The Asset Management Review: Australia

Overview of recent activity

Australia has one of the largest asset management markets in the world, with a savings pool in excess of A$2 trillion led by a sophisticated superannuation (pension) fund and investment management industry and one of the world's largest sovereign wealth funds: the Future Fund. Annual growth of the investible asset pool is also underpinned by the statutorily mandated employer pension contribution regime (superannuation). Australian and foreign asset management firms have continued to attract investment mandates from the burgeoning Australian superannuation fund pool, including in real estate, infrastructure and private equity opportunities.

The federal government has maintained an open stance for foreign investors, in particular with substantial investment in Australian real estate, agriculture and infrastructure in recent years.

In recent years, this openness to investment has been supported by further legislative refinements and regulatory policy pronouncements aimed at enhancing the effectiveness of investment structures used across most asset classes. The Australian managed investment trust (MIT) structure has continued to be accepted as an appropriate vehicle for access to Australian investment opportunities in the real estate, infrastructure and private equity sectors. With an MIT, the trustee may make an irrevocable statutory capital account election that will deem any eligible investment realisation gain to be a capital gain, and as such, non-resident investors will generally not be subject to Australian tax on these gains (unless the gain relates to a direct or indirect interest in real property situated in Australia or if the gain is in respect of certain interests in a limited partnership). Additionally, eligible investors that are residents in an expanded list of foreign countries may access a concessional withholding tax of 15 per cent on 'fund payments' (e.g., net rental income) made by MITs in respect of certain asset classes. The concessional withholding tax regime is designed to attract investment through an expanded list of local and foreign investment funds, pension funds, sovereign wealth funds and other institutional investors.

The Australian MIT regime has also benefited from the introduction several years ago of the attribution managed investment trust (AMIT) regime. The AMIT regime provides the ability of MITs to be administered with greater flexibility and with the aim of providing a statutory safe harbour curing certain tax uncertainty that traditionally attached to unit trusts. The industry has seen a heavy adoption of the AMIT regime over the past few years.

The government has also followed through with other key modernisation measures, and in 2019, introduced revised draft legislation governing a new form of managed fund in Australia, the 'corporate collective investment vehicle'. The new regime is envisaged to make the funds landscape in Australia more marketable to foreign markets that are less familiar with trust structures. The federal government has also proposed the introduction of a limited partnership collective investment vehicle regime.

General introduction to the regulatory framework

The Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) is the primary legislation governing asset management sector players. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is the primary securities regulator, and monitors and enforces the Corporations Act and the associated Australian financial services licence (AFSL) regime.

An AFSL is required in order to cover a range of regulated activities, including:

  1. the provision of investment management advice;
  2. the offer of interests in an investment fund;
  3. the provision of custodial and depository services;
  4. prime brokerage and other brokerage;
  5. market-making activity;
  6. underwriting; and
  7. the operation of registered and unregistered investment funds.

Investment funds structured as managed investment schemes generally require registration (as registered managed investment schemes) with ASIC if offered to retail clients, and may register voluntarily in other cases (for example, if offered only to wholesale clients). Wholesale clients comprise certain institutional, sophisticated and professional investors meeting relevant thresholds prescribed by the Corporations Act.

A private placement memorandum, information memorandum or other offering memorandum for an investment fund in which only wholesale clients may invest does not need to be in a prescribed form or include prescribed statements or information, and does not need not be lodged with ASIC. However, various market misconduct requirements under the Corporations Act (aimed at preventing misleading or deceptive conduct in the provision of financial services) will apply to an offering memorandum regardless of whether it needs to be lodged with ASIC.

A holder of an AFSL must:

  1. maintain minimum regulatory capital;
  2. put in place adequate arrangements for the management of conflicts of interest;
  3. have adequate risk management systems;
  4. report significant breaches to ASIC; and
  5. ensure personnel are trained and supervised.

An AFSL holder is subject to an overarching duty to ensure that financial services are provided efficiently, honestly and fairly. Following market sentiment that executive members of financial services entities were falling below the expectations and standards of the community for ethical behaviour, the most in-depth review of corporate Australia ever undertaken commenced in December 2017, with the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry (Royal Commission). On 4 February 2019, Commissioner Kenneth Hayne delivered his final report (the Hayne Report), which made recommendations aimed at improving the culture and regulation of the financial sector in Australia.

Subject to some limited exemptions, issuers of interests in, and managers of, investment funds will generally need to hold an AFSL (regardless of whether the investors in the fund are retail clients or wholesale clients).

ASIC has traditionally provided regulated firms from the US, UK, Hong Kong, Singapore and Germany with the ability to apply for access to a statutory passport-like regime covering financial services to wholesale clients in Australia. ASIC has also provided relief for foreign firms that do not carry on business in Australia from the need to hold an AFSL to provide financial services to wholesale clients in Australia. A limited 'foreign AFS licence' regime was introduced in 2020 and provides a modified pathway for access to the Australian wholesale market by foreign regulated firms.

Other regulatory bodies relevant to the asset management sector are as follows:

  1. the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), which primarily focuses on the prudential regulation of banks, insurance companies, superannuation funds and, most recently, non-bank lenders;
  2. the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), which prescribes rules governing the listing of investment funds on the ASX, including listed REITs and exchange traded funds, as well as rules governing the conduct of market operators and brokers;
  3. the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre, which administers Australia's anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing laws, including rules relating to identification of investors in investment funds and counterparties to derivative transactions;
  4. the Foreign Investment Review Board (FIRB), which screens applications for foreign investment into Australia, in particular with respect to investment into residential property, large commercial real estate investments, agricultural investments, infrastructure, or other investments above certain monetary thresholds or that raise national interest considerations. Additional screening requirements apply for investment by foreign government investors (including sovereign wealth funds) and investment funds and other entities in which any foreign government investor has a significant interest;
  5. the Takeovers Panel, which focuses on resolving takeover or corporate control-related disputes arising in relation to listed or other widely held entities; and
  6. the Australian Taxation Office, which is the federal revenue collection agency, and is also charged with regulating the self-managed superannuation fund sector.

Common asset management structures

i Unit trusts (managed investment schemes)

The investment fund vehicle most commonly used in Australia is the unit trust. A unit trust is a legal arrangement under which a trustee is bound as a fiduciary to administer the pool of assets on behalf of beneficiaries who hold unitised interests in the pool. Unit trusts are regulated as 'managed investment schemes' under the Corporations Act. Unit trusts are generally required to be registered with ASIC if offered to retail clients (in which case, the trust becomes known as a registered managed investment scheme and its trustee becomes known as the responsible entity of the registered managed investment scheme). Registration is optional for a unit trust that is offered only to wholesale clients.

Unit trusts investing in portfolio interests in financial assets or core real estate will generally have tax-transparency, and distributions will instead be taxable in the hands of unitholders (if Australian tax residents) or on a withholding basis (from distributions to non-Australian tax resident unitholders). However, a public unit trust that carries on a trading business for a relevant tax year is treated as if it were a company for most tax purposes, including being subject to the applicable corporate tax rate. A unit trust will be considered to carry on a trading business if it conducts real estate development or similar activities or controls an operating entity.

Unit trusts that are eligible to meet the criteria for MIT status may attract a concessional taxation profile, including (potentially) a concessional withholding tax rate (15 per cent) on distributions of rental income by real estate-based MITs to non-resident investors. Additionally, MITs can elect for capital account treatment of gains on the realisation of eligible investments (subject to various exceptions including land held as trading stock, debt interests and certain financial arrangements), which may be advantageous to both Australian and foreign resident investors. For example, non-resident investors are only subject to withholding under the capital account election in relation to gains from the disposal of an interest held (directly, or in some cases, indirectly) by the MIT in real property situated in Australia (defined broadly). Australian resident individuals and superannuation funds, on the other hand, can access discounted capital gains tax treatment where the relevant investment was held by the MIT for at least 12 months.

Eligibility for MIT status requires, among other things, satisfaction of certain requirements, including a requirement that certain investment management decisions be made within Australia, a widely held requirement (which may potentially be satisfied also if a substantial part of the unitholder base comprises certain types of widely held unitholders, such as pension funds), and an investment strategy that excludes the taking of controlling interests in portfolio entities that carry on a trading business.

Unit trusts may be operated in any manner as determined in the trust deed adopted by the trustee, which may, for example, provide for operation either as an evergreen or closed-end fund.

ii Investment companies

Corporations are not commonly used as investment fund vehicles, given that taxation is levied at the company level. Revised draft legislation has recently been introduced to provide the asset management industry with the ability to adopt a corporate collective investment vehicle structure that operates on a tax pass-through basis, subject to operating within the parameters of the legislation.

iii Limited partnerships

There are two types of limited partnerships available under state-based legislation: an incorporated limited partnership and an unincorporated limited partnership.

Unincorporated limited partnerships are rarely used as investment funds, particularly as their limitation of liability regime for limited partners is less favourable than the corresponding regime in relation to incorporated limited partnerships. An incorporated limited partnership is given separate legal personality as a body corporate, and its limited partners have a statutory limitation on liability for the debts of the incorporated limited partnership (provided limited partners do not take part in the management of the incorporated limited partnership or otherwise fall within the statutory safe harbour against such liability). Incorporated limited partnerships are commonly used (along with MIT structures) in the private equity and venture capital asset classes.

Limited partnerships are taxed as companies in Australia unless they are registered with the government as venture capital limited partnerships (VCLPs), early stage venture capital limited partnerships (ESVCLPs) or Australian funds of funds (AFOFs), or they are established as venture capital management partnerships that act as general partners of a VCLP, ESVCLP or AFOF. The legislation governing these types of limited partnerships was designed to encourage Australian and foreign investment into the private equity and venture capital asset classes, particularly in relation to early stage and other venture capital investments.

In the case of VCLPs, eligible foreign investors will generally not be subject to withholding tax on gains distributed to them as limited partners.

In the case of ESVCLPs, resident and foreign investors will generally be exempt from any tax on gains distributed to them as limited partners, and certain tax credits may also be available to limited partners.

An AFOF is permitted to invest into VCLPs, ESVCLPs and co-investment opportunities originated by underlying VCLPs and ESVCLPs.

iv Segregated mandates

A substantial part of the institutional investor asset pool is allocated to managers by way of segregated mandates under an investment management agreement arrangement or through a 'fund of one' structure (whereby the institutional investor is the sole investor in the fund entity, subject to any carried interest and any investment commitment made by the fund manager or any of its affiliates). A benefit of such arrangements is that the institutional investor may agree a bespoke mandate with the asset manager, including terms as to investment strategy, management fees, performance fees and carried interest terms, matters that require approval by the institutional investor and reporting requirements, as well as leverage the existing custodial arrangements of the investor.

Main sources of investment

The funds management services industry has continued to perform strongly in recent years. In particular, funds sourced from overseas markets have grown significantly, with a positive impact on industry revenue, which is forecast to grow at an annualised 3.1 per cent to reach A$9.3 billion over the next few years.

Some drivers of revenue growth include the Australian share market's performance, the impact of movements of investment markets in driving performance fees, consolidation leading to economies of scale, growing funds under management and increased outsourcing of back-office operations to third parties. Balancing this is some evidence of downward management fee trends caused by increased competition, including from new technology solutions such as robo-advice. Looking ahead, the continuing popularity of alternative investment products and also Australia's aging population should support further industry revenue growth.

Key trends

i Introduction of corporate and limited partnership fund structures

In the 2016–2017 budget, as part of the Ten Year Enterprise Tax Plan, the government announced that it would introduce tax and regulatory frameworks for two new types of collective investment vehicles (CIVs): the corporate collective investment vehicle (CCIV) and the limited partnership CIV. On 19 January 2019, the Treasury released comprehensive exposure drafts of both the regulatory and tax legislation for the CCIV regime. The CCIV regime enables asset management firms to structure an investment fund as a corporation, and is designed to be an internationally recognisable investment vehicle that can be marketed to foreign investors. Legislation facilitating more widespread use of a limited partnership structure is also proposed (currently, limited partnerships are used only in the private equity and venture capital sectors). The overarching aim of such legislation is to provide a choice of tax-transparent structures (unit trusts, corporations or limited partnerships) but with equivalent governance features. The introduction of these alternative structures reflects industry feedback that corporations and limited partnerships are more familiar legal structures in many markets outside Australia, including across Asia.

The new structures aim to complement other recently enacted legislation (the Corporations Amendment (Asia Region Funds Passport) Act 2018) aimed at facilitating the cross-border marketing of similarly regulated fund products across jurisdictions that are signatories to the new Asia Region Funds Passport regime (initially Australia, South Korea, Thailand, New Zealand and Japan).

ii Reform of stapled structures and other integrity measures

Infrastructure funds and private equity real estate funds commonly adopt stapled fund structures that involve an investor subscribing for interests in a trust (MIT) and either interests in a taxpaying trust or interests (in the form of shares) in an investment company. The interests of each investor in these entities are contractually stapled together in the sense that a dealing in an interest of an investor in one entity requires a corresponding dealing in the interest of the investor in the other entity. Under a typical stapled structure, the MIT would invest in entities that do not carry out a trading business (such as entities holding real estate that is not being developed), and the other entity would invest in trading entities (such as entities that hold real estate that is being developed).

In April 2019, measures were introduced to address perceived risks posed by stapled structures and similar arrangements and limit access to concessions currently available to foreign investors for passive income. Following surveillance by the Treasury, concerns were raised over situations where a tax-transparent stapled entity was investing in developed real estate and leasing that real estate to another stapled entity to carry on a trading business on that real estate. The Treasury flagged that these types of stapled structures were sometimes used in ways to convert what would otherwise be 'active income' into 'passive income', which in turn has produced a competitive advantage to investors that are not residents in Australia. The new measures increased the MIT withholding tax rate on fund payments that are attributable to 'non-concessional MIT income' from 15 to 30 per cent. The non-concessional MIT withholding rate imposed on cross staple arrangements generally does not apply to traditional commercial property structures, which do not involve an 'asset entity' leasing or licensing assets (such as real estate) or lending money to an 'operating entity' that generates active business income. The new measures are not limited to stapled instruments, and can apply where there is 80 per cent common ownership by external entities across the asset entity and operating entity. The new measures are highly complex and are accompanied by various exceptions and transitional arrangements.

The Stapled Structures Act also makes the following changes:

  1. modifying the thin capitalisation rules to prevent 'double gearing' structures;
  2. limiting the withholding tax exemption for foreign pension funds to interest and dividend income derived from portfolio-like interests where the income is exempt from income tax in the country in which it resides and the fund does not have influence (either directly or indirectly) over decisions that comprise the control and direction of the operations of the entity that pays the dividends; and
  3. codifying a longstanding administrative sovereign immunity tax exemption for non-commercial investments, and limiting it to portfolio-like interests and only where the sovereign investor cannot influence key decision-making of the portfolio entity.

iii Royal Commission inquiry into the financial services sector

The Royal Commission, which grabbed headlines for much of 2018, concluded with Commissioner Hayne delivering his report on 4 February 2019. Perhaps one of the most scrutinised sectors over the course of the Royal Commission was the financial advice industry, which led many commentators to forecast that the Commissioner would take a strong stance against vertical integration. The vertical integration model involves financial advisers and banks both making and selling financial products, and therefore raises conflict considerations. The Commissioner made recommendations on the management of conflicts of interest and executive remuneration. The effects of the recommendations in the Hayne Report on the financial advice industry will be fully understood if and when legislation is passed. Also, in response to the Hayne Report, the federal government budget for 2019–2020 allocated increased funding to the sector's regulators, APRA and ASIC, and draft legislation has been announced that strengthens the enforcement tools available to ASIC.

iv Australian financial services licensing of foreign financial services providers

Following a consultation process, ASIC has adopted a mandatory 'foreign AFSL' regime for offshore asset managers that are interested in advisory or asset management relationships with wholesale clients in Australia. The foreign AFSL regime mirrors the existing AFSL regime, subject to the relaxation of a number of regulations where the foreign financial services provider is otherwise regulated under a sufficiently equivalent foreign regulatory regime.

The foreign AFSL regime will replace the passport regime currently relied on by foreign financial services providers from a number of jurisdictions with regulatory regimes that are viewed as sufficiently equivalent to the Australian regime. Under previous law, foreign financial services providers that are regulated by their equivalent securities regulator in the US, UK, Hong Kong, Singapore or Germany were able to access relief from the need to hold an AFSL (via a passport like application to ASIC) to provide financial services to wholesale clients in Australia. New passports are no longer issued. Existing passport holders are required to transition to a foreign AFSL.

v Reporting measures for credit funds

An expanded range of lenders (potentially covering debt funds) with more than A$50 million in loan receivables are subject to obligations to report on their lending activities to APRA. The aim is to enable APRA to capture and monitor some of the metrics otherwise captured from traditional bank lenders.

vi Strengthening the dispute resolution body

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has a higher monetary limit (A$1 million) and a higher compensation cap (A$500,000) for most non-superannuation disputes, and unlimited monetary jurisdiction for superannuation disputes.

Sectoral regulation

i Insurance

The insurance industry is regulated by (APRA) and ASIC. As the prudential regulator, APRA sets out both standards and practice guides for the life and general insurance industry. ASIC focuses on consumer protection.

The rules regarding the investment of insurance premiums for life insurance are set out in the Life Insurance Act 1995 (Cth). The Insurance Act 1973 (Cth) sets out some rules regarding the eligible assets that are required to be held by general insurers; however, there are no restrictions on investments that can be held by insurance companies other than the trust account requirements under the Corporations Act. APRA has issued a number of prudential standards that regulate the activities of both life insurers and general insurers from a prudential perspective.

The insurance industry has recently experienced a high level of digital disruption, and there are a number of emerging disruption models, such as virtual insurance advisers and P2P network operators that are likely to shake up the general insurance and life insurance industry in Australia.2

ii Pensions

Pensions are referred to as 'superannuation' in Australia. APRA has the primary regulatory responsibility for superannuation funds under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth). However, ASIC also plays a role in superannuation, as the trustee of any superannuation fund is required to hold an Australian financial services licence and be subject to the licensing, conduct and disclosure rules under Chapter 7 of the Corporations Act (which are supervised by ASIC).

Australians have approximately A$2.7 trillion in superannuation assets, making Australia the fourth largest in the world in terms of pension fund assets.3 These assets are held by APRA regulated superannuation entities, self-managed superannuation funds, exempt public sector superannuation schemes and life office statutory funds. The sheer size of this asset pool is attributed to the compulsory superannuation guarantee scheme, which requires employers to currently contribute 9.5 per cent of their employees' wages and salaries to a designated superannuation fund.

The Treasury Laws Amendment (Protecting Your Superannuation Package) Act 2019 (Cth) introduced the 'protecting your super' package, which limits the fees charged by funds, requires insurance to be opt-in for certain individuals and facilitates the consolidation of low balance super accounts.

Under recent Federal Budgets, the government has also announced a new retirement income framework that covers a retirement covenant and standardised product disclosure metrics. Following on from recommendations directed towards the financial sector's regulators in the Royal Commission, APRA and ASIC have both received increased funding to facility greater enforcement activities.

The government has also announced that it intends to draft legislation that will require new entrants to the workforce be given only one default superannuation account. The announcement follows the Productivity Commission's report Superannuation: Assessing Efficiency and Competitiveness and recommendations in the Report to limit a person's superannuation account to one default account, in order to prevent inappropriate account erosion.

iii Real property

Australian real estate investment funds continue to attract substantial inflows from Australia and foreign investors.

As discussed above, one of the key reforms affecting the real estate and infrastructure investor sector is legislation affecting the concessional withholding tax treatment of fund payments attributable to income derived by cross stapled MIT investment structures and rent from other arrangements in relation to agricultural land. These laws impact real estate and infrastructure investment structures, particularly where those investments comprise investment in real estate and in a portfolio entity that carries on a business on the real estate.

As also discussed above, Australia's foreign investment laws require approval by FIRB of certain acquisitions of interests in Australian real estate, depending on the nature and size of the investment. A stricter regime applies if the acquisition is by a 'foreign government investor' (which broadly captures entities including funds) in which a foreign government or foreign government body has an interest of 20 per cent or more. In light of the covid-19 pandemic's impact on the economy, the Federal Treasurer introduced regulations temporarily increasing the range of transactions that require FIRB approval.

Australia's foreign investment laws also allow investors and investment funds to apply for 'exemption certificates' in certain circumstances (which apply as a form of pre-approval by FIRB of certain investments by the applicant that meet some common criteria). Exemption certificates are increasingly sought by investors and investment funds that wish to obtain pre-approval by FIRB of a future programme of acquisitions, particularly given the time and costs that would otherwise be involved in having to make individual applications for each proposed investment. An exemption certificate generally applies for a prescribed period (commonly one year), and covers acquisitions that meet certain pre-approved criteria and have an acquisition value below the prescribed individual acquisition amounts (subject to an aggregate overall acquisition value).

Furthermore, a noteworthy condition for FIRB approval in relation to certain types of acquisitions (primarily real estate) is that the applicant demonstrates that the relevant vendor has undertaken a transparent advertising process to market the investment for sale in the Australian market prior to investment by the relevant foreign person.

iv Hedge funds

The Australian market has seen a heightened level of market activity by activist hedge funds. This has included actions by certain hedge funds calling for shareholder meetings to agitate for a change in the board or overall strategy of a portfolio company.

A high-profile foreign hedge fund (with an investment strategy that included short selling) attracted considerable attention following publication of its in-house research asserting that the value of a particular ASX-listed company (which carried on an investment management business) was less than half the value reported by the company to the market. The company's share price experienced a dramatic decline. Some market commentators have called for a review of the application of Australian laws (including market misconduct rules and AFSL laws) in relation to foreign short sellers making announcements in the Australian market.

In recent years, hedge funds have had to prepare for the commencement of APRA prudential requirements for margining and risk mitigation of non-centrally cleared derivatives (APRA Prudential Standard CPS 226), which is one of the latest outcomes of the G20's response to the financial crisis. This has involved completion of self-disclosure documents and entry into new credit support documents for hedge funds that trade with a bank or other prudentially regulated entity to which the Australian margin rules apply, or any other financial institution to which any foreign margin rules apply.

v Private equity

As discussed above, venture capital funds in Australia are commonly structured as closed-end incorporated limited partnerships that are registered with the government as VCLPs or ESVCLPs. However, given the legislative restrictions that apply to the investment activities of VCLPs and ESVCLPs (most notably, the restriction on investing in a portfolio entity that has assets totalling more than A$250 million), venture capital fund structures may include, or allow the establishment of, alternative investment vehicles to make investments that a VCLP is restricted from making. The most common alternative investment vehicle structure is parallel MITs that co-invest in the investment opportunity that falls outside the permitted investment activities of the VCLP. The alternative investment vehicles may be used to invest in more than one portfolio entity.

Private equity funds in Australia are most commonly structured as parallel closed-end MITs. The parallel fund structure gives cornerstone investors, and other investors that are making large commitments to the fund, the opportunity to each invest separately in a parallel fund entity, and for all other investors to invest in a pooled parallel fund entity. The opportunity for a larger investor to invest separately in a parallel fund entity that qualifies as an MIT affords an investor that is a superannuation fund, pension fund or other widely held fund greater control in satisfying the ongoing widely held test that applies to the MIT.

Some common variations to the parallel fund structure for private equity funds include the use of a foreign parallel fund entity for some or all of the foreign investors, and the use of a parallel VCLP (together with alternative investment vehicles as discussed above) for some or all of the domestic superannuation fund investors and some or all of the foreign investors.

Access to co-investment opportunities (on a no management fee and no carried interest basis) remains a key focus of many larger domestic institutional investors. However, the use of overflow or co-investment funds by domestic private equity funds as means of co-investment access by investors remains less common than in other developed markets. The more common approach is for co-investment opportunities to be presented on a case-by-case basis to one or more of the larger investors, and for the co-investments to be undertaken directly by those investors.

Management fees for domestic private equity funds still tend to be set at 2 per cent per annum of committed capital (dropping down to invested capital after the investment period) but with the possibility, in some cases, of fee rebates under side letters for cornerstone or larger investors. Carried interest has generally remained at a rate of 20 per cent of distributed profits (on a whole-of-fund basis) subject to a preferred return of 8 per cent per annum to investors and a carried interest catch-up (at a rate ranging from 50 to 100 per cent). Director fees, transaction fees and break-up fees are commonly offset at a rate of 100 per cent against management fees.

Private equity funds in Australia largely adopt the best practice reporting and valuation guidelines formulated by their industry body, the Australian Private Equity and Venture Capital Association, and are largely aligned with the private equity principles formulated by the Institutional Limited Partners Association. As the domestic private equity funds industry continues to attract significant investment from foreign investors, we also expect to see the continued alignment of domestic private equity funds terms with those in other developed private equity markets.

Tax law

As discussed above, the tax profile of funds, managers and investors is driven by the particular vehicle used and the particular investment activities undertaken by it. Overall, government has maintained an investor and manager-friendly policy stance, with further legislative refinements aimed at facilitating internationally recognisable fund structures, including proposed reforms that will enable broader use of corporations and limited partnerships as collective investment vehicles.

Again as above, one recent area of Treasury focus has been in relation to the use of stapled investment holding structures, which are commonly used by domestic and foreign investors, particularly to access real estate and infrastructure investment opportunities. Existing stapled structures and MITs investing in agriculture and residential housing may access the transitional arrangements, which can apply for seven to 15 years; however, the integrity measures relating to cross stapled arrangements will need to be taken into account in the design of investment holding vehicles.


Further M&A activity is expected in Australia, as the Royal Commission led focus on vertically integrated financial services firms is leading to some such firms demerging their financial product issuance businesses from their financial planning and investment advisory businesses.

The introduction of alternative collective investment structures, coupled with the Asia Region Funds Passport, should assist Australian asset managers to more effectively access foreign investor markets.

Australian managers should continue to be supported by the reforms of several years ago, and since adopted in practice, under the investment manager regime, which removes some traditional tax uncertainty associated with foreign funds engaging with Australian managers.

In terms of foreign asset manager access to the Australian investor market, the new foreign AFS licence regime involves an upfront cost in the associated application process. This should, however, provide certainty for managers in terms of a clear pathway for access to the Australian market, as well as enhance Australian investor confidence associated with engaging with foreign managers.

The industry is expecting sustained foreign investor interest in Australian real estate, agriculture and infrastructure investment exposure. MIT structures are becoming understood by more and more well-known large foreign investors, and accepted as the gateway necessary to access a concessional withholding tax profile and deemed capital account election.



1 Fadi C Khoury, Kon Mellos and Michael Chaaya are partners at Corrs Chambers Westgarth.

3 'Superannuation Statistics'. The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia.

Get unlimited access to all The Law Reviews content