In Spain, there is no legislation specific to virtual currencies; nor is any draft legislation in the pipeline. There is only one piece of draft legislation, published by the government in July 2018, which indirectly relates to virtual currencies. This draft legislation includes measures for the digital transformation of the financial system, including the legal framework for a regulatory sandbox.2

That said, in 2018 the Spanish securities regulator (CNMV) and the Bank of Spain have so far issued joint advice on the risks associated with purchasing virtual currencies or investing in products tied to them,3 and the CNMV has issued two other documents setting out its opinion and position on several matters related to virtual currencies.

The Spanish tax authorities have also issued several binding rulings on the tax aspects of activities involving virtual currencies.


i Classification and commercialisation of virtual currencies

The CNMV has unofficially stated that virtual currencies per se should not be considered as securities. However, it has acknowledged that the offering and commercialisation of virtual currencies can have investment law implications as follows.4

Direct marketing

Both where virtual currencies are acquired through platforms operating on the internet (exchanges) and through cryptocurrency automatic teller machines (ATMs), the CNMV considers that investors do not actually directly own the virtual currencies, and instead only have rights in relation to an unsupervised exchange or intermediary. As a consequence, purchasers are exposed to the risk of an intermediary becoming insolvent or not complying with basic rules on proper record-keeping, diligent custody and recording of assets, and the correct management of conflicts of interest.

Contracts for differences

Entities offering these products should be authorised by the CNMV to provide investment services and meet all reporting obligations and other applicable rules of conduct.

Futures, options and other derivatives

If these types of products have been authorised by a regulated supervisor, their active marketing under a public offering by market professionals to retail investors might require a prospectus approved by the CNMV or another EU authority under the passporting arrangements.

Specific investment funds and other collective investment vehicles that invest in virtual currencies

These types of vehicles and investment funds should be approved or registered by the CNMV.The CNMV5 has acknowledged that, in accordance with Article 2.1 of Law 22/2014, a closed-ended collective investment scheme can invest directly in virtual currencies, but it has to be registered with the CNMV. In this regard, the CNMV has pointed out that the divestment policies of its participants or partners must meet the following requirements: divestment must take place simultaneously with respect to all investors and participants; and investors and participants must be remunerated according to the articles of association or regulations for each class of shares or participations.

It should be noted that this type of fund cannot be marketed to retail investors.

Acquiring structured bonds where the underlying asset is a virtual currency

The marketing under a public offering regime of exchange-traded products and exchange-traded notes requires the approval of the supervisors of an explanatory prospectus that has also been subject to the relevant EU passporting procedure.

ii Initial coin offerings

The CNMV6 understands that transactions structured as initial coin offerings (ICOs) in many cases should be treated as issues or public offerings of transferable securities given the broad definition of transferable security under Spanish law.7

The CNMV sets out the following factors as being relevant in assessing whether transferable securities are being offered through an ICO:

  1. tokens that assign rights or expectations of a share in the potential increase in value or profitability of businesses or projects or, in general, that they constitute or assign rights equivalent or similar to those of shares, bonds or other financial instruments governed by Spanish securities law; or
  2. tokens that entitle access to services or to receive goods or products, that they are offered referring explicitly or implicitly to the expectation that the purchaser or investor will obtain a profit as a result of their increase in value or some form of remuneration associated with the instrument, or reference is made to its liquidity or tradability on equivalent or allegedly similar markets to regulated securities markets.

However, in case (b) above, if it cannot be reasonably established that there is a correlation between the expectations of a profit or an increase of value and the evolution of the underlying business or project, then the token should not be considered as a financial instrument.

If ICOs qualify as financial instruments, then the regulation contained in, relating to or arising from MiFID II, the Prospectus Directive and the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive should apply to them.

Even if an ICO does not qualify as a public offer (because it is either aimed at fewer than 150 investors, or involves a minimum investment of €100,000 or a total amount of less than €5 million), if the placement is made using whatsoever form of advertising (including websites in Spanish offering the tokens), an entity authorised to provide investment services should intervene in relation to its marketing.8 The CNMV understands that this requirement is fulfilled if the entity authorised to provide investment services intervenes:

  1. on the occasion of each individual subscription or acquisition of the securities or financial instruments as a placement agent, broker or adviser, subject to the rules applicable in each case; or
  2. by validating and supervising the offer in general and, in particular, the information provided to investors, and the placement or marketing procedure used (without an authorised entity having to intervene on the occasion of each subscription or acquisition). With regard to the validation of information, the authorised entity must ensure that the information is clear, impartial and not misleading, and that it refers to the characteristics and risks of the securities issued, as well as the company's legal, economic and financial situation, in a sufficiently detailed manner to allow the investor to make a well-informed investment decision. Likewise, the information for investors shall include a warning on the novel nature of the registry technology and on the fact that the custody of the tokens is not carried out by an authorised entity.

To date, the CNMV has not authorised any ICOs, although it has analysed several potential ICO structures, and it seems that an ICO authorised by the CNMV is likely to occur in the near future.


The Bank of Spain, the Spanish authority responsible for banking and money transfer matters, has not issued any statement or otherwise set out its position on virtual currencies other than in the aforementioned joint warning issued with the CNMV.

According to the joint warning, and although they acknowledge that virtual currencies are occasionally presented as an alternative to legal tender, the Spanish authorities note that the former differ greatly from the latter in that their acceptance as a means of payment of a debt or other obligations is not mandatory; their circulation is very limited; and their value fluctuates widely, meaning that they cannot be considered as a sound store of value or a stable unit of account.

At present, no virtual currency, including Bitcoin, is recognised by Spanish law as a digital currency, electronic money or as a payment method.


Without prejudice to the warnings issued by the Bank of Spain and the CNMV on money laundering risks regarding virtual currencies themselves and the activities related to them, there is no specific Spanish money laundering regulation (in force or in draft form) applicable to virtual currencies, and Sepblac, the Spanish money laundering authority, has not expressed its view on this matter.


The regulation to which an exchange is subject under Spanish law depends on whether or not the assets are traded as financial instruments and on the type of activity performed within the exchange.

Although there is no specific regulation on trading platforms for virtual currencies or other crypto assets, the CNMV9 has indicated that to the extent that the assets traded in an exchange are not considered as financial instruments, at a very minimum they should be subject to rules related to custody, registration, management of conflicts of interest between clients and transparency on fees (in addition to anti-money laundering regulations). Therefore, the CNMV recommends that these platforms voluntarily apply the principles of securities market regulations relating to the aforementioned matters in order to ensure the proper functioning of their activities. If they qualify as financial instruments, Spanish securities market legislation applies; therefore, the corresponding authorisations must be obtained, including, where appropriate, an authorisation as a trading venue (such as a regulated market, a multilateral trading system or an organised trading facility), or as an investment firm or credit institution that operates as a systematic internaliser.

On the other hand, the Bank of Spain does not give any guidance as to whether activities performed by an exchange would qualify as payment services or currency exchange services for regulatory purposes where virtual currencies are used solely for payment purposes (not as securities or similar).

However, to the extent that regulated markets, multilateral trading facilities (MTFs) and organised trading facilities (OTFs) located in Spain require that the instruments traded in them will be represented in book entries and tokens cannot be represented in book entries, then they could not be traded in Spanish regulated markets, MTFs or OTFs.


Except for the tax issues explained below, there is no regulation of miners in Spain, and the Bank of Spain and the CNMV have not expressed their views on this matter.

Having said that, to the extent that miners would not be considered as issuers of financial instruments or electronic money, or as placing financial instruments, no licence or authorisation would be required under Spanish law to mine.


To the extent that virtual currencies could be classed as financial instruments or as electronic money, their issuers must obtain the corresponding authorisations from the CNMV and the Bank of Spain. In terms of virtual currencies as financial instruments, see Section II.ii regarding ICOs. Neither the Bank of Spain nor the current legislation considers a virtual currency as electronic money; therefore, its issuance falls outside the scope of the Spanish legislation on electronic money institutions.

The concept of sponsor does not exist under Spanish law.


As with any other asset, there are certain criminal risks when dealing with virtual currencies given that the conduct of a third party (e.g., a director) may cause a loss in the investor's equity.

First, it must be kept in mind that equity as a whole is the legal interest protected from the crime of fraud and that cryptocurrencies are a part of such equity because they are considered valuable assets. As a consequence, improper acts of disposition of cryptocurrency assets are protected by criminal law. For this behaviour described to be considered punishable, the requirements set forth in Article 248 of the Criminal Code must be met. This Article contains the ways in which the crime of fraud can be considered to have been committed.

The first of those ways, foreseen in Article 248.1, is committed when the perpetrator, for financial gain and by means of deception, induces an essential error in the victim that produces an act of disposition of assets to his or her own detriment or to the detriment of a third party. In addition, there must be a link between the deception of the perpetrator and the act of disposition of the victim (for all these elements, see High Court judgment 531/2015 of 23 September).

Article 248.1 also provides for another type of fraud in cases in which perpetrators use a computer manipulation or similar device to obtain a non-consensual transfer of an asset to the detriment of the victim or a third party (High Court judgment 860/2008 of 17 December). This is computer fraud, a type of fraud set out in Article 248.2.a) of the Criminal Code. This Article sets out the same scheme as described above but without the need for deception – understood in a strict sense – as it is replaced by computer manipulation. That is to say, where traditional fraud requires deception, computer fraud requires a computer manipulation or similar device. This implies that this crime can be committed through a multitude of behaviours given the breadth of the expression computer manipulation or similar device. Thus, for example, the offence would be committed when an individual alters an email address or bank account number or introduces files that unlock a user's passwords.

Judgment 185/2018 of March 7 of Section 3 of the Provincial Court of Madrid assessed a recent case of fraud as defined under Article 248.1 of the Criminal Code. In this case, the Court condemned the director of a company after he signed several high frequency trading agreements under which he committed to manage Bitcoins that were delivered to him in deposit, then reinvest the potential dividends and at maturity deliver the profits obtained in exchange for a commission. However, it was proven that at the time of signing the aforementioned agreements, the convicted person did not intend to fulfil his obligations since he did not perform any transactions, and his only intention was to seize the received Bitcoins and simulate the execution of such agreements.

The criminal procedure under which these crimes are prosecuted in Spain does not contain any special provision for when the disposition of assets relates to a type of cryptocurrency instead of a traditional currency. Therefore, the procedure for summary proceedings will apply if the penalty does not exceed nine years in prison.

This procedure is divided into three phases. The first phase is the pretrial phase, in which the judge will try to obtain evidence to determine whether the investigated behaviour may be considered criminal and, if so, discover the identity of the perpetrator. The second is the intermediate phase, in which the prosecution and defence will draft their respective reports. The third phase is the oral trial, in which the admitted evidence is assessed.

The main procedural difficulties faced by the Spanish authorities when it comes to prosecuting these crimes are the lack of jurisdiction and competence. Thus, the anonymity with which the perpetrators act, the places from which they do so (in most cases they are outside Spain) and the fact that the funds usually go to other countries prevent the Spanish justice system from taking action against them.

ix TAX

Virtual currencies perform an economic function (store of value or medium of exchange), which means that their possession and use may have tax implications. What is more, they pose a higher-than-average risk of being used as a means to commit tax fraud given that it is very difficult to determine the true identity of their owners (to the point that they are almost anonymous), and that the transactions are peer-to-peer and may have a cross-border element, and therefore the ability of tax authorities to monitor them is reduced. All this has put them under the spotlight of the Spanish tax authorities, albeit the tax regime and reporting obligations regarding virtual currencies are still at an early stage.

Below we analyse the tax treatment of mining and the exchange of virtual currencies for income and value added tax purposes (dynamic approach), as well as the net wealth tax regime and other reporting obligations (static approach).

i Income tax and value added tax (dynamic approach)

The tax treatment of virtual currencies and their trading differs within the country, depending on the tax. From an accounting standpoint, the Spanish Accounting Board considers virtual currencies to be an intangible asset or a commercial stock, depending on their use.

To date, the Spanish tax authorities have considered that any operation (except mining) with virtual currencies constitutes a barter transaction for income tax purposes (personal income tax, corporate income tax and non-resident income tax), which means that users of virtual currencies make a capital gain or loss with any delivery of virtual currencies; and tax compliance becomes complicated and burdensome for both the taxpayer and the tax authority.

The Spanish tax authorities set out in binding tax ruling V0808-18 of 22 March that the use of virtual currencies outside of the performance of an economic activity may result in capital gains or losses at the moment in which the transaction takes place (Article 14.1.c of the PIT Law10), with a tax rate of up to 23 per cent for individuals. The income obtained from mining is considered business income, and the applicable tax rate could be as much as 48 per cent for individuals, depending on the autonomous region where they reside. The corporate income tax rate is 25 per cent, while the non-resident income tax rate is 24 per cent (19 per cent for EU and EEA residents). The Spanish tax authorities also state in binding tax ruling V1149-18 of 8 May that the exit tax regulated in Article 95 bis of the PIT Law does not apply to virtual currencies.

As regards value added tax, the Spanish tax authorities' position, as set out in binding tax ruling V1748-18 of 18 June, is aligned with that of the European Court of Justice, which considered in Hedqvist11 that virtual currencies constitute a currency in the sense of Article 135(1)(e) of the VAT Directive and are a direct means of payment; therefore, services related to those currencies (including mining) are covered by the VAT exemption granted by the above-mentioned Article. Consequently, input VAT will not be deductible.

ii Net wealth tax and reporting obligations (static approach)

Virtual currencies, as an asset, fall under the scope of the NWT Law,12 and therefore must be declared by filing form 714 with the Spanish tax authorities by 30 June each year. According to Article 24 of the NWT Law, taxpayers must report their virtual currencies' market value in euros on 31 December. There is no official market value, so taxpayers will have to rely on the most widely used websites (such as www.coindesk.com). The Spanish tax authorities endorsed this conclusion in their binding ruling V0590-18 of 1 March. The net wealth tax rate can be up to 2.75 per cent, depending on the autonomous region of residence (there are some regions with a zero per cent rate).

In addition to the net wealth tax, there are three independent obligations to declare all assets held abroad worth more than €50,000 (bank accounts, securities and real estate). Taxpayers must submit form 720 (informative report of assets and rights held abroad) by 31 March each year. To date, virtual currencies have not been considered to be securities or held in a bank account for tax purposes; therefore, it seems they need not be included in a form 720 declaration. However, this approach will probably change in the near future. In this regard, the government made public on 19 October 2018 a draft bill on measures to prevent and fight tax evasion, including a new obligation to report the amount of virtual currencies held in Spain or abroad (through Form 720), identifying the owner and the beneficial owner; and report all transactions involving virtual currencies (acquisitions, sales, barter transactions or transfers). The legislative proposal has not been published yet.13

There are no specific reporting obligations for virtual currencies. The Annual Tax and Customs Control Plan for 2018, published in the Spanish Official Gazette of 23 January 2018, pointed out that, in the context of the prevention and suppression of smuggling, drug trafficking and money laundering, the tax authorities 'will detect and prevent the use by organised crime of the deep web to trade in any illicit goods, as well as the use of cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin or similar as a means of payment'. Even though there is no mention of a concrete legislative action, it seems that the National Antifraud Office is attempting to identify all entities that operate with virtual currencies, and is sending them requests to provide specific information. The Spanish tax authorities are also assessing the possibility of imposing new reporting obligations, regulating human ATMs (persons carrying out physical transfers of virtual currencies using apps such as www.meetup.com) and establishing a sanctioning regime for non-compliance with these reporting obligations.


While no specific legislation has been adopted in Spain on virtual currencies, the need for comprehensive regulation (of, inter alia, tax, consumer protection and regulatory aspects) regarding this matter has been already discussed in both Spanish legislative chambers by all political parties.

On the other hand, the Spanish supervisory bodies (the CNMV, the Bank of Spain and Sepblac) understand that, given the transnational nature of virtual currencies and the activities related to them (issuance, deposit, marketing, etc.), their regulation should be addressed at an international level or, at the very least, at an EU level, so that as many regulators and supervisory bodies as possible adopt and share common positions. The first step in this direction is Directive 2018/843 of 30 May 2018 amending Directive (EU) 2015/849 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, which directly regulates virtual currencies for the first time at an EU level.

Despite the potential risks that virtual currencies pose as a consequence of their lack of regulation, both the Spanish legislator and supervisory bodies are aware of their importance and of the technological developments behind them, and they are therefore pressing for the speedy adoption of regulations and common positions on this matter at an EU level.


1 Pilar Lluesma Rodrigo is counsel and Alberto Gil Soriano is a senior associate at Uría Menéndez.

4 See CNMV considerations on cryptocurrencies and ICOs addressed to market professionals, 8 February 2018.

5 See Questions and Answers for FinTech companies on activities and services that may be within the CNMV's remit, last update 6 July 2018.

6 See CNMV considerations on cryptocurrencies and ICOs addressed to market professionals, 8 February 2018.

7 Article 2.1. of the Spanish Securities Law: 'Any patrimonial right, regardless of its name, which, because of its legal configuration and system of transfer, can be traded in a generalised and impersonal way on a financial market.'

8 Article 35.3 of the Spanish Securities Law.

9 See Questions and Answers for FinTech companies on activities and services that may be within CNMV's remit, last update 6 July 2018.

10 Law 35/2006 of 28 November on the personal income tax.

11 Judgment of 22 October 2015, Hedqvist, case C-264/14.

12 Law 19/1991 of 6 June on the net wealth tax.