The Public-Private Partnership Law Review: Vietnam
The Vietnamese government reported on 30 January 2019 that 336 PPP projects have been implemented in Vietnam with a total investment capital of 1,609,335 billion Vietnamese dong (approximately equivalent to US$69 billion), 140 of which are in the form of build–operate–transfer (BOT) (accounting for 70.7 per cent of the total investment capital of PPP projects), 188 of which are in the form of build–transfer (BT) (accounting for 28.9 per cent of the same).2 According to the report, the transport infrastructure projects represent 65.47 per cent (220 projects) of the total number of the PPP projects. The remaining PPP projects are held mainly by technical infrastructure projects (9.52 per cent), head office construction projects (5.95 per cent), energy projects (5.35 per cent), water supply, sewerage and environmental projects (5.35 per cent).
In 1986, the Đổi Mới policy adopted at the Sixth National Congress of the Communist Party of Vietnam introduced market economy to Vietnam and opened the market to foreign investors. Since then, Vietnam has faced a gap between the huge demand for infrastructure development with a rapidly growing population and economy and a scarce governmental budget, and, therefore, an expectation of private funds for the infrastructure development has existed. The history of PPP legislation in Vietnam started in 1992, when the amended Foreign Investment Law mentioned BOT for the first time. In 1994, it was reported that the first BOT contract was entered into for the water treatment plant project of Binh An Water Corporation Limited.3 In this phase, PPP legislation was limited mainly for foreign investment and several PPP projects with foreign investors emerged.
Around the time of the start of the Asian currency crisis in 1997, Decree 77-CP dated 18 June 1997 also provided BOT regulations for full participation of domestic investors for the first time. At this stage, PPP projects of domestic investors were mainly established by the state-owned enterprises (SOEs) with the aim of implementing such projects without state budget allocation, but those aims were not always successful.4
With Vietnam's participation in the World Trade Organisation, distinctions between the foreign investors and domestic investors were abolished in principle,5 and BOT regulations were also unified in 2007. Subsequently, two regulations for PPPs – Decree 108/2009/ND-CP and Prime Minister Decision 71/2010/QD-TTg – co-existed without mutual coordination for a while, but this confusing situation was resolved in 2015 by Decree 15/2015/ND-CP (which was replaced by Decree 63/2018/ND-CP, taking effect on 19 June 2018). Decree 30/2015/ND-CP on selection of investors and Decree 63/2018/ND-CP are currently in effect for PPP regulations in Vietnam.
The year in review
In 2017, the Standing Committee of the National Assembly issued Resolution No. 437/NQ-UBTVQH14, in which the government and the Prime Minister are requested to establish a PPP law. The draft PPP law has been submitted to the eighth Session of the National Assembly (November 2019) for their comments.6 The PPP Law is scheduled to be submitted to the ninth Session of the National Assembly in 2020 for their approval.7 It is expected to set, among the others, the criteria for the selection of PPP projects, the mechanism to effectively control the state capital invested in PPP projects, and the risk sharing mechanism between the state and the investors of PPP projects.
As a matter of fact, the Vietnamese government is calling for PPP investments in many projects,8 and it is no surprise that the Vietnamese government is making efforts to improve its PPP framework to attract more foreign investors. On the other hand, controlling the increasing public debt is also an inevitable task for the Vietnamese government. Conditions for government guarantee and undertakings (GGU) are becoming stricter in Law No. 83/2015/QH13 on State Budget, Law No. 20/2017/QH14 on Public Debt Management and Decree No. 91/2018/ND-CP on issuance and management of government guarantee. In 2017, no GGU was issued.9 The unavailability of the GGU was one of the major blockages for foreign investors to establish international standard PPP projects in Vietnam with appropriate risk allocation between the public and private sectors, and the trend of imposing stricter conditions may further frustrate foreign investors. Except for projects for thermal power plants using imported coals,10 it is not easy for foreign investors to be granted GGU for their PPP projects in Vietnam. In 2018, US$1.7 billion GGUs were provided, but only for thermal power plant projects.11
As a result, there may be a higher likelihood of the following two types of domestic investors successfully implementing PPP projects in Vietnam: (1) strong domestic investors such as major SOEs that have enough influence to procure GGU; and (2) domestic investors who can implement PPP projects without a government guarantee by utilising domestic loans from state-invested banks, such as the Joint Stock Commercial Bank for Investment and Development of Vietnam (BIDV), the Joint Stock Commercial Bank for Foreign Trade of Vietnam (Vietcombank) and the Joint Stock Commercial Bank for Industry and Trade (VietinBank). The latter pattern is predominant in the area of road infrastructure projects. It is said that the state-invested banks mentioned above are taking huge commercial risks in such areas (including step-in rights) and are currently bridging the gap between the huge demand for infrastructure development and a scarce state budget.
Types of public-private partnership
Under the current PPP regulations, the following seven principal public-private partnership structures are provided:
|BOT||Structure for the construction of infrastructure facility upon the completion of which the investor has the right to commercially operate such facility for a fixed term, and upon the expiry of such term, the investor transfers the facility to the state.*|
|Build–transfer–operate (BTO)||Structure for the construction of an infrastructure facility upon the completion of which the investor transfers such facility to the state and has the right to commercially operate the facility for a fixed term.†|
|BT||Structure for the construction of an infrastructure facility whereby the investor transfers such facility to the state and is rewarded by way of land use rights, working headquarters, infrastructure assets, or the right to commercially operate facilities or provide services to implement other projects to recover capital invested in such facility.‡|
|Build–own–operate (BOO)||Structure for the construction of an infrastructure facility upon the completion of which the investor owns and has the right to commercially operate the facility for a fixed term.§|
|Build–transfer–lease (BTL)||Structure for the construction of an infrastructure facility upon the completion of which the investor transfers such facility to the state and has the right to provide services on the basis of operating and exploiting the facility for a fixed term; and the state has the authority to hire such services and shall make payment to the investor periodically on the basis of the volume and quality of services.¶|
|Build–lease–transfer (BLT)||Structure for the construction of an infrastructure facility upon the completion of which the investor has the right to provide services on the basis of operating and exploiting such facility for a fixed term; the state has the right to hire such services and shall make payment to the investor periodically on the basis of the volume and quality of services; and upon the expiry of the term for provision of such services, the investor transfers the facility to the authorised state agency.#|
|Operate–manage (O&M)||Structure for an investor to commercially operate a facility partly or entirely for a fixed term.**|
|Mixed contract||Structure that is a mixture of two or more of the above types for the construction or operation of an infrastructure facility.††|
* Article 3.3 of Decree 63/2018/ND-CP.
† Article 3.4 of Decree 63/2018/ND-CP.
‡ Articles 3.5, 10.4, 15.3, 33, 34, 35 and 36 of Decree 63/2018/ND-CP.
§ Article 3.6 of Decree 63/2018/ND-CP.
¶ Articles 3.7 and 15.2 of Decree 63/2018/ND-CP.
# Articles 3.8 of Decree 63/2018/ND-CP.
** Article 3.9 of Decree 63/2018/ND-CP.
†† Article 3.10 of Decree 63/2018/ND-CP
BOT, BTO and BT are traditional structures in Vietnam. The difference between BOT and BTO is the timing of transfer of the project assets to the state. Once the project assets are transferred to the state, they are classified as 'public assets',12 which are subject to stricter control or management of the state. In that sense, BOT investors, under which the transfer will be made after the operation, may enjoy relatively more flexible control or management over the project assets than BTO investors. BT is recognised as a PPP structure in Vietnam, though no operational or management risk is passed to the private sector.
BOO, BTL, BLT and O&M structures were newly introduced by Decree 15/2015/ND-CP. BOO was implemented in practice even before being introduced by Decree 15/2015/ND-CP. BTL and BLT are new concepts introduced by Decree 15/2015/ND-CP. The elements that differentiate BTL and BLT from BOT or BTO structures are the payment method to the service of the investors and the payer to the service of investors (i.e., payment by the state on the basis of volume and quality of service including availability payment, not fees from end-users or off-takers).13
Decree 63 adopted all types of PPP structures under its predecessor regulation and newly introduced a new concept of mixed contract.
Bidding and award procedure
i Expressions of interest
Based on the approved feasibility study report for a PPP project, pre-qualification shall be conducted before preparing the plan for selection of investors to identify investors with sufficient capacity and experience to satisfy the project requirements and to invite them to participate in open bidding.20 Within three business days from the publication of the notice of invitation of pre-qualification applications on the national bidding network system or in the bidding newspaper, pre-qualification invitation documents must be issued.21 The application period is at least 30 days from the pre-qualification invitation.22 If investors wish to clarify pre-qualification invitation documents, they can send a written request to the inviting party until five business days prior to the bid closing date.23 Pre-qualification is conducted in accordance with the assessment criteria set out in the pre-qualification invitation documents.24 Investors will be required to prove financial-commercial capacity and ability to raise funds, implement the project and experience in similar projects, declare the preliminary method for implementing the project and commit to implementing it, and declare any dispute or litigation arising out of current or earlier contracts.25
ii Requests for proposals and unsolicited proposals
The selection of investors is basically made through international open bidding. Domestic open bidding is only allowed: where participation of foreign investors is restricted for the investment sectors by international treaties or laws of Vietnam; where foreign investors did not participate in or pass international pre-qualification; in Group C PPP projects; or in certain small-scale investment projects using land.26 Invitations to bid will be sent to the investors who passed pre-qualification.27 Bidding procedures for Group C PPP projects and projects using land are provided separately from bidding procedures for other PPP projects. By the bidding application closing date, bidders need to have provided bidding deposits, the amount of which is between 0.5 per cent and 1.5 per cent of the proposed total invested capital.28
Direct appointment of the investor (without bidding procedure) is allowed only in quite limited circumstances, that is, if:
- only one investor registers and satisfies the requirements set out in the pre-qualification invitation documents or only one investor passes the pre-qualification;
- only one investor has the capacity to implement the project because of intellectual property, commercial secrets, technology or arranging capital funding; or
- an investor proposing a PPP project (i.e., an investor of an unsolicited proposal project, which is further discussed below) satisfies the requirements for project implementation with the highest feasibility and efficiency, considering that:
- the investor has a feasibility study report that has been approved already;
- the service prices proposed by the investor, amounts of economic assistance by the government or social benefits are reasonable; and
- there is a necessity for national security.29
Unsolicited proposals of PPP projects from investors are possible in Vietnam. If the investor is a state-owned enterprise, it must form a consortium with another enterprise to propose the project. Under unsolicited projects, investors need to prepare the pre-feasibility report and the feasibility study report mentioned in the overall outline of the procedure for solicited PPP projects in Section V, by their own expenses.30 If the feasibility study report is approved, such investor is entitled to preferential treatment (5 per cent) in the financial–commercial assessment process of the bidding.31
iii Evaluation and grant
The evaluation process consists of an assessment of technical proposals and an assessment of commercial–financial proposals.32 Through these assessments, investors who satisfied the requirements will be ranked in the list. The investor ranked first will be invited to negotiate an investment (preliminary) agreement,33 which is not a PPP contract itself, but rather a preliminary agreement on the draft PPP contract. If preliminary negotiations are unsuccessful, the next ranking bidder will be invited to negotiate the same.34
Once the investment (preliminary) agreement is concluded, if necessary, the investor will proceed to the process of establishment of the project company in accordance with the general procedure provided by enterprises law.35 Under the new legal framework, the investor is no longer required to obtain an investment registration certificate for a PPP project.
After the project company is established, the investor may either sign the project contract then assign the rights and obligations of the investor under the project contract to the project company; or together with the project company to sign the project contract.36 Guarantee for contract performance must be provided prior to the date on which the PPP contract takes effect.37 An amount of a contract performance guarantee is stipulated in the bid invitation documents at a level between 1 per cent and 3 per cent of the total investment capital of the project.38
Procedures for Group C PPP projects and projects using land are provided separately from procedures for other PPP projects.
Payments by the state to the investors in PPP projects are one of the inevitable factors in the viability of such PPP projects. Under the old PPP regime, Decree 108/2009/ND-CP and Prime Minister Decision 71/2010/QD-TTg respectively provided the limits for available state investment capital of 49 per cent and 30 per cent of the total investment capital of a project. These limits were abolished under the current PPP regulations.
The state's participation in a PPP project may be made in one or more of the following forms ((a) and (b) will not be available for projects whose investors are selected by direct appointment):
- the state's capital contribution, which shall be used to support construction of facilities for the purpose of ensuring the viability of projects, excluding BT projects;
- capital for payment to the investor, which shall be used to make payment to investors providing services under BLT or BTL contracts;
- land fund, working headquarters or infrastructure assets as payment to the investor or the right to commercially operate and exploit the facility and the services assigned to the investor in a BT project; or
- capital for supporting construction of auxiliary works, and arranging compensation, site clearance and resettlement.39
State investment capital to be used to support construction of project facilities via viability gap funding will be disbursed in accordance with the procedure to disburse capital originating from the state budget.40 As a general principle, the payment will be made after certain volume or value of construction as agreed in the project contract has been completed in accordance with the ratio, value and progress, and other conditions agreed in the project contract.41
Under BTL and BLT contracts, the state will make payments to investors periodically as from the time of service provision as agreed in the project contract and on the basis of volume and quality of service (key performance indicators) as agreed in the project contract including availability payment.42 Availability payments or performance-based payments have been used in utilities PPP projects (power generation and water supply projects) in Vietnam, and recently, a newly introduced BTL/BLT contract form was actually used.43
A BT contract is a unique type of PPP contract under which the investor will be rewarded by way of land use rights (not payment by cash) in order to implement other projects to recover capital invested in the facility.
ii State guarantees
Government guarantees on loans
The guideline for government guarantees on loans is available under Law No. 83/2015/QH13 on State Budget, Law No. 20/2017/QH14 on Public Debt Management and Decree No. 91/2018/ND-CP on the issuance and management of government guarantee. For debts of investors or project companies to be guaranteed by the government, they need to obtain the in-principle approval from the Prime Minister.44 According to the Ministry of Finance, the total guaranteed amount as of the end of 2018 is equivalent to US$27.7 billion. Government guarantees issued to foreign loans accounted for more than 85 per cent of the guaranteed amount. GGU issued to power projects accounts for more than 62 per cent of the total guaranteed amount.45
Government guarantees on other obligations
Decree 63/2018/ND-CP also provides government guarantees on provision of raw materials, on consumption of products and services, and on other contractual obligations to the investor, project company or other enterprises participating in project implementation, and a guarantee for performance by state-owned enterprises of the obligation to sell fuel and raw materials to, and to purchase products and services from, the investor and project company.46 For example, government guarantees were provided for the contractual obligations of EVN (off-taker) in power plant projects and of the providers of water pipes in water plant projects. For these types of guarantees, the Prime Minister's decision to appoint the guarantor is also necessary.47 However, it has not seemed to be easy to obtain these guarantees recently. In addition, if the local level people's committee is a provider of the guarantee and does not have enough budget to implement such guarantee obligations, investors need to request necessary arrangements to secure the required budget for the local authorities to implement such a guarantee obligation.
Guarantee on foreign currency balancing (availability)
The Vietnamese dong is not traded in the international market and no commercial bank will be able to sell United States dollars, even in Vietnam, if the bank's rate is outside the range of rate decided by the State Bank of Vietnam because of Vietnamese foreign exchange regulations.48 As a result, there is a risk that conversion from Vietnamese dong to hard currencies becomes impossible, and this risk became a reality in 2008. Government guarantee on the foreign currency balancing (availability) is a critical issue for foreign-invested PPP projects under which the income of the projects are denominated in Vietnamese dong, such as power plant projects, water plant projects and toll fee road projects.
Article 64 of Decree 63/2018/ND-CP provides guidelines for such government guarantees on foreign currency balancing. Investors and project companies of the following project may be considered to be granted a government guarantee on foreign currency balancing (availability):
- projects that fall under the authority of the National Assembly or the Prime Minister to approve the investment policies; and
- projects for development of important infrastructures.
The Vietnamese government does not have enough foreign currency reserves (though the situation has been improving recently), so the procurement of this type of guarantee is not easy, as illustrated above.
Decree 63/2018/ND-CP also provides for other types of government guarantees that include a guarantee on the purpose of land use right for the project being unchanged even if the lenders exercise their step-in rights (Article 63), a guarantee on the priority provision of public service (Article 65) and a guarantee on protection from confiscation of project assets (Article 66). Foreign investors of PPP projects in Vietnam have tried to obtain GGU even for the types of guarantees not clearly provided in the PPP regulations. Such guarantees include on the overseas fund transfer, permission of overseas bank account opening and of protection from the change of laws.
iii Distribution of risk
Risk allocation is a mandatory item to be provided in pre-feasibility study reports and feasibility study reports.49 In Vietnam, there is no official standard or reference risk allocation template, and risk allocation needs to be negotiated with the authorised state agency case by case. This negotiation takes quite long time and foreign investors often encounter difficulties.
iv Adjustment and revision
PPP project contracts may be amended or supplemented as a result of a change of project size, technical specifications of the facility or the total investment capital already agreed; a force majeure event; an amendment of the feasibility study report; or other circumstances as stipulated in the project contract.50 In practice, several terms of BOT projects were extended to make up for deficiencies caused because of the changes in the situation expected at the stage of project proposal and feasibility study.51
v Ownership of underlying assets
The provincial people's committee is responsible for site clearance and for completing procedures for allocation or lease of land to implement the project.52 Site clearance and resettlement in Vietnam often face difficulties and cause delays in implementation of PPP projects.
If a project involves transfer of a project facility, the authorised state agency and the investor shall reach agreement in the project contract on the conditions and procedures for such transfer, in accordance with the following principles:
- the investor notifies the authorised state agency about the transfer of the project facility one year before the date of transfer or within such other period as agreed in the project contract;
- the authorised state agency arranges verification of the quality, value and status of the project facility;
- the investor and project company ensure the discharge of any financial or other obligation of project facility, undertakings of necessary repairs, maintenance and overhaul, and others, in accordance with the project contract; and
- the authorised state agency organises management and operation of the facility after it is handed over.
The transfer is only permissible upon the completion of construction works or commencement of the operation of such projects.53
The investor and project company are permitted to mortgage assets and land use rights in the project and the right to commercially operate the project facility with the lender.54 However, only credit institutions authorised to operate in Vietnam are eligible for taking mortgage on the land use rights, and foreign financial institutions are not qualified to do so.55
vi Early termination
Early termination of PPP project contracts may happen as a result of breach of contract without taking effective remedial measures, a force majeure event or in other circumstances stipulated in the project contract. In practice, if a project turns out to be commercially not feasible, solutions through revision of contract term, as mentioned above, or taking over by governmental institutions are sought.56
There are international and domestic banks (including BIDV, Vietcombank and Vietinbank) that have capacity to finance PPP projects in Vietnam. In certain sectors, banks (especially international banks) are facing bankability issues caused by various reasons including foreign exchange-related issues and lack of appropriate risk allocation.
In Vietnam, both international and domestic arbitrations are allowed as dispute resolution methods in PPP projects. According to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's website,57 eight investment disputes have been reported with Vietnam as respondent state, four of which were decided in favour of the state (the latest case is RECOFI v. Vietnam, whose decision was finalised in 2016).58 Vietnam is a party to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the New York Convention) and foreign arbitration awards should be recognised and enforceable in accordance with the rules thereof. In practice, however, recognition and enforcement were often unreasonably denied by Vietnamese courts because of reasons of inconsistency with the basic principle of law of Vietnam or that the dispute is not a commercial one covered by the New York Convention. Domestic arbitration is also growing rapidly and increasingly recognised and utilised in Vietnam.
As mentioned above, a new PPP Law is scheduled to be approved in late 2020. Currently, it is not certain how Vietnam will tackle the issues caused by its limited state budget, including the unavailability of appropriate GGUs, but we hope several positive changes that are somehow implied in the publicised drafts will be included in the new regulations.
One of the desired changes is the facilitation of brownfield investments. Even if foreign investors have difficulties in forming greenfield PPP projects as a result of limited provision of GGUs, etc., they may take risks of such projects after local investors, especially major SOEs, take the development risks of such projects. Local investors can also benefit from brownfield investments by collecting funds earlier than originally scheduled. We hope the new regulations will clarify the procedures and conditions for brownfield investments that are not clear enough under the current regulations and facilitate brownfield investments.
Another change is the enhancement of existing funds or establishment of new funds specifically reserved for supporting PPP projects so as to cover a shortage of state budget and to attract investors' private investment capital source. However, the inclusion of such change in the publicised drafts appears not to have been strongly supported because the establishment of new funds would possibly cause a conflict with the Law on State Budget. To have this change approved, it may become necessary to consider the amendment to the Law on State Budget as well.
Although many challenges still exist relating to PPP projects in Vietnam, there is no doubt that there is a huge demand for them.
1 Kazuhide Ohya and Vu Le Bang are partners and Nguyen Van Trang is a foreign attorney at Nishimura & Asahi.
2 Report No. 25/BC-CP dated 30 January 2019 of the Vietnamese government.
3 Ngoc Oanh, Binh Anh Water Corporation Limited: Always Supplying High Quality Potable Water, Vietnam Business Forum Magazine (undated), available at http://vccinews.com/news_detail.asp?news_id=4226 (accessed on 6 February 2019).
4 For example, Huynh Tan Phat Road Project originally developed by Vietnam Urban and Industrial Zone Development Investment Corporation and Ong Thin Bridge Project originally planned to be developed by Civil Engineering and Construction Company 5 as BOT projects did not become profitable and were eventually transferred to public sectors.
5 See Paragraph 39, p. 11 of the 'Report on the Working Party on the Accession of Vietnam'.
6 See http://quochoi.vn/tintuc/Pages/tin-hoat-dong-cua-quoc-hoi.aspx?ItemID=42978 (accessed on 9 December 2019).
7 Resolution No. 78/2019/QH14 dated 11 June 2016 of the National Assembly promulgating legislation schedule for 2020.
8 Decision No. 631/QD-TTg dated 29 April 2014 of the Prime Minister promulgating the list of national projects in which foreign investments are called for by 2020 (including by PPP). The following links are for the projects calling for PPP investment: http://ppp.mt.gov.vn/pppunit/Projects; http://ppp.mpi.gov.vn/Pages/project.aspx.
10 Projects for thermal power plants enjoy certain preferential treatments, including GGU, under Decision 2414/QD-TTg dated 11 December 2013. In these projects, participation of foreign investors who are capable of implementing such projects is necessary because of the lack of capacity and experience of domestic investors for such projects.
11 See http://vneconomy.vn/vay-von-bao-lanh-chinh-phu-da-len-toi-277-ty-usd-20190803170610124.htm (accessed on 9 December 2019).
12 Article 3.1 of the Law on Management and Utilisation of Public Asset.
13 However, various payment arrangements were made under BOT/BTO projects in the past.
14 Article 20 of Decree 63/2018/ND-CP.
15 BT projects, Group C PPP projects and high-tech projects follow different procedures. Group C PPP projects are not required to formulate and evaluate a pre-feasibility study report or to issue an investment policy decision, but the project must be announced after the feasibility study report is approved. The selection of investors of high-tech projects will be conducted after the pre-feasibility study report and project approval. As a result, the selected investors will be responsible for preparing the feasibility study report.
16 Article 9 of Decree 63/2018/ND-CP.
17 Article 21.1 of Decree 63/2018/ND-CP.
18 Article 30.1 of Decree 63/2018/ND-CP.
19 Article 31.1 of Decree 63/2018/ND-CP.
20 Article 16 of Decree 30/2015/ND-CP. Certain small projects may be exempted from this process.
21 Article 6.3 of Decree 30/2015/ND-CP.
22 Article 6.4 of Decree 30/2015/ND-CP.
23 Article 18.2(c) of Decree 30/2015/ND-CP.
24 Articles 17.1(d) and 20.1 of Decree 30/2015/ND-CP.
25 Articles 17.1(c) and 20.1 of Decree 30/2015/ND-CP.
26 Article 9 of Decree 30/2015/ND-CP.
27 Article 29 of Decree 30/2015/ND-CP.
28 Articles 11.2 and 11.3(b) of the Law on Bidding.
29 Article 22.4 of the Law on Bidding and Article 9.3 (c) of Decree 30/2015/ND-CP. Another possible situation for direct appointment is a special case pursuant to a decision of the Prime Minister (Article 26 of the Law on Bidding).
30 Even under the solicited projects, these expenses will eventually be borne by investors, so there is no substantial difference between the solicited and unsolicited projects in this regard. However, investors need to provide in the project proposal the treatment of such expenses if investors are not selected to implement the project as a result of bidding.
31 Article 3 of 30/2015/ND-CP.
32 Article 27 and Article 36 of Decree 30/2015/ND-CP.
33 Article 40.4 of Decree 30/2015/ND-CP.
34 Article 40.6 of Decree 30/2015/ND-CP.
35 Article 38.1 of Decree 63/2018/ND-CP.
36 Article 39 of Decree 63/2018/ND-CP.
37 Article 72 of the Law on Bidding and Article 47 of Decree 63/2018/ND-CP.
38 Article 72.2 of the Law on Bidding.
39 Article 11 of Decree 63/2018/ND-CP.
40 Article 17.1 of Circular 88/2018/TT-BTC.
41 Article 17.2 of Circular 88/2018/TT-BTC.
42 Article 18.1 of Circular 88/2018/TT-BTC.
43 See http://www.ipc.danang.gov.vn/vi/chi-tiet-tin-tuc?dinhdanh=1403601&cat=0; http://baodauthau.vn/dau-tu/an-giang-dau-tu-du-an-xu-ly-chat-thai-ran-theo-hinh-thuc-blt-46266.html; http://kehoachtaichinh.medinet.gov.vn/xa-hoi-hoa/cac-du-an-dau-tu-theo-hinh-thuc-doi-tac-cong-tu-ppp-cua-cac-benh-vien-thanh-
44 Article 13 of Decree 91/2018/ND-CP.
46 Article 61 of Decree 63/2018/ND-CP.
48 Article 5 of Circular 15/2015/TT-NHNN.
49 Article 18.3 and Article 29.1 of Decree 63/2018/ND-CP.
50 Article 44 of Decree 63/2018/ND-CP.
51 e.g., Rach Mieu Bridge (https://tuoitre.vn/du-an-bot-xay-dung-cau-duong-thang-it-thua-nhieu-168513.htm).
52 Article 49 of Decree 63/2018/ND-CP.
53 Article 43.1 of Decree 63/2018/ND-CP.
54 Article 62 of Decree 63/2018/ND-CP.
55 Articles 174 and 175 of the Law on Land. It is not clear whether foreign bank branches in Vietnam are included in 'credit institutions authorised to operate in Vietnam' or not. At this point in time, opinions of the state authorities are not necessarily unified.
56 e.g., Huynh Tan Phat road project mentioned in footnote 4.
57 Available at https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-dispute-settlement/country/229/viet-nam (accessed on 11 December 2019). This website provides information on investment disputes and does not focus on PPP projects.
58 Available at https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-dispute-settlement/cases/554/recofi-v-viet-nam (accessed on 11 December 2019).