The Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption Review: Spain


In Spain, bribery is regulated in the Spanish Criminal Code (SCC). The SCC prohibits the payment and receipt (including the promise or offer) of bribes, both to public officials or authorities and to private entities or individuals in commercial transactions. The SCC also regulates other offences related to corruption (including influence peddling, embezzlement and illegal political financing). These cases are investigated by specialist law enforcement bodies created for this purpose.

In the past few years, Spain has seen some of the biggest corruption cases in its recent history. These have involved several politicians and businessmen and have shaken its political system. This has led to unprecedented decisions by the Spanish courts, including the conviction of a political party for profiting from corruption, as well as a vote of no confidence in the former Prime Minister.

Domestic bribery: legal framework

i Criminal offence of bribery

Under the SCC, bribery occurs whenever a public official receives or is offered a reward to carry out an act or make an omission in breach of his or her duties or in the performance of these duties.

The offence can take the form of 'passive bribery', when the public official receives or requests the bribe, or 'active bribery', when an individual offers or gives a bribe to a public official. In Spain, active bribery and passive bribery are regulated as separate offences.

According to the SCC, passive bribery takes place when a public official, for personal benefit or that of a third party, performs one of the following actions:

  1. requests or receives a gift, payment or favour or accepts an offer or promise thereof, in exchange for carrying out an act in the exercise of their duties and position that constitutes a criminal offence, or for abstaining from performing their duties;2
  2. subsequently requests or receives a gift, payment or favour, or accepts an offer or promise thereof, in exchange for carrying out an act which is inherent to his or her position;3
  3. requests or receives a reward for having carried out the acts described above;4 or
  4. accepts a gift offered due to his or her position or powers.5

On the other hand, active bribery takes place when an individual, for personal benefit or that of a third party, corrupts or attempts to corrupt, by themselves or through an intermediary, a public official with gifts, offers, promises, gratuities, meals or entertainment.6

Merely offering or promising a benefit, advantage or gift to a public official, or the public official requesting or accepting it, is sufficient to constitute a criminal offence of bribery, even if the reward is not effectively received or the public official does not carry out the action for which said reward was given.7

Payments made to public officials with a view to obtaining a licit benefit (also known as 'facilitating payments') are illegal in Spain. However, there are no quantitative or qualitative restrictions on gifts, travel, meals or entertainment. In this regard, there are two main criteria established by Spanish case law8 to determine if a gift or gratuity can be considered as an act of bribery:

  1. if the gift or gratuity offered or received is not 'socially acceptable'; and
  2. if the gift offered or received could affect the decision of the recipient.

In conclusion, whether a gift or gratuity can be considered as part of a bribery offence or not has to be assessed on a case-by-case basis following the previous criteria.

ii Other related offences

The SCC regulates other offences related to bribery and corruption.

Influence peddling

According to the SCC,9 this offence takes place when an individual or a public official influences another public official, by exercising the powers deriving from their position or their personal or hierarchical relationship with said public official or any other public official, in order to obtain a decision that results in a personal or a third-party benefit.


Under the SCC,10 embezzlement is committed when a public official abuses their powers to administer public assets by exceeding the limits of these powers or retaining said public assets for themselves or for a third party.

Fraud and unlawful exactions

According to the SCC,11 these offences can take place when a public official participating in a public procurement process defrauds a public entity, demands undue fees or abuses their position to commit fraud or misappropriate social security benefits.

Negotiations and activities which public officials are prohibited from carrying out, and abuse in the exercise of their public duties

Under this title, the SCC12 regulates offences such as taking advantage of holding the position of public official to participate in a transaction or business, or the use of inside information to obtain a financial benefit.

iii Definition of public official

The SCC13 provides for a broad concept of public official, which includes those individuals who, by provision of the law, or by election or appointment by an authority, participate in the exercising of public duties, including for any public body or state-owned or state-controlled company.

With regard to the offence of bribery, the term 'public official' is also applicable to juries, arbitrators, mediators, experts, administrators or receivers appointed by a court, bankruptcy administrators and any other individuals carrying out a public duty.14

iv Private corruption

The SCC15 also prohibits bribery between private entities or individuals in commercial transactions. Corruption in business occurs when an offer, promise, concession or acceptance is made with the object of obtaining unjustified benefits or advantages, of any nature, as compensation for the undue promotion over a third party in the acquisition or sale of goods, the contracting of services or in commercial transactions. The receipt, request or acceptance of a benefit or advantage and the promise, offer or granting thereof constitute separate offences under the SCC.

v Political contributions

The restrictions and limits on making donations to political parties are established in Law 8/2007, of 4 July 2007, on the Financing of Political Parties.

Political parties cannot accept any form of funding from foreign governments and foreign public companies or entities, but they may receive them from foreign individuals within the limits and in accordance with the requirements and conditions established in Law 8/2007.

Under the SCC,16 receiving or making donations or contributions intended for a political party, federation, coalition or group of voters in breach of Law 8/2007 is considered a criminal offence.

vi Corporate criminal liability

Both individuals and companies can be held criminally liable for bribery of public officials, as well as other corruption related offences, such as influence peddling, corruption in commercial transactions and, since 2019, embezzlement.

Companies are criminally liable for the offences committed in their name or on their behalf and to their benefit by their legal representatives, directors and officers or by those under their authority who have performed such acts in the absence of due control over them.17

vii Penalties

Under the SCC,18 the penalties for individuals and public officials who commit bribery are imprisonment for a term ranging from six months to six years (depending on the particular offence), a fine of 12 to 24 months,19 and special barring from employment or public office for a period of five to 12 years or suspension for one to three years.

The penalty for companies who commit bribery is a fine which can range from six months to five years,20 or two to five times the profit obtained if the resulting amount is higher, depending on the penalties foreseen for the criminal offence committed by the individual.21

Additionally, individuals and companies who commit bribery related to procurement proceedings, subsidies or auctions called by the Public Administration or public entities, can also be barred from obtaining public subsidies, entering into contracts with the government and public entities and obtaining tax and Social Security benefits for a period of five to 10 years.22

Moreover, if a company is found guilty of bribery, the following penalties can also be imposed:

  1. dissolution of the legal entity;
  2. suspension of its activities for a period of up to five years;
  3. closure of its premises and establishments for a period of up to five years;
  4. prohibition from carrying out the activities through which it committed, facilitated or concealed the criminal offence. This prohibition may be temporary (up to 15 years) or permanent;
  5. being barred from obtaining public subsidies, entering into contracts with the public sector and enjoying tax or Social Security benefits for a period of up to 15 years; and
  6. judicial intervention to safeguard the rights of the workers or creditors for the necessary period of time and up to five years.23

Under Spanish Law,24 public contracts obtained through corruption (e.g., by means of bribery) are null and void. Consequently, if a criminal ruling declares that a public contract was obtained through corrupt practices, the public administration can initiate proceedings to render said contract null and void and thereby terminate it.

Another consequence of committing a criminal offence related to corruption is the confiscation of the assets and gains obtained from the perpetration of the offence and of the goods, means or instruments with which it was executed.25 The confiscation can also be extended to assets or gains which have been transferred to a third party acting in bad faith. Exceptionally, Criminal Courts can order the confiscation of goods, personal effects and gains obtained illegally, even if no sentence has been handed down, in certain cases (e.g., when the defendant is in a situation which prevents a trial taking place or when the defendant cannot be sentenced because they are exempted from criminal liability or their liability has expired).

Moreover, under the SCC,26 individuals who, in good faith, profit from the effects of a criminal offence by obtaining a financial gain are obliged to return the item or to provide compensation for the loss and damage incurred up to the amount of their involvement in such offence.

Finally, it is important to note that, in the event that a bribe results in the delivery of an arbitrary or unjust decision or where a public official fails to render a decision, which was due under their duties, said public official can also be sentenced for a criminal offence of perversion of justice,27 or for a criminal offence of urban planning corruption28 if the decision affects urban planning.

viii Defences

In Spain, legal entities can be exempted from criminal liability if a compliance programme is implemented and it is proven that the offender managed to bypass all the controls set by the company to prevent the crime from being committed. The defence based on compliance will be developed further below.

Moreover, in accordance with the SCC,29 a private individual or company that occasionally accepts a request of a bribe from a foreign public official is exempt from criminal liability if they file a report with the competent authorities:

  1. within two months of the offence being committed; and
  2. before an investigation into the facts is opened.

The offender will benefit from a mitigation of liability if they self-report the facts to the competent authorities, even if they do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements.

ix Settlements

Individuals and companies in Spain which are being investigated in criminal proceedings can reach a settlement agreement with the Public Prosecutor whereby they obtain a reduced sentence in exchange for pleading guilty.

x Civil and criminal enforcement

Under the Spanish Criminal Procedural Law, civil liability that arises from a criminal offence is tried within the criminal proceedings together with the criminal liability.

Enforcement: domestic bribery

In recent years, Spain has seen a series of domestic bribery cases involving well-known Spanish politicians and businesspersons alike. These cases have attracted media attention worldwide because of the public profile of the individuals involved and the amount of funds defrauded, which uncovered widespread corruption among Spain's main political parties.

Specialised law enforcement bodies have been created in order to investigate these corruption cases, such as the Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office, as well as special police units. The criminal law section of the Spanish National Court is in charge of trying the most challenging corruption cases involving several parties and jurisdictions.

Some of the more high profile corruption cases that are still being investigated by Spanish authorities are as follows.

i The Púnica investigation

The Púnica investigation is an ongoing investigation which began in 2013 concerning an extensive network of kickbacks for government contracts which implicates several Spanish political leaders – mainly members of Spain's Partido Popular (PP) – and businesspersons. Under this scheme, government officials awarded public contracts to a variety of businesspersons in exchange for bribes. The criminal offences which are being investigated include influence-peddling and money-laundering. The funds defrauded amount to €250 million. Two former presidents of the Madrid region are also being investigated in the framework of this case in relation to their alleged involvement in an illegal funding scheme for the Madrid branch of the PP.

ii The Gürtel investigation

The Gürtel investigation was another scandal involving kickbacks in exchange for public contracts which affected important Spanish businesspersons and local leaders of the PP. This scheme involved bribes paid to PP officials and used to illegally fund the party, as well as tax and account fraud and money laundering. The funds defrauded amount to €123 million. This case was also important since Spain's former Prime Minister was called to testify as a witness during the legal proceedings. Although he was not implicated as a co-conspirator, he was the first sitting Prime Minister called to testify as part of a criminal investigation. The court also held that the PP had profited from the effects of the criminal offence by obtaining a financial gain.

iii The Lezo investigation

The Lezo investigation focuses on another corruption scandal at the heart of the Madrid division of the PP between 2003 and 2015, which also affects several well-known Spanish companies (including a leading construction company). The investigation focuses on whether funds were channelled from a state-owned company to benefit members of the PP and involves illegal political party financing and foreign bribery.

Foreign bribery: legal framework

i Criminal offence of foreign bribery

In 1999, Spain ratified both the Council of Europe's civil and criminal law Conventions on Corruption. In the year 2000, Spain ratified the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions.

As a result of the international obligations undertaken under these conventions, the SCC was amended several times30 to transpose the corresponding criminal offences of corruption of foreign public officials.

Under the current regulation, the provisions of the SCC regarding domestic corruption and bribery are applicable to foreign bribery. In this regard, the SCC31 sets out that the legal regulations on domestic bribery are applicable when the criminal behaviour affects:

  1. any person who holds a legislative, administrative or judicial position in a country in the European Union (EU) or any other foreign country;
  2. any individual who carries out a public function for a member state of the EU or any other foreign country, including a public body or public company, for the EU or another international public organisation; and
  3. any civil servant or agent of the EU or an international public organisation.

The SCC only penalises active foreign bribery, i.e. the misconduct of the person who bribes or attempts to bribe a foreign public official. Conversely, the SCC does not sanction the misconduct perpetrated by the foreign public official who requests or accepts a bribery. The misconduct of the foreign public official is prosecuted and penalised in accordance with the laws applicable in the corresponding foreign country.

ii Definition of foreign public official

The SCC defines a foreign public official in the same way it does a Spanish public official, but it expands the concept to public officials of the EU or foreign countries.32

As stated above, the SCC's definition of foreign public official includes individuals who carry out a public function for any public body or state-owned or state-controlled company, for the EU or another international public organisation.

iii Jurisdiction

Spanish courts have jurisdiction to judge the offence of foreign bribery, committed abroad, if the following requirements are met:

  1. the offenders have Spanish nationality;
  2. the act is punishable in the place it was carried out, unless, under an international treaty or a legal act of an international organisation to which Spain is party, this requirement is not necessary;
  3. a criminal complaint has been filed by the aggrieved party or the public prosecutor; and
  4. the defendant has not been acquitted, exonerated or sentenced abroad, or, in the last case, has not complied with the sentence imposed.33

Spanish Courts can also investigate foreign private bribery offences (corruption in business or in international transactions) committed abroad34 whenever one of the following conditions are met:

  1. the procedure is conducted against a Spanish citizen;
  2. the procedure is conducted against a foreigner whose ordinary residence is in Spain;
  3. the criminal offence was committed by a director, administrator, employee, or partner of a company, association, foundation or organisation which has its headquarters or registered office in Spain; and
  4. the offence was committed by a legal entity, company, organisation, groups, or any other class of entities or groupings who have their seat or headquarters in Spain.

iv Corporate criminal liability

Both individuals and companies can be held criminally liable for bribery of foreign public officials. Companies shall be held criminally liable for these offences subject to the same requirements set out above for domestic bribery and corruption.

v Defences

The same defences outlined above for domestic bribery apply to the bribery of foreign public officials.

Associated offences: financial record-keeping and money laundering

i Spanish laws and regulations on financial record-keeping

The Spanish Companies Act35 contains the accounting rules for companies, including the duty of the Board of Directors to file the annual accounts with the commercial registry and the obligation for certain companies to have their accounts audited.

Other regulations36 require listed companies to have their annual accounts audited and to make their audit and financial reports public.

The General Tax Code37 also provides for the obligation to keep accounting books and records.38

Penalties for record-keeping violations

The penalties for violations relating to accounting and record-keeping are established in the tax and corporate regulations and in the SCC.

According to the Spanish Companies Act, failure to comply with the obligation to file annual accounts with the commercial registry can result in the company being ordered to pay a fine.39 Furthermore, failure to comply with the obligation to file the annual accounts can also be construed to be a failure of the company's directors to comply with their general duty of diligence,40 which can lead to a liability action by the company.41

Moreover, the General Tax Code expressly states that failure to comply with accounting and registration obligations constitutes a serious tax violation, which can lead to the imposition of a fine and temporary disbarment from obtaining public subsidies or tax benefits and from entering into contracts with the government.42

The SCC also provides for several accounting-related offences:

  1. accounting fraud:43 The falsification of the annual accounts or other documents that should reflect the legal or economic situation of the company can constitute a criminal offence under the SCC. This conduct is punishable with a prison sentence of one to three years and a fine of six to 12 months;44
  2. tax fraud:45 Failure to comply with the obligation to keep business accounting, books or tax records (e.g., keeping different accounts, making fictitious entries or failing to record transactions accurately) also constitutes an offence under the SCC. This conduct is punishable with a prison sentence of five to seven months;
  3. insolvency fraud:46 The SCC also punishes those who, while in a situation of insolvency, formulate the annual accounts or the accounting books in a manner contrary to the law, to hinder the assessment of the real economic situation of the debtor. This conduct is punishable with a prison sentence of one to four years and a fine of eight to 24 months;47 and
  4. investment fraud:48 With regard to listed companies, the SCC penalises the falsification and misrepresentation of the economic and financial information that the company must publish in accordance with stock market legislation. This conduct is punishable with a prison sentence of one to four years.

Bribes as non-tax-deductible expenses

The Corporate Tax Act49 expressly states that the costs of actions which are contrary to the legal system are non-deductible. The Spanish Directorate General for Taxation50 has included the payment of bribes as an example thereof.51

ii Spanish laws and regulations prohibiting money laundering

The SCC52 provides for the criminal offence of money laundering, which is punishable with a prison sentence of six months to six years and a fine of up to three times the value of the goods, in addition to the confiscation of the proceeds of the crime.

In addition, Spain has implemented two administrative regulations on the prevention of money laundering, namely: Law 10/2010 on the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing, and Royal Decree 304/2014 (the AML Regulations), which approves the regulation of Law 10/2010. These regulations establish the obligations for obliged entities to prevent money laundering (i.e., the adoption of due diligence measures and KYC procedures and compliance with their reporting obligations).

Prosecution under anti-money laundering laws

The Executive Service of the Commission for the Prevention of Money Laundering (SEPBLAC) is the authority in charge of enforcing and ensuring compliance with AML Regulations.

The Spanish Public Prosecutor Office and the criminal courts are in charge of prosecuting and investigating criminal offences related to money laundering.

Penalties for anti-money laundering violations

Non-compliance with the obligations on the prevention of money laundering is subject to administrative penalties under the AML regulations. Namely, the following penalties may be imposed:

  1. a private or public warning;
  2. a fine of up to the highest of the following amounts: 10 per cent of the total annual turnover of the company, two times the economic value of the operation, five times the amount of the benefits derived from the violation, or €10 million; or
  3. in the case of entities subject to administrative authorisation to operate (such as credit institutions), the temporary suspension or revocation of such authorisation.53

Obligation to disclose suspicious financial transactions

According to the AML Regulations, there is an obligation to report transactions which could reasonably be considered to be related to money laundering to the SEPBLAC (i.e., when the nature and amount of the transactions does not correspond to the volume of activity or background of the customer, or there is no economic, professional or business justification for carrying out the transaction, or both).54

Failure to comply with this duty to report is considered a serious offence under Law 10/2010.55

Enforcement: foreign bribery and associated offences

Although Spain has adequately transposed the international agreements on corruption highlighted above, by 2020, only nine investigations have been initiated in Spain involving bribery of foreign public officials, and only one trial has ended with the conviction of an individual for a foreign bribery offence.56

One of the investigations for alleged foreign bribery which is currently ongoing and has received wide media coverage in Spain is the 'Defex-Mercasa case', which affects two state-owned companies accused of paying millions in bribes to secure weapons contracts abroad.

International organisations and agreements

Spain is a member of several international organisations that deal with anti-corruption and anti-bribery matters, i.e. the United Nations, the Council of Europe and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Moreover, Spain is a signatory to, and has effectively transposed, the following international anti-corruption agreements:

  1. the United Nations Convention against Corruption;
  2. the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime;
  3. the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's Anti-Bribery Convention; and
  4. the Council of Europe's Criminal and Civil Law Conventions on Corruption.

Legislative developments

On 5 March 2019, the Spanish Ministry of Justice57 asked the Criminal Law Section of the General Coding Commission to draft a proposal to amend the SCC with regard to offences relating to political corruption.

This proposal aims to unify offences that are in some way related to corruption, such as illegal financing of political parties, misappropriation of funds, urban planning corruption and money laundering, so that they are all considered to be corruption-related offences.

Other laws affecting the response to corruption

In addition to the SCC, other Spanish laws, which do not deal directly with bribery and corruption, but contribute to the fight against corrupt practices in Spain by establishing more transparent public procedures and by regulating whistle-blowing channels that can be used to identify and report these offences, are the following:

  1. Law 19/2013, of 9 December 2013, on Transparency, Access to Public Information and Good Governance. The Spanish Government created a website in order to allow citizens to obtain information on matters such as the ongoing public tenders, the remuneration of high-ranking public officials and the subsidies granted to political parties;
  2. Law 9/2007, of 8 November 2007, on Public Procurement. This law aims towards more transparency, competition and publicity in public procurement;
  3. Law 8/2007, of 4 July 2007, on the Financing of Political Parties. This law regulates and establishes limits on donations to political parties; and
  4. Law 3/2018, of 5 December 2018, on Data Protection. This law regulates the creation of whistle-blowing channels within companies.


In Spain, corporate criminal liability was incorporated into the SCC in 2010 and further regulated in the 2015 reform of the SCC.58 According to this regulation, legal entities may be exempted from criminal liability if, among other requirements, the company has adopted, and effectively implemented, a compliance programme establishing monitoring and control measures for the prevention of crimes prior to the commission of the criminal offence. In the event that these requirements have only been partially met, the existence of a compliance programme can operate as a factor which mitigates the company's criminal liability.

Nowadays, the vast majority of medium-sized and large companies in Spain have implemented some kind of internal anti-corruption policy.

The first Spanish Supreme Court decision which sentenced a company by applying this regulation stated that corporate criminal liability relied on the absence of adequate control measures to prevent the commission of crimes (the 'compliance programmes').59 The Spanish Supreme Court has confirmed this case law in subsequent decisions since then.

Furthermore, the Spanish Office of the Public Prosecutor published some guidance on the criteria for assessing the effectiveness of a compliance programme in its Memorandum No. 1/2016 of 22 January 2016, which sets out the requirements of these programmes, namely that they must:

  1. implement measures that are adequate to prevent the commission of criminal offences within the company and that are adapted to the specific risks applicable to the company;
  2. establish a whistle-blowing channel to report possible risks and non-compliance to the internal control body in charge of monitoring compliance;
  3. establish a disciplinary system that adequately penalises any failure to comply with the measures laid down in the compliance programme; and
  4. establish a procedure to carry out periodic reviews and modifications of the compliance programme when relevant infringements are detected or when changes occur in the organisation, control structure or activity of the company.

Additionally, the International Organization for Standardisation standards ISO 19600:2014 and ISO 37001:2016, as well as the Spanish Association for Standardisation standard UNE 19601:2017, contain further guidance for implementing effective compliance programmes.

Outlook and conclusions

According to the 2019 Annual Report issued by the Spanish Prosecutor's Office, corruption, and especially political corruption, is currently one of the most serious issues affecting Spanish society, as evidenced in several reports and analyses carried out by different organisations. According to the latest survey carried out in 2019 by the Spanish Centre for Sociological Investigation, which measures public opinion in Spain, corruption and fraud was identified as the fourth most pressing problem for Spaniards (only behind unemployment, politics and economic problems). In 2017 and 2018, corruption was second.

Notwithstanding this, Spain's ranking in the 2019 Corruption Perception Index (CPI),60 which is published annually by the international NGO Transparency International (TI), has slightly improved, rising by four points compared to last year and obtaining a score of 62/100.61 Spain holds the 30th position out of the 180 countries that were part of the report (it was ranked in the 41st position in 2018), and was ranked 13th out of the 28 European Union countries, although it is still below the European average.

According to experts in the matter, this minor development could be due – at least preliminarily – to the first convictions delivered in several corruption scandals that have appeared in recent years, the lower number of cases in the past two years and the vote of no confidence in the former government following one of the most important cases that had an international impact and that led, for the first time, to a change in government.

However, according to the report published by TI on 23 January 2020, this does not mean that Spain has made sufficient advancements in implementing corruption-prevention mechanisms, and corruption continues to be a pressing issue. In light of this, TI has urged the Spanish government to carry out the necessary legal reforms, like implementing whistle-blower protection regulations.

In conclusion, although advancements have been made in recent years in relation to the enforcement of bribery laws, as evidenced by the convictions in corruption cases, there is still a long path ahead, and the Spanish government will have to implement the necessary legal reforms to ensure political integrity and the correct functioning of public entities.


1 Adriana de Buerba is the head of, and Edurne Álvarez is part of, the white collar crime and investigations practice area at Pérez-Llorca.

2 Article 419 of the SCC.

3 Article 420 of the SCC.

4 Article 421 of the SCC.

5 Article 422 of the SCC.

6 Article 424 of the SCC.

7 Spanish Supreme Court ruling no. 343/2019, dated 4 July 2019 [RJ 2019\2957].

8 See Spanish Supreme Court ruling no. 21024/2016, dated 17 March 2017 [RJ\2017\1146].

9 Articles 428, 429 and 430 of the SCC.

10 Articles 432, 433, 433 bis, 434 and 435 of the SCC.

11 Articles 436, 437 and 438 of the SCC.

12 Articles 439, 440, 441, 442 and 443 of the SCC.

13 Article 24.2 of the SCC.

14 Article 423 of the SCC.

15 Article 286 bis of the SCC.

16 Article 304 bis of the SCC.

17 Article 31 bis of the SCC.

18 Articles 419 to 424 of the SCC.

19 A daily rate is set, ranging from a minimum of EUR 2 and a maximum of EUR 400 (see Article 50 of the SCC).

20 A daily rate is set, ranging from a minimum of EUR 30 and a maximum of EUR 5,000 (see Article 50 of the SCC).

21 Article 427 bis of the SCC.

22 Article 424.3 of the SCC.

23 Articles 33.7 and 66 of the SCC.

24 Article 39.1 of Law 9/2017 on Public Procurement in connection with article 47.1 d) of Law 39/2015 on the Public Administrations General Administrative Proceedings.

25 Article 127 and following articles of the SCC.

26 Article 122 of the SCC.

27 Article 404 and following articles of the SCC.

28 Article 320 and following articles of the SCC.

29 Article 416 of the SCC.

30 By virtue of Law 3/2000, 11 January 2000; Law 1/2015, 30 March 2015; and Law 1/2019, 20 February 2019.

31 Article 427 of the SCC.

32 Article 427 of the SCC.

33 Article 23.2 of the Organic Law of the Judiciary.

34 Article 23.4 n) of the Organic Law of the Judiciary.

35 Royal Decree 1/2010, of 2 July, approving the Spanish Companies Act.

36 See Royal Decree 4/2015, of 23 October, approving the Stock Exchange Act; Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 on the prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading on a regulated market; and Regulation (EU) 596/2014 on market abuse.

37 Law 58/2003, of 17 December, on General Taxation.

38 Article 29.2.d) of the General Tax Code.

39 Article 283 of the Spanish Companies Act.

40 Article 225 of the Spanish Companies Act.

41 Article 236 of the Spanish Companies Act.

42 Article 200 of the General Tax Code.

43 Article 290 of the SCC.

44 A daily rate is set, ranging from a minimum of €2 and a maximum of €400 (see Article 50 of the SCC).

45 Article 310 of the SCC.

46 Article 259.1.8) of the SCC.

47 A daily rate is set, ranging from a minimum of €2 and a maximum of €400 (see Article 50 of the SCC).

48 Article 282 bis of the SCC.

49 Law 27/2014, of 17 November, on Corporate Tax.

50 Dirección General de Tributos.

51 Decision of 4 April 2016, of the Directorate General for Taxation, regarding the deductibility of interest on tax arrears, in application of Corporate Tax Act 27/2014 (BOE No. 83, of 6 April 2016).

52 Articles 301 and following of the SCC.

53 Chapter VIII of Law 10/2010.

54 Articles 17 and following of Law 10/2010.

55 Article 52 of Law 10/2010.

56 Spanish National Court (Criminal Law Section) ruling no. 3/2017, dated 23 February 2017 [ARP 2017\366].

57 Order of the Spanish Ministry of Justice dated 5 March 2019.

58 Article 31 bis of the SCC.

59 Spanish Supreme Court ruling No. 154/2016, dated 29 February 2016 [RJ 2016\600].

60 The CPI is the global indicator of corruption in the public sector.

61 The higher the score, the lower the level of corruption.

Get unlimited access to all The Law Reviews content