In recent years, Hungary has been striving to attract foreign affluent individuals by reducing personal income tax and adopting other favourable measures for private individuals that we detail below.
In March 2014, a new Civil Code, which could significantly improve the legal environment for private wealth planning, entered into force. In this respect, the most significant development of the Civil Code is the Hungarian trust, which was incorporated into the Hungarian Civil Code and is expected to be a new stimulus for the Hungarian economy.2
Furthermore, wealth management foundations introduced in 2019 will provide additional private wealth planning opportunities.
i Personal income tax
Hungarian tax-resident status
The rules applicable to personal income tax (PIT) are set out in the Act of CXVII of 1995 on Personal Income Tax (the Act on PIT). According to Section 3 of the Act on PIT, the following should be regarded as being resident for PIT purposes in Hungary:
- Hungarian citizens;
- EEA nationals who spend at least 183 days per calendar year (including the day of entry and the day of exit) in Hungary; and
- third-country nationals who have a permanent residence permit or stateless status in Hungary.
Also, individuals qualify as being resident in Hungary for PIT purposes if:
- their only permanent home is in Hungary;
- their centre of vital interests is in Hungary if there is no permanent home in Hungary or if Hungary is not the only country where they have a permanent home; or
- their habitual abode is in the domestic territory if there is no permanent home in Hungary, or if Hungary is not the only country where they have a permanent home and if their centre of vital interests is unknown.
For the purpose of a permanent home, any form of home may be taken into account (e.g., a house or apartment belonging to or rented by the individual, a rented furnished room). However, the permanence of the home is essential; this means that the individual has arranged to have a dwelling available to him or her at all times continuously, and not occasionally for the purpose of a stay that, owing to the reasons for it, is necessarily of a short duration (e.g., business travel, educational travel). To substantiate that the individual has a permanent home in Hungary, it is usually required to have at least a rented flat for which he or she is paying utility, telephone and internet bills.
As regards the notion of centre of vital interest, the Hungarian tax authority largely follows the OECD Commentary and claims that the centre of vital interest is the country with which the personal and economic relations of the individual are closer. Thus, his or her family and social relations, occupation, political, cultural and other activities, place of business, and the place from which he or she administers his or her properties should be considered. The circumstances must be examined as a whole, but considerations based on the personal circumstances of the individual (e.g., close family relatives living in the same household) must receive special attention.
Hungarian tax residents are subject to income tax on worldwide income, regardless of whether the funds are transferred to Hungary. Non-residents are taxed on income from Hungarian sources only.
Hungarian PIT treatment of interest, dividend income and capital gains
We summarise the Hungarian PIT treatment of certain passive income earned by Hungarian tax residents below.
Hungarian resident individuals are subject to PIT on their worldwide income, including interest income.
It may occur that the source country of the interest income imposes a withholding tax on the same income. To eliminate double taxation, the Hungarian domestic legislation grants credit for the taxes paid abroad. The maximum amount of the tax credit would be subject to certain limitations. If there is a double tax treaty in force between the two countries concerned, the relevant double tax treaty rules will apply to eliminate double taxation.3
Interest income of a Hungarian-resident private individual will be subject to Hungarian PIT at a rate of 15 per cent in 2019.
The Act on PIT applies a broad definition of interest income; in connection with publicly offered and traded debt securities and collective investments in transferable securities, interest shall mean the following:
- the income paid to the private individual under the title of interest or yield, if the securities are held at a specific time prescribed as a precondition for entitlement to interest or yield; and
- in certain cases, the capital gains achieved when securities are called, redeemed or transferred. In connection with collective investments in transferable securities, redemption shall also cover when the securities are exchanged upon the transformation or merger of the investment fund for the investment certificates of the successor fund. Gains from the transfer of collective investments in transferable securities in certain qualified exchange markets or in a market of an EU, EEA or OECD state will not qualify as interest income, but will be considered as income from capital gains for Hungarian tax law purposes.
In the event that the interest income is paid in the form of valuable assets (e.g., securities) and the Hungarian paying agent cannot withhold the relevant tax, the taxable base would be assessed in the amount of the fair market value of the asset received multiplied by 1.18.
If the interest income is received from a Hungarian paying agent, such paying agent should withhold the PIT. If the interest income is not received from a paying agent, taxes should be assessed, declared and paid to the tax authority by the private individual himself in his or her regular annual tax return.
Payments distributed by or on behalf of a legal person or other organisation having its seat in a low tax jurisdiction4 are subject to PIT at a 15 per cent rate and the recipient should pay social tax of 19.5 per cent, in addition to the PIT. However, the legislation does not provide for any adverse tax implications in respect of interest received from controlled foreign companies5 (CFC) because the definition of the low tax jurisdiction does not cover CFCs.
The dividend income of a Hungarian resident private individual is subject to PIT at a rate of 15 per cent and social tax at the rate of 19.5 per cent in 2019 (the latter is capped at 697,320 forints in 2019).
Dividend payments distributed by or on behalf of a legal person or other organisation having its seat in a low tax jurisdiction are subject to PIT at a 15 per cent rate and the recipient should pay social tax of 19.5 per cent in addition to PIT.
Capital gains realised by a Hungarian-resident private individual will be subject to PIT at a rate of 15 per cent and social tax at a rate of 19.5 per cent in 2019 (the latter is capped at 697,320 forints in 2019).
Capital gains arising from the sale of shares in a legal person or other organisation having its seat in a low tax jurisdiction would be subject to PIT at 15 per cent and social tax at 19.5 per cent.6
On certain conditions, preferential PIT rules may apply to income from the 'controlled capital market transactions' of private individuals.
Income from 'controlled capital market transactions' shall be calculated as the difference between the total profit and the total loss realised on transactions during the tax year. In 2019, a 15 per cent PIT rate would apply on that income. Because of the preferential tax treatment of 'controlled capital market transactions', the private individual could be entitled to tax compensation with respect to losses realised from controlled capital market transactions during the tax year, during the year preceding the current tax year and in the two years preceding the current tax year. Tax 'calculated' for such losses could reduce the taxes calculated on gains realised by the private individual from controlled capital market transactions during the tax year, during the year preceding the current tax year and in the two years preceding the current tax year.
Furthermore, in cases of transfer of shares in a Hungarian real estate holding company as defined by the Act LXXXI of 1996 on the Corporate Income Tax and Dividend Tax, a charge to Hungarian PIT (15 per cent) arises at the foreign shareholder in respect of any income triggered on the transfer of shares in a real estate holding company unless the applicable double tax convention excludes the taxation of such capital gains in Hungary.7
Income from qualified long-term investments
Preferential tax rules may apply to income from 'qualified long-term investments' of private individuals.
Income derived from qualified long-term investments refers to the profit the private individual realises under a long-term investment contract entered into with an investment service provider or a credit institution. Under the long-term investment contract, the private individual places an amount equal to at least 25,000 forints on his or her account for a minimum period of three (and further two) years, and the parties agree on applying the preferential taxation rules laid down by the Act on PIT. If all the conditions prescribed by law are fulfilled and the 'qualified long-term investment' is held for less than three years, for the 2019 tax year a 15 per cent rate may apply, while if the investment lasts at least three years, a preferential 10 per cent rate is applicable; income from qualified long-term investments would be subject to a zero per cent rate if the investment is held for at least five years. Under certain conditions, the above beneficiary tax rules may also extend to foreign qualified long-term investments, where the investment service provider or the credit institution is not subject to Hungarian data disclosure requirements.
ii Inheritance tax and gift tax8
The inheritance of assets located in Hungary would be subject to Hungarian inheritance tax regardless of the nationality of the heirs. If the inheritance is handed over during a probate action then the tax authority assesses the inheritance tax and informs the heirs regarding the tax payable.
The base of the inheritance tax and the gift tax is the net value of the inheritance or gift, which is the market value of properties inherited or gifted less any liabilities related to the inheritance or gift.
The generally applicable inheritance and gift tax rate is 18 per cent. However, a preferential 9 per cent tax rate applies to residential properties. In the case of vehicles, the inheritance and gift tax are double the transfer tax. Special rules apply in cases of inheritance of beneficiary ownership over real estate properties or rights with pecuniary value.
Hungarian legislation provides for exemption from inheritance and gift tax in several cases, such as the following:
- succession and gift by and to lineal relatives or a spouse is exempt from inheritance and gift tax;
- if the heir is a stepchild, step-parent, foster child or foster parent of the deceased, 20 million forints from the tax base qualifies as a tax-exempt inheritance;
- the inheritance and gifting of debt securities issued by a European Economic Area (EEA) Member State;
- inheritance that has been granted for scientific, artistic or educational purposes; and
- if the heir or recipient undertakes to build a residential property within four years after the succession or gifting and the total territory of the flats in this residential property is at least 10 per cent of the maximum build-in territory, the inheritance or gifting of the land would be exempt from inheritance or gift tax. To become eligible for this exemption, the heir or recipient should file a statement to the tax authority. The tax authority will assess after four years whether the heir or recipient has fulfilled all obligations related to the tax exemption. In case of non-compliance, the heir or recipient should pay inheritance or gift tax, plus the amount of the late payment interest.
If the heir offers any fine art, applied art or folk art creation, or museum piece, collection or a part of it that he or she has inherited to the Hungarian state, municipality or higher education institution and it has been accepted by the recipient, then the inheritance or the offered part of the inheritance is exempt from inheritance tax.
In cases of underage heirs, the inheritance tax may be payable without any late payment interest until the end of the second calendar year from the date they have reached maturity. If the underage heirs pay their inheritance tax liability in advance then the amount of tax should be decreased by 10 per cent to 70 per cent.
In case of the inheritance of the ownership of arable land or rights with pecuniary value relating to the arable land, the applicable tax rate is half (and in certain cases one-quarter) of the general tax rate.
iii Transfer tax9
Transfer tax is payable upon the acquisition of real estate property, movable property on auctions, cars and trailers, rights of pecuniary value (e.g., rights related to real estate, cars), usufruct on real estates, building structures in public places and acquisition of securities by means of contract of inheritance.
Since 2010, the acquisition of shares in a real estate holding company is also subject to real estate transfer tax (RETT), provided that the ownership of the acquirer reaches 75 per cent of the company that holds the real estate in Hungary. Under transfer tax legislation, an entity should be regarded as a real estate holding company if the value of the real estate in Hungary owned by that entity exceeds 75 per cent of the total value of the assets (excluding liquid assets, monetary claims, accruals and loans) of the entity shown on the balance sheet that was most recently formally approved. An entity should also be regarded as a real estate holding entity if it holds directly or indirectly at least 75 per cent of shares in a company that fulfils the above conditions.
The standard rate of RETT is 4 per cent of the market value of the acquired real estate. If the market value of a real estate property exceeds 1 billion forints, the rate of the RETT on the exceeding part is 2 per cent, but the RETT liability is capped at 200 million forints per real estate property.
iv Property taxes
Local municipalities may levy tax on buildings. The maximum of the building tax is either 1,100 forints per square metre (adjusted with cumulated inflation) or 3.6 per cent of the adjusted fair market value of building.
Land tax may be levied by local municipalities on the owner of the land. The land tax is either charged annually based on the area of land owned, at a maximum rate of 200 forints per square metre (adjusted with cumulated inflation) or based on the adjusted fair market value of the land, at a maximum of 3 per cent.
i Hungarian succession rules
The respective rules of Hungarian succession law are set out in the Civil Code.10
The main rule of Hungarian succession law is that the heirs acquire the inheritance by the mere fact of the death of the deceased person.11 Accordingly, the heirs become the owner of the properties at the time of death; however, they are not entitled to exercise their rights relating to the inheritance (e.g., to register their ownership in the land registry) until the notary public has rendered a binding resolution on the handover of the heritage during the probate action. Therefore, the aim of the probate action is to identify the properties of the deceased person and to clarify the inheritance relationships and make a resolution regarding the succession. In the event of any dispute concerning the resolution of the notary public, each of the interested persons could challenge the resolution before the court.
Under Hungarian law, the inheritance takes place either according to a disposition of property upon death or in accordance with the statutory rules.12 If there is a disposition of property upon death at hand it must prevail over the statutory regime.13 A disposition of property upon death could cover either the entire heritage or some part of the estate of the deceased person.14 If the disposition of property upon death does not cover the entire heritage, the statutory regime of inheritance applies in respect of the remaining parts.15
Inheritance by disposition of property upon death
In case of the disposition of property upon death, the Civil Code provides for the formal requirements and the eligible terms of such dispositions. The Civil Code distinguishes between last will, contract of succession and donation upon death.
Besides the public will that is made in the presence of a notary, the Civil Code recognises private wills (including the holographic will and other forms of last wills made in writing) and oral wills.16 An oral will is valid only if a danger threatening the testator with death hinders him in making a last will in writing and if two witnesses are present.17 The Civil Code introduced a new feature to Hungarian succession law, namely the joint will. Under Hungarian law, only spouses may make a joint will.18
In the framework of a contract of succession, the testator makes a disposition of property upon death in favour of the other contracting party, while this other party is obliged to provide either maintenance or periodic payment of any other sum or services of care to the testator.19
The rules on reserved share represent, however, a significant limitation to the autonomy of the testator. The descendants, the spouse or the registered partner and the parents of the deceased can claim their reserved share if they inherit in the absence of any disposition of property upon death.20
Inheritance by law
Under the statutory regime of succession, the estate of the deceased must be distributed among his or her relatives and spouse or registered partner in accordance with the strict order of succession set out in the Civil Code. Children and their descendants constitute the first category, followed by the parents and their descendants.21 Then comes the category of grandparents and their descendants, which is followed by the category of great-grandparents and their descendants, and finally the ancestors of the great-grandparents.22 However, the category of grandparents and their descendants may inherit only if the spouse or the registered partner could not be the heir of the deceased.23 Relatives within a category inherit in equal shares.24
Prior to the new rules of the Civil Code, the spouse or the registered partner was only able to inherit usufruct over the estate of the deceased. Under the new rules, if at least a child or a descendant of a child is an heir, both the spouse or the registered partner inherit usufruct over the residential property and its equipment used together with the deceased and a share of the rest of the inheritance corresponding with the share of a child.25 If there is neither child nor a descendant of a child, the spouse or the registered partner inherits the residential property and its equipment that was used together with the deceased, and half of the rest of the inheritance, while the parents of the deceased inherit the other half of the rest of the inheritance.26 If there is neither child nor descendant of a child nor parent, the spouse or the registered partner inherits the entire estate.27
If the heir is not a descendant of the deceased, there is a special regime of succession with respect to the assets the deceased inherited or received as a gift either directly or indirectly (through his or her brother or sister or any of the descendants of the aforementioned).28 In this case, only those persons who provided the asset to the deceased or whose ancestor provided the asset to the deceased can inherit. The spouse or the registered partner has usufruct over the respective assets in this case.29 If no one can inherit the assets under this regime, the general rules of inheritance by law apply.30
ii Matrimonial issues
The respective Hungarian rules of matrimonial property are set out in the Civil Code. The basic rule is that unless the spouses conclude a matrimonial property agreement, the rules of the statutory matrimonial property regime prevail.31
The statutory matrimonial property regime
The rules of the statutory matrimonial property regime apply only during the life of the spouses as a couple in the same household once they have concluded a marriage.32 These rules no longer apply if: (1) the spouses conclude a matrimonial property agreement; (2) the court terminates the matrimonial common property during the spouses' life as a couple; or (3) the spouses no longer live together.33
Under the statutory matrimonial property regime, the assets the spouses had before their marriage belong to their own separate estates.34 Additionally, inter alia, the assets inherited or received as a gift, IP rights and the surrogate of the assets belonging to the separate estate constitute the parts of the spouses' separate estates.35 The assets acquired during the spouses' life as a couple constitutes common property.36 Both of the spouses may use the common property and manage and administer these assets together.37 This rule has limited application in respect to shares, shareholdings and the assets necessary for the business or other profession of one of the spouses.38 Under this regime, each spouse is liable to third parties for the performance and the breach of any contracts concerning any common property limited to their shares in the common property.39
Matrimonial property agreements
The Civil Code contains two types of model rules in respect of matrimonial property agreements. This means that unless a mandatory rule prohibits the derogation from these rules, the parties could agree otherwise.40 The spouses could limit their liability with respect to their common property towards third parties under the matrimonial property agreement if they register the agreement in the appropriate registry.41
Under one model regime, both of the spouses have their own separate estates and each of them is entitled to half of the assets acquired during their life as a couple.42 Under the other model regime, both of the spouses have their own separate estates and they have to bear only the costs of the common household and the education of the children together.43 Deviation from the obligation to bear these costs is not allowed.44
Partners and registered partners
The assets of partners living together outside marriage remain their own separate estates, and upon the end of their relationship as a couple, each of them can claim a part of the assets acquired during their life as a couple corresponding to the respective partner's contribution in the acquisition of those assets.45 The partners can deviate from these rules by an agreement.46
Although same-sex marriage is not available in Hungary, homosexual couples may register their relationship as set out in the Registered Partnership Act.47 The rules of succession and matrimonial property applicable in respect to marriage and spouses also apply to the registered partnership and registered partners.48
IV WEALTH STRUCTURING AND REGULATION
i Hungarian trusts
The Civil Code provides for new rules for Hungarian trusts and private foundations.
The introduction of trusts represents dramatic improvements in wealth structuring in Hungary.49 While the Civil Code contains the rules on the relationship between the settlor, the trustee and the beneficiary, the Trustees Act provides for the regulatory framework for providing such services.
The relationship between the settlor, the trustee and the beneficiary
The Civil Code sets out the rules on trusts within the rules of contract law. The Civil Code provides that the parties are free to deviate from the rules of contract law regarding their rights and obligations, unless the statute does not allow any derogation.50 Hence, the statutory rules of trust as set out in the Civil Code are mostly model rules.51 There are five trust-specific mandatory rules where a derogation is not allowed:
- the trust arrangement needs to be in writing;
- the trustee should not be the sole beneficiary;
- the trust assets need to be separated from the trustee's own assets and other trust assets;
- neither the settlor nor the beneficiary may give instructions to the trustee; and
- the term of the trust arrangement may not exceed 50 years.52
A trust arrangement could be established either by a contract between the settlor and the trustee or by a unilateral declaration of the settlor or by a testament.53
In the framework of the trust under Hungarian law, the settlor transfers the title of the property or assigns rights and claims to the trustee. The trustee is obliged to manage the transferred trust assets in his or her own name and for the benefit of the beneficiary, while the settlor shall pay a fee for the trust management to the trustee.54 The beneficiary may claim the distribution of the trust assets and their profits in accordance with the trust deed.55
Under the trust arrangement, the trustee is obliged to act for the utmost benefit of the beneficiary's interests in accordance with the fiduciary nature of the trust.56 The trustee is liable for the trust assets as well as the performance of the obligations incurred.57 The trustee could dispose over the trust assets in accordance with the terms specified in the trust deed.58 The trustee has the right to remuneration and reimbursement in respect to the expenditures out of the trust assets.59
One of the major issues of trusts is the position of the creditors. In light of the following rules, the Hungarian trust is an effective asset protection vehicle.
The creditors of the trustee may not enforce any claim against the trust assets and the trust assets do not belong to the inheritance of the trustee.60 The creditors of the beneficiary may enforce claims on the trust assets only if the trustee's obligation to transfer the trust assets to the beneficiary is due.61 The creditors of the settlor can pursue claims against the trust assets only if the settlor aimed at avoiding payment of the debts in question by setting up the trust (actio pauliana or fraudulent conveyance) where the burden of proof rests with the creditors.62 Furthermore, if the creditor tries to enforce a foreign judgment brought by the court of a non-EU country, the Hungarian authorities may refuse to recognise and to enforce such a judgment provided that:
- there is no international treaty between the jurisdiction of the court and Hungary regarding the enforcement and recognition of judgments; and
- there is no reciprocity regarding assistance in such cases.
Moreover, tracing is one of the most significant issues that the law needs to address with regard to trusts. Under Hungarian law, if the trustee was in breach of the trust deed by alienating or encumbering the trust assets, the settlor and the beneficiary could claim from third parties, who were not in good faith or acquired the assets free of charge, the transfer of the assets back to the trust assets.63 The trust terminates if:
- the trust assets cease to exist;
- the trustee gives notice;
- there is no trustee with respect to the trust assets for a period exceeding three months;
- the settlor is the sole beneficiary in the event that the settlor dies;
- the settlor gives notice with regard to a contract entered into for an indefinite period; or
- 50 years have passed since the establishment of the trust.64
It is not sufficient grounds to terminate the trust if the settlor becomes the legal successor of the trustee.65 In the event that any of the settlors, the trustee or the beneficiary dies or ceases to exist, the trust would still continue to exist.66
Taking account of the above model rules, it was concluded in the academic literature that the concept of trust under Hungarian law corresponds with the definition of trust as defined in the Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Trusts and Their Recognition.67
Regulatory framework of trusts
The Trustees Act provides specifically for licensing, notification and registration requirements.
To manage two or more trusts as a trustee, namely, on a business scale, a licence from the National Bank of Hungary (MNB) is necessary.68 Such a licensed trustee could be a limited liability company, a joint stock company or the branch of an EEA undertaking. The licensed trustee needs to meet certain transparency criteria and must have registered capital of at least 70 million forints.69 Additionally, the licensed trustee must have financial collateral of a value corresponding to at least 20 per cent of the trust assets, but ranging from 70 million to 1.5 billion forints.70 The legislation also prescribes conditions with respect to the managing directors of the trustee.
In the event that the trustee accepts the appointment on an ad hoc basis and not on a business scale, the trustee is required to notify the MNB.71
Taxation of trusts
As a general rule, the transfer of the assets between the private individual settlor and the trustee should be tax-neutral as it does not trigger any tax liability in Hungary:72 any properties (e.g., real estate, shares in a company) can be transferred into the trust without incurring any tax obligations, which may arise only when the assets and their yields are allotted to the beneficiaries.73
For corporate income tax purposes, the trust assets (managed assets) are considered a corporate income taxpayer.74 This means that any tax benefits granted to Hungarian tax-resident entities are also available for trust assets. Therefore, trusts can be used for various domestic and international tax planning purposes (e.g., making use of favourable rules of holding regimes, tax-neutral company restructurings, asset transfers, eliminating related party classifications).
In cases of distribution, the managed assets must be categorised as capital and yield. If the trustee distributes the capital to a beneficiary, a gift tax liability may arise, unless the beneficiary is the settlor or the spouse or a lineal relative of the settlor. If the yield of assets is distributed to the beneficiary, the beneficiary is obliged to pay PIT in accordance with the rules applicable to dividends.75
Based on the above, the Hungarian trust structure may provide significant tax saving opportunities if the settlor aims at transferring assets, which would otherwise result in a high capital gain.
Fields of use
Besides tax planning and asset protection opportunities, trusts may be used for several purposes, such as:
- maintaining and preserving family businesses combined with professional asset management expertise to be able to continue the family business successfully;
- deviating from statutory inheritance rules as an alternative and more flexible solution to testaments (e.g., for avoiding collisions in case of cross-border scenarios);
- providing representation for the beneficiaries; and
- establishing joint ventures and performing share acquisitions for collateral purposes.
ii Hungarian wealth management foundations
Hungary has been striving to boost inbound foreign investments and to keep domestic capital at home by – among other measures – introducing, in recognition of the economic need to separate the legal ownership of assets from enjoying the benefits stemming therefrom, the Hungarian trust as an investment, asset protection and estate planning arrangement that is an alternative to using foreign structures. In addition to the Hungarian trust, wealth management foundations were introduced to Hungarian law in 2019, in pursuit of the aforementioned goals.
Set-up and organisation of wealth management foundations
The wealth management foundation is a legal entity established for a definite or indefinite duration with the purpose of managing the assets granted to it by the founder or founders and to distribute assets and the proceeds of its wealth management activity to the beneficiaries.76 The foundation can be established with an initial endowment amounting to at least 600 million forints.77 The guiding principles of the management of assets granted to the foundation should be stated in an investment policy.78
The foundation is governed by a board consisting of at least five private individuals (neither the founder nor his or her relatives are precluded from being a board member).79 The foundation is required to appoint a statutory auditor and to have a supervisory board consisting of at least three private individuals.80 Furthermore, if the board was designated to exercise the rights of the founder or if the latter were transferred to the foundation then a protector should be appointed to supervise the exercise of these rights and that the management of the assets complies with the foundation's purpose.81
Asset protection afforded by wealth management foundations
The wealth management foundation could be used for asset protection purposes because the founder's creditors could only lay claim to assets managed by the foundation if these were transferred to it by the founder fraudulently, in order to avoid settling debts by diminishing the assets. Moreover, the creditors of the beneficiary may only seek to settle their claims from assets managed by the foundation if the foundation's obligation to transfer assets to the beneficiary is due.
Taxation of wealth management foundations
According to a legislative proposal T/6351 submitted by the Hungarian government on 4 June 2019, the following tax regime would apply to wealth management foundations. The wealth management foundation would qualify as a corporate income taxpayer meaning that any tax benefits granted to Hungarian tax-resident entities are also available for trust assets. Therefore, the wealth management foundation – similar to the Hungarian trust – could be used for various domestic and international tax planning purposes (e.g., making use of favourable rules of holding regimes, tax-neutral company restructurings, asset transfers, eliminating related party classifications).
In cases of distribution from a wealth management foundation that only manages assets transferred to it by private individuals, the managed assets must be categorised as capital and yield. If the wealth management foundation distributes the yield of assets to the beneficiary, the beneficiary would be obliged to pay taxes in accordance with the rules applicable to dividends. In contrast, the distribution of capital to a beneficiary is, as a general rule, exempt from PIT; however, a gift tax liability may arise at the beneficiary.
V Outlook and CONCLUSIONS
Based on the above developments, it is clear that Hungary has made a great leap towards being an attractive location for high net worth individuals. The new Hungarian trust represents a significant improvement in terms of private wealth management and for the private wealth industry in Hungary, and could be a stimulus for the Hungarian economy.
Besides domestic legislative changes, Hungary is very much exposed to international trends, such as OECD BEPS, AEOI and EU anti-avoidance. In 2014, Hungary ratified the Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters along with the Protocol amending the Convention.82 Furthermore, in 2015, Hungary became a party to the Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement on Automatic Exchange of Financial Accounts Information,83 implemented the DAC2 Directive84 and the 4th AML Directive.85 Hungary is also among the signatories to the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (MLI) and is committed to implementing the MLI minimum standards into its bilateral tax treaties. In addition, in compliance with Council Directive (EU) 2016/1164 of 12 July 2016 laying down rules against tax avoidance practices that directly affect the functioning of the internal market (ATAD), Hungary has already modified its regulation regarding CFCs, thin capitalisation and the general anti-avoidance rule and will transpose the other anti-avoidance measures of ATAD in 2019. Furthermore, Hungary will implement anti-hybrid rules86 and the DAC6 Directive regarding mandatory disclosure rules in respect of certain cross-border tax arrangements in 2019.87
1 Janos Pasztor is a senior associate heading the tax practice group at Wolf Theiss Budapest.
2 I Sándor, 'Gondolatok a bizalmi vagyonkezelés szabályozásáról az új Ptk.-ban' (Thoughts on the regulation of trust in the new Civil Code) (2013) available at: http://ptk2013.hu/szakcikkek/sandor-istvan-gondolatok-a-bizalmi-vagyonkezeles-szabalyozasarol-az-uj-ptk-ban/2355
3 Hungary has several double tax treaties (DTTs) with countries that include the European Union, the Balkans, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, San Marino and Switzerland, Belarus, Moldova, Russia, Ukraine, the countries of the Caucasus, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, Canada, the United States, Mexico, Brazil and Uruguay. There are DTTs in place with India, Pakistan, Vietnam, Thailand, Taipei, Hong Kong, China, Mongolia, South Korea, Japan, the Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Australia. Hungary also has DTTs with African countries, namely, South Africa, Morocco, Tunisia and Egypt. In recent years, Hungary ratified DTTs with more countries of the Middle East, i.e., with Bahrain, Iran, Israel, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates and Oman. Additionally, Hungary has ratified tax information exchange agreements with Jersey and Guernsey.
4 Low tax jurisdiction means a state that refrains from imposing CIT or if the tax rate thereof is 9 per cent or lower, unless Hungary has concluded a Double Tax Convention with such state.
5 Under Hungarian tax legislation, CFCs are foreign persons not qualifying as foreign entrepreneurs or Hungarian resident taxpayers, in which the taxpayer (either on its own, or with its related parties) – directly or indirectly – holds more than 50 per cent interest (shareholdings or voting rights) or is entitled to a share of after-tax profit exceeding 50 per cent thereof in the financial year, in which the tax equivalent to the CIT paid by the foreign legal entity is less than the difference with which the CIT that it would have paid assuming that its seat were in Hungary exceeds the tax equivalent to the CIT paid by the foreign legal entity (i.e., CIT paid by the foreign person is less than 50 per cent of the Hungarian CIT that the foreign entity should have paid in Hungary if it were a Hungarian taxpayer). The Hungarian tax legislation also regards foreign permanent establishments of a Hungarian resident taxpayer to be a CFC if in the tax year, in which the tax paid by the foreign permanent establishment is less than the difference with which – assuming that the permanent establishment was located in Hungary – the CIT that it would have paid exceeds the tax equivalent to the CIT paid by the foreign permanent establishment. The foreign legal entity or the foreign permanent establishment should not be considered as a CFC if it draws income only from genuine arrangements in the tax year concerned, or if its pre-tax profits do not exceed 244 million forints (whereof passive income does not exceed 24 million forints) or its pre-tax profits do not exceed 10 per cent of its operating costs, provided, in each of these cases, that additional conditions are met. Furthermore, a foreign permanent establishment located in a non-EEA country does not qualify as a CFC if the relevant double tax convention between Hungary and this non-EEA country exempts income attributable to the permanent establishment from taxation in Hungary.
6 Based on legislative proposal T/6441 accepted by the Parliament of Hungary on 12 June 2019, the 19.5 per cent social tax rate will be reduced to 17.5 per cent from 1 July 2019.
7 As of 1 January 2018, a new double tax convention entered into force between Luxembourg and Hungary, which allows for Hungary to tax the capital gain arising for a Luxembourg resident individual or entity upon the alienation of shares in a Hungarian real estate holding company.
8 Act XCIII of 1990 on Duties.
9 Act XCIII of 1990 on Duties.
10 Act V of 2013 of the Civil Code.
11 Sections 7:1 and 7:87 of the Civil Code.
12 Section 7:3(1) of the Civil Code.
13 Section 7:3(2) of the Civil Code.
14 Section 7:10 of the Civil Code.
15 Section 7:30 of the Civil Code.
16 Sections 7:13 to 7:17 and 7:20 of the Civil Code.
17 Sections 7:20 and 7:21 of the Civil Code.
18 Section 7:23 of the Civil Code.
19 Section 7:48(1) of the Civil Code.
20 Section 7:75 of the Civil Code.
21 Sections 7:55(1) and (3), 7:63(1) and (2) of the Civil Code.
22 Sections 7:64(1) and (2), 7:65(1) and (2) and 7:66 of the Civil Code.
23 Section 7:64(1) of the Civil Code.
24 Sections 7:55(2), 7:63(1), 7:64(1), 7:65(1) and 7:66 of the Civil Code.
25 Section 7:58(1) of the Civil Code.
26 Section 7:60 of the Civil Code.
27 Section 7:61 of the Civil Code.
28 Section 7:67(1) and (2) of the Civil Code.
29 Section 7:69(1) of the Civil Code.
30 Section 7:68(3) of the Civil Code.
31 Section 4:34(2) of the Civil Code.
32 Section 4:35(1) of the Civil Code.
33 Section 4:53 of the Civil Code.
34 Section 4:38(1)(a) of the Civil Code.
35 Sections 4:38(1)(b), (c) and (f) of the Civil Code.
36 Section 4:37(1) (a) of the Civil Code.
37 Sections 4:42(1) and (2) of the Civil Code.
38 Section 4:43 of the Civil Code.
39 Section 4:49 of the Civil Code.
40 Section 4:63(2) of the Civil Code.
41 Section 4:65(2) of the Civil Code.
42 Sections 4:69–4:71(2) of the Civil Code.
43 Sections 4:72–4:73(2) of the Civil Code.
44 Section 4:73(2) of the Civil Code.
45 Section 6:516 of the Civil Code.
46 Section 6:515 of the Civil Code.
47 Act XXIX of 2009 on the Registered Partnership.
48 Section 3(1) of the Registered Partnership Act.
49 The Civil Code and Act XV of 2014 on the Trustees and the Rules of Their Activities.
50 Section 6:59(2) of the Civil Code.
51 A Menyhei, 'Development of the estate planning industry through the introduction of the trust in Hungary' (2016) 22 Trusts & Trustees 659, 662.
52 Sections 6:310(2), 6:311(4), 6:312(1), 6:316 and 6:326(3) of the Civil Code; A Menyhei, 'Estate Planning in Hungary: Private Foundation or Trust?' (2015) 21 Trusts & Trustees 650, 652.
53 Sections 6:310(1) and 6:329(1) and (2) of the Civil Code.
54 Section 6:310(1) of the Civil Code.
55 Section 6:314(1) of the Civil Code.
56 Section 6:317(1) of the Civil Code.
57 Section 6:323(1) of the Civil Code.
58 Section 6:318(2) of the Civil Code.
59 Section 6:322(2) of the Civil Code.
60 Section 6:313(1) of the Civil Code.
61 Section 6:314(2) of the Civil Code.
62 Section 6:120 of the Civil Code.
63 Section 6:318(3) of the Civil Code.
64 Sections 6:326(1) and (3) of the Civil Code.
65 Section 6:326(4) of the Civil Code.
66 Section 6:326(5) of the Civil Code.
67 The Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Trusts and on Their Recognition (1985); A Menyhei, 'Development of the estate planning industry through the introduction of the trust in Hungary' (2016) 22 Trusts & Trustees 659, 661.
68 Section 3(1) of the Trustees Act.
69 Sections 3(1) and 7(2) of the Trustees Act.
70 Section 2(1) of the Decree of the Government No. 87 of 20 March 2014 on Certain Rules on the Financial Collaterals of Trustee Undertakings.
71 Section 19 of the Trustees Act.
72 Section 17/D of the Act XCIII of 1990 on Stamp Duties; A Menyhei, 'Estate Planning in Hungary: Private Foundation or Trust?' (2015) 21 Trusts & Trustees 650, 651.
73 Section 17/D(2) of the Act XCIII of 1990 on Stamp Duties.
74 Section 2(6) of the Act LXXXI of 1996 on Corporate Tax and Dividend Tax.
75 Section 66(1)(a)(ae) of the Act of CXVII of 1995 on Personal Income Tax.
76 Section 2(1) of Act XIII of 2019 on Wealth Management Foundations.
77 Section 3(1) of the Act on Wealth Management Foundations.
78 Section 9 of the Act on Wealth Management Foundations.
79 Sections 6(1) and 4(4) of the Act on Wealth Management Foundations.
80 Section 6(2) of the Act on Wealth Management Foundations.
81 Section 7(1) of the Act on Wealth Management Foundations.
82 Act XLII of 2014 on the Promulgation of the Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters.
83 Act CXC of 2015 on the Promulgation of the Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement on Automatic Exchange of Financial Accounts Information. Hungary will exchange financial account information (such as data identifying the beneficiary owner, data on the assets and revenues, etc.) with the following countries: Andorra, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Faroe Islands, Finland, France, Germany, Gibraltar, Greece, Greenland, Guernsey, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Isle of Man, Italy, Japan, Jersey, Korea, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Malta, Mauritius, Mexico, Monaco, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Pakistan, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, San Marino, Saudi Arabia, Seychelles, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom. Exchanges take place since September 2017 (except for some countries, e.g., Australia, Brazil, Canada and Japan, with which information has been exchanged since September 2018).
84 Council Directive 2014/107/EU of 9 December 2014 amending Directive 2011/16/EU as regards mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation, OJ L 359, 16.12.2014, page 1.
85 Directive 2015/849 of 20 May 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, amending Regulation (EU) No. 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directive 2006/70/EC.
86 Council Directive (EU) 2017/952 of 29 May 2017 amending Directive (EU) 2016/1164 as regards hybrid mismatches with third countries.
87 Council Directive (EU) 2018/822 of 25 May 2018 amending Directive 2011/16/EU as regards mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation in relation to reportable cross-border arrangements.