In Taiwan, public-private partnership (PPP) schemes were prescribed under several laws before the Statute for Encouragement of Private Participation in Transportation Infrastructure Projects was enacted in 1994. The Statute for Encouragement of Private Participation in Transportation Infrastructure Projects covers only transportation infrastructure, which is supervised by the Ministry of Transportation. Taiwan High Speed Rail is a representative project of transportation infrastructure subsidised by the Statute for Encouragement of Private Participation in Transportation Infrastructure Projects.
As PPPs became popular in Taiwan, Taiwan strove to create a hospitable environment for PPPs through statutory enactments and amendments. In 2000, the Act for Promotion of Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects (PPIP Act) was enacted, covering various types of infrastructure, for example, transportation facilities and common conduits, environmental pollution prevention, water supply, and sanitation facilities. The PPIP Act not only establishes a set of fair bidding procedures but also offers many incentives, such as favourable rentals or tax exemptions.
Besides the PPIP Act, there are other laws governing private participation in specific infrastructure projects, including the Mass Rapid Transit Act, the National Property Act, the Local Government Public Property Administration Act, the Commercial Port Act, and the Electricity Act. Together, the different objectives and operating guidelines of those laws create a sound legal environment that has fostered many accomplishments through the united efforts of government agencies. However, the PPIP Act governs most PPP projects in Taiwan. Meanwhile, even when the PPIP Act does not apply in some projects, Article 99 of the Government Procurement Act may apply to the procedures by which an entity selects an investor to construct or operate a project approved by the competent authority for private investment, provided that the project is one in transportation, energy, environmental protection, tourism, and planned or approved by the government. But the benefits under the PPIP Act, such as favourable rentals or tax exemptions, will not apply.
There are various ways for private entities to enter into partnerships with the government in Taiwan. From 2002 to 30 November 2019, more than 1,733 contracts were signed, totalling over NT$1.63 trillion in value. To accelerate national development and curb government expenditure, the Taiwanese government works in earnest to promote PPPs. Well-known projects include the build-operate-transfer (BOT) projects for the Electronic Toll Collection, the Taipei Bus Station and the City Hall Bus Station; the operate-transfer (OT) projects for the National Center for Traditional Arts, the Nangan Exhibition Center, the Kaohsiung Exhibition Center and the Kaohsiung Public Library; and the rehabilitate-operate-transfer (ROT) projects for National Center for Traditional Arts and Alishan House.
ii THE YEAR IN REVIEW
According to the Ministry of Finance (MOF), there were a total of 86 signed PPP project concession agreements as of November 2019, amounting to NT$89.2 billion in value. A landmark project was the record bid price for the superficies rights to a plot of land in Taipei's Xinyi district; the final bidding price was NT$15.98 billion, representing a premium of 60 per cent on the asking price. In addition, several well-known projects which were initiated under the auspices of other laws regulating PPP projects. For example, the Taipei Twin Towers project, for which the final bidding price reached NT$60 billion, was under the auspices of the Mass Rapid Transit Act and the Regulations on Land Development of the Mass Rapid Transit System. Also, most of the governmental urban renewal plans followed PPP models in the Urban Renewal Act. Two examples are the Kaohsiung Multi-Functional Economic and Trade Park Specific Trade Zone (III) Urban Renewal Project and the governmental Urban Renewal Project for the East Section of Ming-Chuan Road of Song-shan District.
There were several important amendments to the PPIP Act in 2015, including:
- government office buildings were added in Article 3 of the PPIP Act as a kind of infrastructure project subject to the PPIP Act;
- a feasibility assessment before promoting PPP projects was added in Article 61 of the PPIP Act;
- Paragraph 2, Article 11 of the PPIP Act was amended to the effect that the concession agreement between the authority in charge and the private entity shall specify the payment of rental for the land. Additionally, 'control and management of operation quality' was added to Paragraph 7 of the same article for elaborating on the concession agreement and the efficiency of operation. 'Adjustment and revision to or termination of the agreement' was added to Paragraph 8, Article 11. The last addition requires the dispute resolution mechanism to be prescribed in the concession agreement;
- Paragraph 2, Article 14 of the PPIP Act was added to require that where environmental impact assessment, and soil and water conservation treatment and maintenance for the land needed for a major infrastructure project are compulsory, the assessment, treatment and maintenance be reviewed jointly or concurrently by the authorities concerned in accordance with the laws and regulations governing urban planning and regional planning; and
- Paragraph 1, Article 29 of the PPIP Act introduced the key performance indicators into the subsidy mechanism for the PPP projects in which private entities cannot fully self-finance their investment.
In 2017, in response to the 2015 amendments, regulations and guidelines for PPP projects were issued or amended by the MOF, as follows:
- The Regulations on Takeover of PPP Government Office Buildings were published. These Regulations cover the procedure and rights and obligation of both parties if the government agency takes over the project in the condition described in Paragraph 1, Article 53 – any failure to take immediate action may jeopardise major public interests or result in imminent danger.
- The Evaluation Mechanism for Public Infrastructure was amended. This evaluation mechanism is meant to help government officials consider whether to initiate a PPP project. The evaluation factors include policy and financial aspects.
- The Control and Management of Operation Quality Evaluation Guidelines were renewed. The guidelines elaborate on the control and management of operation quality evaluation procedure.
- The PPP Operating Performance Subsidy Evaluation Guidelines were published, and these guidelines provide a basis for the government to evaluate the self-financing capability of the project and establish the key performance indicators for different kinds of public infrastructure.
- The Guidelines for the Authority in Charge to Execute PPP Projects were reviewed and revised according to the amended PPIP Act.
In 2016, the MOF published the Regulations for Private Institutions Applying to Participate in the Infrastructure Project under its Own Planning, which would be discussed in detail in the privately initiated project.
In 2016, the Guidelines for Mediation Committee in Performance of Concession Agreement in PPP Projects were published by the MOF. Such guidelines clarify the composition, appointment and the mission of the committee in Article 48-1 of the PPIP Act, in hope of enhancing the efficiency of mediation.
In 2019 amendments, regulations and guidelines for PPP projects were issued or amended by the MOF, including but not limited to:
- Regulations for Favourable Rentals Regarding Public Land Lease and Superficies in Infrastructure Projects (Regulations for Favorable Rentals); the calculation of rentals was revised. (See Section V);
- the amended guidelines defining 'major infrastructure projects' in Paragraph 2, Article 3 of the PPIP Act expanded the application of favourable taxation to social housing projects, to incentivise private participation in constructing social housing;
- the public infrastructure in Article 3 of the PPIP Act is detailed in Article 2 to Article 23 of the Enforcement Rules of the PPIP Act. Article 21 of the Enforcement Rules of the PPIP Act, specifying agriculture facilities, was amended. The amendment was to prevent over-commercialisation in fishing ports and minimise any adverse effects on the rights of fishermen due to the shrinking fishery space. The post-amendment Enforcement Rules limits facilities for accommodation, food and beverage, exhibition and marine recreation and educational facilities in areas zoned for leisure-related facilities;
- to promote the execution of PPP projects, the MOF published the Subsidy Evaluation Guidelines for Implementing PPP Projects. The amendments in 2019 were as follows. First, changes in urban planning are excluded from the subsidised items listed in Guideline 3. Second, post-amendment Guideline 8 differentiates between the appropriation phases of subsidies based on the progress of the subsidised items and the amount of subsidies; and
- several articles of the Regulations Governing the Organisation of the Selection Committee and the Evaluation for Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects were amended. Article 6 was amended to require that the committee members be disclosed on the websites of the competent authorities once the committee is formed. Moreover, general terms on how the committee members should avoid conflicts of interests are added in Subparagraph 4, Article 9. The main purpose behind the amendment is to improve the fairness of the Selection Committee.
iii GENERAL FRAMEWORK
i Types of public-private partnership
Pursuant to Article 8 of the PPIP Act, a private entity may participate in an infrastructure project in any of the following ways: BOT, build-transfer-operate (BTO), ROT, OT and build-operate-own (BOO):
- BOT: the private entity invests in the construction and operation of a new infrastructure, and upon expiration of the operation period, transfers the ownership of such infrastructure to the government;
- BTO: either:
- the private entity invests in the construction of the infrastructure and, upon completion of the construction, relinquishes the ownership to the government without compensation. The government then lets the private entity operate the infrastructure. Upon expiration of the operation period, the right to operate reverts to the government; or
- the private entity invests in the construction of the infrastructure. Upon completion of the construction, the government acquires the ownership by paying the construction expenses in a lump sum or in instalments. The government then lets the private entity operate the infrastructure. Upon expiration of the operation period, the right to operate reverts to the government;
- ROT: the private entity invests in the extension, reconstruction or repair of an existing infrastructure, and operates the infrastructure. Upon expiration of the operation period, the right to operate reverts to the government;
- OT: the private entity operates an infrastructure facility built with investment from the government. Upon expiration of the operation period, the right to operate reverts to the government; and
- BOO: the private entity invests in the construction of an infrastructure on private land provided by the private entity itself, has the ownership thereof upon completion of the construction, and then operates the infrastructure itself or commissions a third party to operate it.
In addition, PPP project implementation projects can also be divided into two types:
- government-initiated projects, wherein private entities are recruited by the government to implement a publicly financed project, where the government sees the private entity as having superior capacity and expertise to deal with the project than the government, and expects the private entity to be more efficient than the government; and
- privately initiated projects, wherein a private entity independently discovers a project that is deemed profitable among the public-private partnership projects and proposes its implementation to the government.
ii The authorities
According to Paragraph 1, Article 5 of the PPIP Act, the competent authority is the Public Construction Committee of the Executive Yuan, which became the Department of Promotion of Private Participation of the Ministry of Finance (the DPPP) in 2013. In practice, the DPPP is the agency in charge of the PPP scheme. Besides helping the MOF interpret the PPIP Act, the DPPP also drafts guidelines, frameworks, principles and programmes and announces them in the name of the MOF.
Besides the above, the DPPP engages in a wide range of work to promote PPPs. For example, it publishes investors' manuals, explaining approaches to the PPIP Act and related incentives or benefits to foreign investors. It also schedules training courses for officials participating in PPP. To incentivise execution and consultation, 'Golden Thumb Awards' are given every year to consultants or authorities in charge and private entities for well-executed projects.
In addition, according to Paragraph 2, Article 5 of the PPIP Act, the authority in charge refers to any authority in charge of matters relating to private participation in infrastructure projects, which may be the central authorities in charge of the industries, the municipal governments at the municipal level or the county governments at the county level. An authority in charge may authorise any of its subordinate agencies to execute matters to be handled as authorised by the Act.
iii General requirements for PPP contracts
According to Article 3 of the PPIP Act, projects for constructing any of the following facilities for public use and for promotion of public interest could be deemed an infrastructure project under the PPIP Act:
- transportation facilities and common conduits;
- environmental pollution prevention facilities;
- sewerage, water supply and water conservancy facilities;
- sanitation and medical facilities;
- social and labour welfare facilities;
- cultural and educational facilities;
- tourist attractions and lodgings;
- power facilities and public gas and fuel supply facilities;
- sports facilities;
- parks and green spaces;
- industrial, commercial and hi-tech facilities;
- development of new towns;
- agricultural facilities; and
- government office buildings.
As previously stated, there are other laws governing private participation in specific infrastructure projects; therefore, if a project does not fall within the types prescribed in Article 3 of the PPIP Act, it may still proceed under the PPP scheme. However, in such cases, the benefits under the PPIP Act, for example, favourable rentals or tax exemptions, will not apply.
Besides the limitation on types of projects qualifying under the PPIP Act, Article 11 of the PPIP Act also requires the following matters to be specified in concession agreements case by case:
- the planning, building, operation and transfer of the infrastructure;
- the payment of the rental for the land;
- the royalties, the relevant expenses, the fare rate and the adjustment;
- renewal of the agreement upon the expiration of the operation period;
- risk allocation;
- the solution in the case of poor construction or operation;
- the step-in right of the related parties;
- the auditing, construction control and management of operation quality;
- a dispute-resolution mechanism;
- the arbitration clause; and
- amendment to or termination of the agreement, and any other agreed matters.
iv BIDDING AND AWARD PROCEDURE
Private entities interested in making an application can submit required documents for the government to select the best qualified applicant. Following selection, both parties enter into negotiation and sign an agreement. If, after the selection, the best applicant fails to execute the agreement in accordance with the schedule, then the government may make another public notice to negotiate and sign an agreement with the second-best applicant.
i Expressions of interest
As previously stated, PPP project implementation can also be divided into two types: government-initiated projects and privately initiated projects.
To the government-initiated projects, the authority in charge has to first evaluate whether the PPP scheme is suitable for the project. According to the Evaluation Mechanism for Public Infrastructure proposed by the MOF, the evaluation for feasibility covers the current public infrastructure operation, public policy, the type of PPP, finances and land ownership. After such an evaluation, evaluation of feasibility and preliminary plan should be done. According to the Guidelines for Governmental Agencies in Promotion of Private Participation, feasibility in market, engineering technology, finances, law and land securing should be evaluated carefully. Moreover, environmental impact assessment (EIA) has been a significant concern in evaluating feasibility in recent years.
Based on the evaluation of feasibility, the government should commence the preliminary plan for the project. The preliminary plan should include:
- the goal of the project;
- the term and scope of the approval;
- the plan for construction and operation;
- the timetable for EIA;
- finances and risk management;
- approved investment; and
- the plan for implementing the agreement.
The guidelines specifically point out that the plan for construction and operation has to cover EIA and carbon emission reduction initiatives. To the privately initiated projects, a private entity needs to submit:
- a land utilisation plan;
- a building plan;
- an operational plan;
- a financial plan;
- a letter of intent to finance issued by a financial institution; and
- other documents required by applicable laws (the requested documents) to the authority in charge for approval.
If the authority in charge finds the application meets the policy requirements, the application shall be reviewed according to the following procedure:
- where the private entity applicant provides private land needed by the project, the application shall be reviewed by the authority in charge; and
- where the authority in charge provides land and facilities needed by the project, the private entity applicant shall submit a project outline in advance.
After the project outline passes the preliminary review of the authority in charge, the application guide will be made and announced by the authority in charge. Then the original applicant and other applicants may submit the requested documents accordingly. To evaluate the applications, the authority in charge shall organise a selection committee to establish the evaluation criteria based on the purpose of the infrastructure project concerned, examine and evaluate the materials submitted by the applicants on a fair basis, and then select the best applicant within the evaluation period.
ii Requests for proposals and unsolicited proposals
After the evaluation of feasibility and the preliminary plan in the government-initiated projects, the government would make a public notice to invite bids from interested entities to the privately initiated projects, where the authority in charge provides land and facilities needed by the project.
The public notice should specify:
- the character, basic requirements, concession period and scope of the infrastructure project;
- the qualification requirements for the applicant;
- the items and standards of application review;
- the items awaiting negotiation;
- the date of announcement, the deadline for application, the application procedure and earnest money;
- the scope for the ancillary enterprises allowed for private investment and the concession period for the land needed; and
- the matters authorised or commissioned by the authority in charge in accordance with Paragraphs 2 and 3, Article 5 of the Act.
Besides the information given in the public notice, the tender documents shall state the following items:
- information in the public notice;
- the main content and format of the investment proposal;
- the method and schedule of the application review;
- the commitment and cooperation matters of the government;
- the items and procedures of negotiation, only when negotiations are allowed;
- the deadline for contract negotiation and execution; and
- the draft of concession agreement.
If a private entity is interested in a project, then it may submit a bid by following the instructions on the public notice and the tender document.
iii Evaluation and grant
According to the Regulations Governing the Organisation of the Selection Committee and the Evaluation for Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects, the authority in charge has to organise a selection committee for private participation in infrastructure projects (the Selection Committee) for each project. The Selection Committee has to be established before a public notice inviting private participation is posted, and should be dissolved upon completion of the review process and when there are no outstanding issues.
The duties of the Selection Committee include prescribing or approving evaluation criteria and ways of selection, conducting comprehensive evaluation of the applications, helping the authority in charge to interpret matters related to the evaluation items, evaluation criteria and the selection outcome. When prescribing or approving the evaluation items and evaluation criteria, the Selection Committee has to first consider the purpose of the infrastructure project and public interest. Evaluation criteria should include the financial plan and appropriate allocation standards; innovation and creativity may be included in the evaluation criteria or sub-criteria, subject to the type of the project. The financial plan has to cover the royalties or governmental premiums, subject to the type of the project.
As required by this regulation, the Selection Committee should consist of seven to 17 members appointed or retained by the authority in charge and have expertise or experience in fields related to the infrastructure project. To ensure fairness, at least half of the Selection Committee members have to be external experts or scholars.
v THE CONTRACT
The payments typically made by the private entity in a PPP Project include the land rental and the royalties. Unlike royalties, which can be waived when the private entity's finances decline during a project, land rental is compulsory. According to the Regulations for Favorable Rentals, rental calculation for public land in infrastructure projects is divided into building period and operation period. In the building period, the rental is equal to land value tax plus the necessary maintenance fee. In the operation period, rental is 60 per cent of the amount calculated by the rental standard of State-Owned Land Lot. However, the amount of the rental may not exceed 106 per cent of the previous rental. Rental is an issue because the announced land value was once considerably lower than the market price, and today the announced land value is getting closer to the market price. During the bidding process, the rental is calculated using the announced land value. Therefore, if during the operation period, the market price of the land and the announced land value around the projects soar, then the private entity may face unforeseen financial risks. In response to this problem, in December 2019, the Regulations for Favorable Rentals was amended. Under the pre-amendment Regulations for Favorable Rentals, during the building period and the operation period of PPP projects, the land rentals and declared land prices were closely correlated. Meanwhile, declared land prices had skyrocketed in recent years, and rentals in PPP projects calculated by the Regulations for Favorable Rentals would drive up the land rental cost, which would undermine the projects and lead to disputes. The post-amendment rentals for public lands in PPP infrastructure projects will be calculated as follows: during the building period, the rental shall be the declared land price multiplied by the land tax rate, and during the operation period, the rental shall be the declared land price multiplied by the land tax rate, plus 2 percent of the declared land price when the agreement is signed. This amendment is expected to greatly dampen the effect of the shifting declared land prices on the land rentals and curb land rental fluctuations. Furthermore, the intent of the amendment states:
Considering the variety in scale, terms, financial planning of different projects, and the public bidding process, the PPP projects signed before the amendment of this article shall follow the principle of 'resorting to the provisions before amendment for substantial issues.' Therefore, the rentals for those projects shall be based on the regulations at the time the agreement was signed.
Consequently, the post-amendment Regulations for Favorable Rentals does not apply to private institutions in projects with agreements that have been signed.
ii State guarantees
In Taiwan, only a few kinds of agreements involve state guarantees, for example, the guaranteed amount of sewage for operation and disposal fees calculation for sewer PPP projects, and there are fewer agreements having such guarantees in recent years.
iii Distribution of risk
In concession agreements and civil law, the doctrine of change of circumstances and clauses in force majeure events are the principal means of distribution of risk.
The common terms regarding force majeure and changes in circumstances are:
- force majeure, which includes:
- wars (whether declared or not), invasions, actions of foreign enemies, rebellions, revolutions, insurrections, civil wars or terrorist activities;
- radiation or radioactive contamination from explosion of nuclear fuels or burning of wastes;
- natural disasters, including but not limited to earthquakes, floods, tsunami, lightning, or any occurrences due to forces of nature;
- strikes, labour riots or other labour disputes not attributable to Party B or its contractors, which will affect the performance of this Agreement;
- discovery of monuments or sites protected by laws and regulations, which will affect the construction procedure or the expected commencement of the operations; and
- environmental pollution occurred in the construction sites which will affect construction workers; and
- changes in circumstances, which are not attributable to either party and refers to:
- events other than force majeure events, changes in government policies, revisions of laws, administrative orders, sanctions, actions or no action that has significant adverse effects on Party B's construction or operations hereunder or its financial condition and is likely to impact the performance of this Agreement;
- major changes in the overall economy causing significant adverse impact on Party B's construction or operations hereunder or its financial condition, and likely to impact the performance of this Agreement or render the project not self-liquidity;
- Party B's delay in obtaining construction-related licences and permits for over a certain number of days for causes not attributable to Party B; and
- other non-force majeure events.
Once an event is identified as either a force majeure event or a change in circumstances, the parties can take one or more of the remedial measures set forth below according to the terms of the concession agreement:
- the damage resulting from force majeure events or change in circumstances shall first be indemnified by the insurance policies procured by the private entity or any of its contractors, suppliers, professional advisers or trustees;
- a reduction of the rents or other taxes in accordance with the applicable laws;
- if the private entity sustains material damage as a result of natural disasters, the authority in charge shall negotiate with financial institutions for extending serious natural disaster damage recovery loans or other reliefs to the private entity;
- to suspend the construction and operation periods in the concession agreement, and extend such periods as appropriate;
- to adjust the deadline for royalty payments and the royalty amounts;
- adjusting the fee schedule of the public utilities or the operations of Party B approved by Party A; and
- other measures agreed on by the parties.
Adjustment and revision
Adjustment and revision clauses are usually in the concession agreement. Common grounds for agreement revision include:
- occurrence of any force majeure events, exceptions, or changes in circumstances causing the continued performance of this Agreement to be unfair or difficult;
- out of consideration for public interests, continued performance of this Agreement or continued handling according to this Agreement that may have adverse effects on public interests;
- substantial reduction of Party B's construction and operation costs or tax burden results from causes other than Party B's performance of this Agreement;
- if revised, the schedules or appendices have no adverse effects on public interests and are not unfair; and
- a revision that is necessary for performance of this Agreement, is agreed on by the parties, has no adverse effects on public interests, and is not unfair.
In addition, as most concession agreements are long-term contracts, the MOF also encourages adding a term for regular review into the contract, such as a certain number of years after the signing of this Agreement or the last revision of this Agreement, the parties may review whether it is necessary to revise this Agreement. Issues to be reviewed include but are not limited to whether events not attributable to Party A have a great impact on Party B's performance of this Agreement. The events in question are as follows:
- the annual change in the price index announced by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics of the Executive Yuan rises by a certain per cent or falls by a certain per cent for certain consecutive years;
- the national economic growth rate announced by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics of the Executive Yuan rises by a certain per cent or falls by a certain per cent for certain consecutive quarters;
- Party B's accumulated construction and operation costs in a certain number of years increase by over a certain per cent as compared with the estimated costs set forth in the original financial schedule; and
- other factors, such as fluctuations of price indexes in other fields, or new technologies, new materials or new engineering technologies for medical tests or smart transportation systems, where product technology changes fast.
Ownership of underlying assets
To prevent interruptions in or abandonment of PPP projects, the PPIP Act imposes the following limitation on transferring the underlying assets in most cases. Pursuant to Article 51 of the PPIP Act, a private entity shall not transfer, lease out or create any encumbrance on the concession obtained under the concession agreement, nor shall it make such concession an object for enforcement in a civil action, unless the authority in charge declares that such an act is necessary for the improvement plan or the proper measures specified in the cases prescribed in the PPIP Act. This situation may happen in BOT or BOO cases, when the private entity owns the underlying assets. In short, unless the government's consent is obtained, the underlying assets may not be transferred, leased or set as security.
The common grounds for early termination include:
- mutually agreed termination, which means that during the term of the agreement, the parties may mutually agree to terminate the agreement;
- termination for causes attributable to the private entity; and
- termination for causes not attributable to the private entity, such as force majeure events or changes in circumstances, termination for a reason attributable to the authority in charge, or termination due to changes of government policies
For each termination cause, the effects on the termination will be stipulated in the concession agreement.
Before Paragraph 1, Article 29 of the PPIP Act was amended in 2015, if a project could not be fully self-financed, the authority in charge can subsidise the loan interest or invest in the project. However, shadow tolls under the private finance initiative module in the United Kingdom were consulted in the drafting of the 2015 amendment, and the above subsidy was replaced by the following alternative: if a private entity cannot fully self-finance its investment in an infrastructure project, even if other incentives under the PPIP Act are applicable, the authority in charge may, for the amount of the shortfall, subsidise the part of the interest on the loan needed by the private entity or grant a subsidy, depending on whether the private entity reaches the key performance indicators stipulated in the concession agreement. This system provides motivation for enhancing operational performance. The reason for the amendment provides that it is in the public interest for government agencies to be supportive, yet if subsidies were given improperly, they would lead to rampant speculation and cause inefficiency of the projects. Therefore, the private entities can be better motivated if the subsidies are contingent upon their operational performance.
vii RECENT DECISIONS
The dispute resolution mechanisms include mediation, arbitration and litigation. But since Article 48-1 of the PPIP Act indicates that the concession agreement of every PPP project shall prescribe the formation of a mediation committee for contract dispute resolution and may require that disputes be submitted to arbitration if mediation fails, more and more disputes that arise from PPP projects can be resolved by mediation before the parties bring the dispute to arbitration or litigation.
In addition, disputes in PPP projects usually revolve around financial conditions, and if one party is not satisfied by the financial conditions, it will propose adjustments. In the past, it was usually the private entities that initiated such adjustment; however, in recent years, the government has initiated such adjustments to adjust the royalties.
In recent years, compared with local projects, major national projects have been rare. To boost the number of PPP projects, the government has developed more sophisticated standard operating procedures in different kinds of projects, and the types of projects open for PPPs are broader and more contemporary. Both central and local governments fully support and promote PPP projects, and foreign investment is especially welcome. We believe that in the coming year, the Taiwanese government will establish an even more conducive environment for the PPP scheme.
1 Pauline Wang is a partner and Yung-Ching Huang is a senior associate at Lee and Li.