI should be incorporated (organised) and registered from scratch with the intention of becoming an ASI. Entities that existed (and conducted such a business activity) prior to 4 June 2016 could benefit from undertaking a transitional period that permitted them to obtain ASI status.
A limited partnership combines the features of a typical partnership and a commercial company. It must be established and conducted by at least two entities (natural persons, legal persons or organisational units without legal personality), with at least one partner – the general partner – bearing unlimited liability towards creditors for obligations of the partnership and at least one partner – the limited partner – having only limited liability and acting as an investor.
A limited partnership that is an ASI has only one general partner, namely a capital company or an European company, with its registered office in Poland or – in some cases – a non-EU Member State. This general partner is the relevant ZASI and must either be authorised by the KNF or – in the case of relatively small-scale operations – entered into the relevant ZASI register. The relevant ZASI is obliged to manage the affairs of the ASI, including at least the management of its portfolio and risk. A single ZASI acting as a general partner may manage more than one ASI in the form of a limited partnership (or a SKA – see below).
Importantly, limited partnerships are tax transparent. Although they are not, technically, legal persons, they possess a legal, judicial and procedural capacity and may in their own name acquire rights, including ownership of immovable property and other rights in rem, incur obligations, sue and be sued.
The limited partner is only liable up to the value of its contribution to the limited partnership. On the contrary, the liability of the general partner is unlimited. The general partner holds the liability of all assets severally with the other general partners, and with the limited partnership itself.
A limited partnership is established by way of a partnership deed in the form of a notarial deed, signed by all general partners and registration in the National Court Register. No minimum capital is required.
As a rule, all matters that exceed the ordinary scope of a limited partnership's business require the consent of the limited partner, unless the partnership deed provides otherwise. Consequently, investors should make sure that their rights under the deed have been stipulated in a satisfactory way. Furthermore, in accordance with the general rules governing limited partnerships, a limited partner has a right to participate in the partnership's profit in relevant proportion to its actual contribution to the partnership. However, the deed may stipulate otherwise, and investors should certainly consider the scope of the partnership deed in that respect.
Partnership limited by shares
A partnership limited by shares (SKA) structure combines the elements of a limited partnership and a joint-stock company, making it the most composite type of partnership in Poland. Like the limited partnership, the SKA has no legal personality, but it has legal, judicial and procedural capacity, which means that it may acquire rights and incur obligations on its own behalf (e.g., under agreements), as well as have legal standing in court.
An SKA is established by at least one general partner and one shareholder (the general partner and the shareholder may be either natural persons, legal persons or organisational units without legal personality). Asa an SKA is an ASI, it is no different from a legal partnership as regards its sole general partner, which must be a ZASI.
As in the case of a limited partnership, the general partner's liability for the SKA's obligations is unlimited. The liability is joint and several among the general partners and subsidiaries with regard to the SKA. The shareholders do not bear any liability for the SKA's obligations.
As is the case with a limited partnership, an SKA is required to be entered into the National Court Register. The statutes should specify the value of share capital in an amount of at least 50,000 zlotys. The share capital consists only of the contributions made by the shareholders (or general partners in cases where the general partner is simultaneously a shareholder).
In respect of the shareholder's economic rights, the shareholder should ensure its right to participate in the profit of the SKA in proportion to the contributions they have made (i.e., at least proportionally to the value of their contributions). It is possible to establish preference shares with regard to the right to dividend of up to 150 per cent of the dividend designated to non-preference shares. To increase the attractiveness and legal certainty of the SKA, the SKA's statute may provide that each share taken up or acquired by a shareholder (investor) will give the right to more than one vote (with a maximum of two votes per share). Finally, it is possible to establish preference shares with regard to the distribution of the SKA's assets in the event of its liquidation.
The SKA's statutes may also provide for a supervisory board appointed by the shareholders.
Limited liability company
A limited liability company (Sp. z o.o.) is a simplified form of a capital company. It has legal personality and may be established by any number of shareholders, even by an individual shareholder (except a single limited liability company with only one shareholder). Shareholders are not liable for the company's obligations. The minimum share capital is 5,000 zlotys.
The articles of association must be executed in the form of a deed. After all contributions indicated in the articles of association are made, the management board (and in some cases also the supervisory board or the audit committee) is appointed, and the company is entered into the National Court Register.
Rights and obligations of the shareholders are, as a rule, determined in the articles of association. Polish law allows a wide array of individual rights and obligations that can be granted to or imposed on the shareholders of an Sp. z o.o. Basic shareholders' rights include voting rights and participation in the company's profits.
If the Sp. z o.o. is used as an investment vehicle, it constitutes an ASI, and as such is subject to the regulatory framework applicable to limited partnerships and SKAs described earlier. However, unlike the latter two structures, an ASI that is a limited liability company is its own ZASI and cannot engage in any business activity other than management of its own investment activity. In particular, it cannot act as a ZASI for other ASIs (in the form of a limited partnership or an SKA).
A joint-stock company (SA) is the model capital company in the Polish legal system. The company is a legal person and may be established by any number of shareholders, even an individual shareholder (except a single limited liability company with only one shareholder). Shareholders are not liable for the company's obligations. Minimum share capital is 100,000 zlotys and the value of share capital must be expressly specified in the statutes.
For an SA to be established, the statutes (in the form of a deed) must be signed by all original shareholders, who in turn must take up all shares in the company. Additionally, two obligatory corporate bodies (the management board and the supervisory board) must be established.
Rights and duties of shareholders in an SA are similar to those described above in the context of SKAs. This also applies to possible additional rights vested with the general assembly.
If the SA is used as an investment vehicle, it constitutes an ASI, which is at the same time its own ZASI.
As a rule, distribution of securities (investment certificates in an FIZ and shares in an SKA or SA) constitutes regulated services and is restricted to investment firms. The applicable distribution rules and the scope of mandatory disclosure are in that case subject to Poland's local implementation regime for MiFID, including mandatory adequacy and appropriateness tests. However, if the investor is qualified as a professional or an eligible counterparty for MiFID purposes, MiFID duties are considerably limited.
It should be noted that pursuing activity of this type without the required permit could face criminal liability. If a criminal investigation is triggered by the actions of the KNF, the identity of the suspected entity is immediately disclosed on the KNF website.
Distribution of units in SFIOs is subject to the special legal regime of the IFA and its secondary legislation. Generally, such distribution may be entrusted both to regulated entities (banks, other investment firms, etc.) or non-regulated service providers, with the restriction that they have received a suitable permit issued by the KNF. The investor's orders related to the purchase and redemption of the units may be made through natural persons who cooperate with the above-mentioned distributors on the basis of an agency agreement. Such natural persons may not receive payments designated to buy units or transfer redemption proceeds. Distributors are liable for the actions performed by their agents.
The distribution of participation interests in Polish limited companies, as well as the limited partner's interests (neither of which qualifies as securities), are not subject to any specific legal framework.
Private equity investors could, in particular cases, be qualified as consumers. Business – consumer relationships fall under the applicable restrictions contained in the consumer law. While the Polish consumer protection requirements are generally in line with the applicable EU framework, the policy regarding their enforcement by the local consumer protection authorities and courts is relatively restrictive. Moreover, any marketing communication addressed to Polish consumers should always be drafted in a clear and precise manner in order not to confuse consumers. In addition, as a rule, under Polish consumer protection law, Polish must be used for all documents related to services provided to consumer clients residing in Poland.
iv Fiduciary duties
Pursuant to the IFA, an investment fund (this applies to both FIZs and SFIOs) must conduct its operations with due regard to the interests of the investor, and in keeping with the investment risk mitigation rules set out by the IFA. A TFI and the fund's depositary are also legally obliged to act independently and in the interest of investors.
If a TFI's actions taken in relation to the management of the fund are considered to be in breach of investors' interests, the TFI (and, arguably, the depositary) would be subject to quite restrictive regulatory sanctions imposed by the KNF.
The 2016 changes in law substantially extended the scope of depositaries' rights and obligations and generally strengthened the position of banks in the financial market. In the current regulatory framework depositaries are obliged not only to keep a given fund's assets and maintain their register, but also to monitor related cash flows. Additional duties were imposed on depositaries also in respect of the assets themselves: the depositary has to verify whether the assets are stored in duly maintained accounts (in particular whether the accounts are maintained by authorised entities) and whether the fund actually holds rights arising from non-equity instruments entered into the register of its assets. The depositary also ensures that agreements related to the fund's assets are settled without undue delay.
Additionally, depositaries are now expected to act as external compliance controllers for investment funds and are obliged to conduct regular reviews of their activity in this context. Depositaries have also been given the right (and obligation) to sue the relevant TFI at the request of an investor for damages caused by improper conduct of the relevant investment fund. Detailed rights and obligations of depositaries are regulated by agreements concluded by specific depositaries and TFIs.
These changes have had a significant impact on the market, with most TFIs and depositaries entering into new agreements in December 2016, to accommodate to the altered legal framework. These new agreements with depositaries were mostly based on standard contract terms for a depositary agreement developed under the auspices of the Polish Bank Association (Custodian Bank Council).
In the case of commercial companies, the introduction of the ASI regulatory framework imposed a number of fiduciary duties on the relevant ZASIs (i.e., general partners of a limited partnership or an SKA, or the capital companies themselves). ZASIs are required to apply roughly the same standards as investment funds and their managers (i.e., to act in a professional and sound manner, in accordance with fair market practice, and in the best interests of the investors). Additional duties could be specified either in the partnership deed, articles of association, or statutes, or in a separate investment agreement. Legal commentators emphasise, however, that all partners and shareholders have fiduciary duties in relation to the partnership itself.
iii REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS
i Current regulatory framework
The KNF is the competent authority within the meaning of the EU directives. It performs integrated regulatory supervision over local financial services (banking, insurance, pension fund and financial instruments markets, including the investment funds market).
The current regulatory regime applicable to private equity investments encompasses the establishment and operation of FIZs and SFIOs, as well as their management by TFIs, as well as, operation of ASIs and their management by ZASIs.
The creation of an investment fund requires:
a adoption of the FIZ's statutes by the TFI;
- execution of an agreement with a depositary on the maintenance of a register of the fund's assets;
- the KNF's authorisation for the establishment of an FIZ (with the reservation outlined below);
- collection of payments in the amount stipulated in the fund's statutes (in the case of publicly traded certificates, not less than €40,000); and
- entry in the register of investment funds.
The investment fund acquires legal personality upon its registration in the register of investment funds, which is maintained by the District Court of Warsaw. Upon registration, the management company becomes the governing body of the investment fund.
Establishment of an FIZ whose investment certificates are not publicly traded does not require KNF consent. In addition, the scope of KNF supervision over the operations of such a fund is considerably limited. The regulatory burden in this case is moved to supervision of the TFI.
The creation of an SFIO, open-end investment funds and public FIZs requires KNF authorisation and entry in the register of investment funds. At the same time, the SFIO is obliged to publish information prospectuses and financial statements.
Management of investment funds (including, as a rule, distribution of their units) is reserved to TFIs regulated under the IFA and its secondary legislation. Establishment of a TFI requires a regulatory permit. A permit to act as an investment fund management company may be granted only to a joint-stock company with a registered office in Poland. The scope of the permit covers activities consisting of the establishment and management of investment funds, including intermediation in the redemption or sale and repurchase of investment funds units or certificates, representing investment funds in dealings with third parties and managing a collective portfolio of securities.
The TFI must comply with certain specific requirements, including the capital adequacy requirement and the appointment of managers complying with certain conditions. The scope of activities of the TFI must be limited to the management of funds.
The operation of a commercial company classified as an ASI triggers certain regulatory duties, which are differentiated according to the value of the investment portfolio. Apart from ZAFI registration or permit requirements, if the company is to conduct itself as an ASI, one of the most important issues is that the KNF filing must be made during the commercial registration process, after the transition period discussed above. However, as stated above, subsequent 'requalification' of a commercial company as an ASI is no longer possible.
As of 1 January 2017, FIZs are no longer subject to a general corporate income tax (CIT) exemption, even though significant sources of their income are still exempt from CIT (e.g., dividends payable by capital companies). The latter exemption does not extend to participation in profits of tax-transparent entities (such as partnerships or their equivalents), interest payable by such entities or income derived from renting out a building under a lease agreement or an agreement of a similar nature, and also including such income derived through tax-transparent entities. In practice, this change will strongly affect FIZs involved in co-investments with banks (e.g., in real estate), which prefer to establish investment vehicles in the form of limited partnerships (see below) and act as limited partners.
Recent changes in CIT applicable to FIZs are equally applicable to SFIOs applying the investment principles and investment limits of an FIZ.
Investors in Polish investment funds are subject to income taxation with respect to proceeds received from the funds (the standard tax rate is 19 per cent, which in the case of foreign investors may be reduced on the basis of applicable double-tax treaties and internal regulations).
Importantly, as of 1 January 2019, ASIs' income derived from the sale of shares in a company is subject to CIT exemption, which applies if the ASI holds at least 10 per cent of the shares in the company's share capital for a period of no less than two years prior to the sale (the participation exemption). However, this exemption does not apply to the sale of shares in companies more than 50 per cent of whose assets consist of real properties.
iii MiFID II implementation
The Polish regulatory framework has recently undergone the MiFID II implementation. MiFID II has been implemented by the Act of 1 March 2018 amending the Act on Trading in Financial instruments and Certain Other Acts (including the IFA), which entered into force on 21 April 2018. The adoption of new regulations in this regard has generally impacted the private equity investment market, but in the first place it affected TFIs and distributors.
The regulatory changes brought about by the MIFID II implementation can be divided into three main streams: (1) limiting the TFIs' remuneration for the management of FIOs and SFIOs by making these dependent on the type of investment and the investment risk, (2) aligning the legal requirements for TFIs and investment firms providing certain portfolio management services, and (3) aligning the legal status of funds' units sale-and-redemption agency services with brokerage activity (accepting and forwarding orders to purchase or sell financial instruments).
Moreover, the MiFID II implementation introduced some important changes to the fundraising regulatory regimen, such as the introduction of new mandatory information requirements in relation to investors and new obligations on clients' asset protection.
The most widely debated issues in the Polish private equity market are currently the shape of the investment market after the MiFID II implementation (see above) and the future impact of the pension reforms introducing the employee capital plans (PPKs). PPKs are a new form of additional pension saving. The new pension system will be mandatory for employing entities and (theoretically) voluntary for the employed persons. The PPK system will broadly involve investment funds, as the introduction of a PPK requires the conclusion of a PPK management contract and a number of contracts for the operation of a PPK for employees, and these are matters that will have to be dealt with by investment funds.
Also worth mentioning are the significant changes to the IFA that will take place on 1 July 2019. These changes concern the obligatory dematerialisation of certain types of securities. The recently adopted Act of 9 November 2018 amends a series of laws, including the IFA, to strengthen financial supervision and investor protection. In this respect, the new Act introduces, among other things, the obligatory dematerialisation of corporate bonds, investment certificates issued by FIZs and covered bonds, irrespective of whether or not these securities are the subject of a public offer or intended for trading on any trading venue. The main purpose of these changes is to increase the transparency of the identity of the issuer and the volume of the issuance of these securities, as well as to strengthen investor protection and flexibility.
Although discussions are still taking place about the shape of the market following the 2016 implementation of the AIFMD and UCITS V11 Directives, there is no question that these changes to the regulatory regime put an end to the 'explosion' of FIZs in the Polish market that started with the 2011 deregulation. In turn, the changes in question have given rise to new trends within the currently existing financial structures involving FIZs.
1 Marcin Olechowski is a partner, Wojciech Iwański is a senior counsel and Mateusz Blocher is an associate at Sołtysiński Kawecki & Szlęzak.
2 CBRE, Dentons, PWC and Skansa, CEE Investment Report 2018: New Frontiers of Growth.
3 Focus Economics, Economic Snapshot for Central & Eastern Europe, 10 January 2018.
4 World Bank Press Release No. 2018/ECA/95.
5 World Bank, Global Economic Prospects: Darkening Skies, January 2019.
6 Invest Europe, 2017 Central and Eastern Europe Private Equity Statistics, June 2018.
9 In accordance with Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS).
10 The 2016 Act Amending the Act on Investment Funds and Certain Other Acts implements, among other directives, Directive 2011/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on alternative investment fund managers (AIFMD), and also Directive 2014/91/EU amending Directive 2009/65/EU on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) as regards depositary functions, remuneration policies and sanctions (UCITS V).
11 See footnotes 9 and 10.