The New Zealand banking environment is characterised by a high level of ownership by foreign banks. Of the 24 banks currently registered in New Zealand, nine operate as branches of overseas-incorporated banks. Of the 15 New Zealand incorporated banks, 10 are foreign owned. Australian ownership is dominant, with the four major retail banks having the greatest market share (that is, the assets of each bank as a proportion of the total assets of the banking system) being ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited, ASB Bank Limited, Bank of New Zealand and Westpac New Zealand Limited, all operated by New Zealand subsidiaries of Australian banks.
II THE REGULATORY REGIME APPLICABLE TO BANKS
New Zealand has a ‘twin-peaks’ approach to the regulation of the financial system. The Reserve Bank of New Zealand has responsibility for prudential regulation of financial institutions (including banks). The Financial Markets Authority (FMA) has responsibility for the regulation of financial products (including securities and derivatives issued by financial institutions regulated by the Reserve Bank). NZX Limited operates the principal securities exchange in New Zealand, and also regulates issuers and securities listed on its markets.
In New Zealand, banks are regulated in the following ways:
- a if an entity wishes to use the words ‘bank’, ‘banker’ and ‘banking’ in its name, title or (in some situations) advertisements, the entity must be registered by the Reserve Bank under the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act 1989 (RBNZ Act) and will be subject to ongoing prudential supervision by the Reserve Bank. Importantly, an entity is not required to be registered solely because it carries on banking activities; and
- b a bank will be regulated in relation to the activities that it undertakes and the services that it provides. The provision of particular services may be subject to specific regulation, particularly where services are provided to consumers. For example, issuing financial products (including securities and derivatives), providing financial adviser services to retail investors and providing credit to consumers are all subject to prescriptive regulatory regimes. The activities carried on by banks also make them subject to more general laws, such as anti-money laundering laws and laws countering the financing of terrorism, privacy laws and general fair trading laws.
The Reserve Bank does not register and supervise banks for the purpose of depositor protection. Registration and prudential supervision powers are conferred on the Reserve Bank under the RBNZ Act for the purposes of promoting the maintenance of a sound and efficient financial system and avoiding significant damage to the financial system that could result from the failure of a registered bank. Accordingly, when considering an application for registration, the Reserve Bank is concerned that only financial institutions of appropriate standing and repute that will be able to comply with the prudential requirements imposed on them are able to become registered banks. In particular, the RBNZ Act requires the Reserve Bank to have regard to:
- a the incorporation and ownership structure of the applicant;
- b the size and nature of the applicant’s business or proposed business, or any part of the applicant’s business or proposed business;
- c the ability of the applicant to carry on its business or proposed business in a prudent manner;
- d the standing of the applicant in the financial markets;
- e the suitability of the directors and senior managers of the applicant for their respective positions;
- f the standing of the owner of the applicant in the financial markets; and
- g any other matters that may be prescribed in regulations.
If the application is by an overseas person or a subsidiary of an overseas person, the RBNZ Act also requires the Reserve Bank to have regard to:
- a the law and regulatory requirements of the applicant’s home jurisdiction that relate to:
• the disclosure by the applicant of financial and other information of the kind that a registered bank must disclose under the RBNZ Act;
• the accounting and auditing standards applicable to the applicant;
• the duties and powers of the directors of the applicant;
• the licensing, registration, authorisation and supervision of the applicant; and
• in the case of an application from an overseas person only, the recognition and priorities of claims of creditors or classes of creditors in the event of the insolvency of the applicant; and
- b the nature and extent of the financial and other information disclosed to the public by the applicant.
Registered banks currently operate in New Zealand as New Zealand-incorporated companies (often as subsidiaries of non-New Zealand banks or, in the case of The Co-operative Bank Limited, as a New Zealand-incorporated cooperative company) and as branches of non-New Zealand banks. Although the Reserve Bank must have regard to the ownership and incorporation structure of an applicant for registration, the Reserve Bank does not ordinarily prescribe the legal form that the bank must take. Rather, the Reserve Bank is concerned with ensuring that the owners are incentivised to monitor the bank’s activities closely, and to influence its behaviour in a way that will maintain or improve the bank’s soundness, but that still retains sufficient separation between the board and its owners to ensure that, where the interests of the bank and its owners diverge, the directors of the bank act in the best interests of the bank.
In certain circumstances, however, the Reserve Bank will require a bank to operate through a New Zealand-incorporated company rather than a branch of an overseas bank. Those circumstances are where the bank is systemically important to New Zealand’s economy, where the bank is proposing to take retail deposits in New Zealand and there is depositor protection in the bank’s home jurisdiction, or where the Reserve Bank considers that the disclosure or supervisory requirements in the bank’s home jurisdiction are inadequate.
The Reserve Bank itself is a statutory corporation, and it performs a number of roles in the New Zealand financial system in addition to the registration and prudential supervision of banks. The Reserve Bank:
- a formulates and implements monetary policy (this is its primary statutory purpose);
- b operates as the central bank of New Zealand and issues New Zealand currency;
- c has oversight of certain payment and settlement systems;
- d is the prudential regulator of non-bank deposit takers under the Non-Bank Deposit Takers Act 2013, including responsibility for granting licences to non-bank deposit takers;
- e has an increasing role in the prudential regulation of licensed insurers under the Insurance (Prudential Supervision) Act 2010;
- f is responsible for supervising banks, life insurers and non-bank deposit takers under the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009; and
- g operates high-value payment and settlement and clearing systems.
The New Zealand banking sector withstood the global financial crisis well. No emergency funding was requested from or provided by the government, and no New Zealand banks failed as a result of the crisis. All guarantees provided to banks by the government were removed by the end of 2010. However, as part of a focus on reducing risks to the financial system following the global financial crisis, the Reserve Bank has developed a policy approach known as the ‘macro-prudential policy’. The macroprudential policy aims to promote greater stability in the financial system by building additional resilience in the financial system during periods of rapid credit growth and rising leverage or abundant liquidity, and dampening excessive growth in credit and asset prices.
In May 2013, the Minister of Finance and the Governor of the Reserve Bank signed a memorandum of understanding on the macroprudential policy, outlining the governance arrangements for the use of macroprudential ‘tools’ to manage the system-wide risks that can develop during boom-bust financial cycles. Those tools include the ability to require banks to hold additional buffer regulatory capital, to limit high loan-to-value residential (LVR) mortgage lending by banks, or both.
The Reserve Bank maintains relationships with other banking and financial system regulators, particularly in Australia. The Trans-Tasman Council on Banking Supervision (TTC), comprising representatives of the Australian and New Zealand Treasuries, the Reserve Banks of Australia and New Zealand and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), was formed in February 2005 to support the development of a single trans-Tasman economic market in banking services. In particular, the TTC is mandated to develop and promote measures that enhance trans-Tasman policy harmonisation, mutual recognition, information sharing and cooperation. The TTC’s work resulted in the passing of legislation in New Zealand and Australia in 2006 requiring the Reserve Bank and APRA, when exercising their prudential regulation powers, to support each other in meeting their statutory responsibilities relating to prudential regulation and financial system stability and, where reasonably practicable, to avoid actions likely to have a detrimental effect on the financial system stability of the other country. In 2010, the members of the TTC signed a memorandum of cooperation setting out high-level principles that the members will have regard to when dealing with trans-Tasman banking groups facing financial distress.
III PRUDENTIAL REGULATION
i Relationship with the prudential regulator
The Reserve Bank’s approach to bank supervision is based on three pillars: self-discipline, market discipline and regulatory discipline.2
The self discipline pillar involves the Reserve Bank creating incentives for banks to maintain the systems and capacity to identify, measure, monitor and control their risks and maintain prudent operations. This is achieved by:
- a requiring high-quality, regular and timely financial public disclosure by banks in the form of quarterly disclosure statements;
- b requiring directors to sign attestations in their bank’s public disclosure statements;
- c not creating an impression that the Reserve Bank (rather than the banks themselves) has primary responsibility for the prudent management of banking risks; and
- d the Reserve Bank avoiding explicit or implicit government support for banks. While this goal was (at least partly) undermined by the introduction of wholesale and retail guarantee schemes by the government in 2008, both schemes were terminated by the end of 2010.
The market discipline pillar attempts to use market forces to reinforce the incentives for the prudent management of banks. This second pillar is based on the premise that an efficient and well-informed market will reward well-run banks, for example through lower funding costs and better access to funding. This is principally achieved by the Reserve Bank maintaining a contestable and competitive banking system, and ensuring the market is well informed about a bank’s financial performance and condition. Again, this goal was distorted by the introduction of the government’s wholesale and retail guarantee schemes in the period following the global financial crisis, but the removal of those schemes is restoring the Reserve Bank’s preferred position.
The regulatory discipline pillar involves the Reserve Bank using regulatory and supervisory tools to reinforce incentives for banks to manage their risks prudently. The Reserve Bank has deliberately sought to keep its regulatory interventions to a minimum.
The Reserve Bank monitors all banks on an ongoing basis. Monitoring occurs principally through the banks’ quarterly disclosure statements. The RBNZ Act provides the Reserve Bank with extensive powers to obtain additional information, to have that information audited if required and to have a bank’s affairs investigated.
The Reserve Bank meets with the board of directors of the larger banks on a regular basis. The Reserve Bank does not conduct on-site examinations of banks in its capacity as prudential regulator of banks.
ii Management of banks
When considering an application for registration as a bank, the Reserve Bank will consider the suitability for their positions of the directors and senior managers of the bank. This policy applies in the case of locally incorporated applicants, to existing or proposed directors, the existing or proposed chief executive officer (CEO), and existing or proposed executives who report directly to the CEO; and in the case of overseas incorporated applicants, to existing directors and the existing or proposed chief executive of the New Zealand operations.
If a proposed director or senior manager has already passed a foreign banking regulator’s suitability assessment, the Reserve Bank will usually accept that assessment as evidence of suitability.
A locally incorporated bank will be required to maintain adequate separation between the bank and its owners. This will require:
- a putting in place policies to monitor and limit exposures to related parties;
- b the company having a constitution that does not permit the directors to act in the interests of its holding company;
- c the size and composition of the board being such that it does not give rise to concerns about the bank’s ability to pursue its own interests when those interests conflict with those of its shareholders; and
- d the bank having an audit committee (or other committee whose mandate includes audit matters) comprising non-executive and otherwise independent directors.
The Reserve Bank generally will require a locally incorporated bank to have at least five directors. The majority of the directors must be non-executive, and at least half are required to be independent. At least half of those independent directors must be ordinarily resident in New Zealand. The chairperson must also be independent. The Reserve Bank’s criteria for a director to be ‘independent’ are set out in the Reserve Bank’s Corporate Governance (BS14) document.
The Reserve Bank must be supplied with a copy of the curriculum vitae of any potential director, CEO or executive who reports to the CEO of a locally incorporated bank, and the appointment of such a director, CEO or executive can only be made if the Reserve Bank has advised that it has no objection to the appointment.
Directors of banks (and the New Zealand CEO of an overseas bank) are required to sign bank disclosure statements (published quarterly) that include certain attestations by the directors. Attestations include that the directors believe, after due enquiry by them, that:
- a the bank has systems in place to monitor and adequately control the banking group’s material risks, including credit risk, concentration of credit risk, interest rate risk, currency risk, equity risk, liquidity risk and other business risks, and that those systems are being properly applied;
- b exposures to connected persons have not been contrary to the interests of the banking group (this applies to locally incorporated banks only); and
- c the bank has been complying with its conditions of registration.
In the full-year disclosure statements, banks must also disclose the following (and address any changes to the composition of the bank’s board in the half-year and ‘off-quarter’ disclosure statements):
- a details of each director (including name, occupation, technical or professional qualifications, whether they are executive or independent, other directorships and any details of transactions that could materially influence the director in carrying out his or her duties); this information must also be disclosed in respect of the New Zealand CEO of an overseas bank;
- b whether there is a board audit committee (locally incorporated banks are required to have an audit committee or other committee that considers audit matters), and certain details of that committee; and
- c the board’s policy for avoiding or handling conflicts of interest that may arise from directors’ personal, professional or business interests.
Banks whose New Zealand liabilities, net of amounts due to related parties, exceed NZ$10 billion, must comply with the Reserve Bank’s Outsourcing Policy (BS11). This will include satisfying the Reserve Bank that:
- a the business and affairs of the bank are managed by, or are under the direction or supervision of, the board of the bank;
- b the employment contract of the CEO or person in an equivalent position with the bank, and the terms and conditions of the employment contract are determined by, and any decisions relating to the employment or termination of employment of the person are made by, the board of the bank; and
- c all staff employed by the bank have their remuneration determined by the board or the CEO of the bank, and are accountable (directly or indirectly) to the CEO of the bank.
No restrictions have been imposed by the Reserve Bank on bonus payments to management and employees of banks.
iii Regulatory capital and liquidity
A bank’s capital requirements must be calculated under one of two approaches available under the Reserve Bank’s capital adequacy framework. The first is the standardised approach and is set out in the Reserve Bank’s Capital Adequacy Framework (Standardised Approach) (BS2A). This approach uses external credit assessments produced by approved credit rating agencies and is the default approach. The second permits a bank that has been accredited by the Reserve Bank to use its internal models to measure the risks of the bank’s business and is set out in Capital Adequacy Framework (Internal Models Approach) (BS2B). The Reserve Bank’s capital adequacy framework aligns with the Basel III global standards in almost all areas, but some departures were made to reflect New Zealand’s circumstances. For example, the Reserve Bank did not support the introduction of a leverage ratio for New Zealand banks, relying instead on its liquidity policy (which is discussed below).
The Reserve Bank implemented the Basel III capital requirements in stages. Transitional relief for regulatory instruments that no longer meet the applicable criteria for recognition as Tier 1 or Tier 2 capital is in its final year. A maximum of 20 per cent of the amount of those instruments can now be included as regulatory capital, and that amount will reduce to zero on 1 January 2018.
A bank must have a capital policy. The capital policy must take into account any constraints on the bank’s access to further capital, for instance if required in relation to an increase in business or an unexpected loss. In addition, a bank must satisfy the Reserve Bank that it has the capacity to implement and manage an internal capital adequacy assessment process that meets the Reserve Bank’s Guidelines on a Bank’s Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (BS12).
A branch of a bank incorporated overseas will have to demonstrate to the Reserve Bank that the global bank complies with adequate capital standards that are at least broadly comparable with those in New Zealand, and that it is subject to adequate supervision by the bank’s home supervisor.
Minimum levels of capital must be held on both a solo and group basis. Capital is divided into common equity Tier 1 capital, additional Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital, consistent with Basel III. Locally incorporated banks generally need to comply with the following capital requirements:
- a the total capital ratio of the banking group is at least 8 per cent;
- b the Tier I capital ratio of the banking group is at least 6 per cent;
- c the common equity Tier 1 capital ratio is at least 4.5 per cent; and
- d the capital of the banking group is at least NZ$30 million.
From 1 January 2014, most locally incorporated banks were required to maintain a conservation buffer of 2.5 per cent above the minimum ratios or face restrictions on distributions. The Reserve Bank also has the discretion to apply a countercyclical buffer of common equity of between zero and 2.5 per cent, although there is no formal upper limit. The countercyclical buffer will operate as an extension of the conservation buffer when in effect, the purpose being to protect the financial system during the downturns that follow periods of excessive credit growth.
Capital ratios are calculated by reference to risk-weighted on and off-balance sheet credit exposures, a capital charge for market risk exposures and a capital requirement for operational risk. Locally incorporated banks must obtain a notice of non-objection before treating a capital instrument as regulatory capital, and must receive approval for certain repayments of instruments.
Since 1 April 2010, banks have been required to comply with the Reserve Bank’s Liquidity Policy (BS13). The Liquidity Policy requires banks to meet a minimum core-funding ratio of 75 per cent, ensuring that a greater proportion of bank funding is met through retail deposits and term wholesale funding. This has led to increased competition among banks and non-bank deposit takers for retail deposits. Basel III proposes a leverage ratio, which the Reserve Bank considers very similar to the intent of BS13. The Reserve Bank considers, however, that certain aspects of the new leverage standards are not suitable for adoption in New Zealand. For example, the requirement that government securities comprise the bulk of high-quality liquid assets held by banks is not suitable because New Zealand does not have a sufficient volume of government debt on issue.
iv Recovery and resolution
In June 2013, the Reserve Bank released the Open Bank Resolution (OBR) Pre-positioning Requirements Policy (BS17). The OBR policy applies to locally incorporated banks holding retail deposits in excess of NZ$1 billion (although other registered banks may opt in). The OBR is a tool for responding to a bank failure, allowing the bank to be open for full-scale or limited business on the next business day after being placed under statutory management. It is intended to provide an immediate and practical tool for responding to a bank failure and to reduce the moral hazard associated with implicit government support of banks (those that are ‘too big to fail’).
The OBR policy places the cost of a failure in the first instance on shareholders, but also provides flexibility to assign losses to creditors without causing unnecessary disruption to the banking system and wider economy. If a statutory manager is appointed to a bank, the bank must close and all accounts must be frozen to enable the bank’s net asset deficiency to be determined. A haircut reflecting the bank’s net asset deficiency plus a buffer is applied to all creditors’ accounts, and funds equal to the amount of the haircut are frozen. The non-frozen funds are guaranteed by the government, and the bank is able to reopen for core transactions business. On the following day, haircuts are applied to other non-time sensitive liabilities to enable those liabilities to also be partially satisfied. If sufficient funds become available, the frozen funds can be released in the course of the statutory management.
Banks subject to the OBR policy must pre-position for OBR; this means having the IT, payments, resource and process functionality in place ahead of a crisis so that, if a statutory manager is appointed, access channels can be closed, funds can be frozen and access channels can be reopened for business by no later than 9am the next business day.
IV CONDUCT OF BUSINESS
The rules governing New Zealand banks’ conduct of business are found in a range of statutes. These include the following:
- a Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013: this Act regulates how financial products are created, promoted and sold, and the ongoing responsibilities of those who offer, deal and trade in them. The Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 regulates registered banks in the following ways:
• fair dealing: the Act sets out core standards of behaviour that those operating in the financial markets must comply with. It imposes fair dealing requirements on persons acting in trade in relation to financial products and financial services by prohibiting misleading or deceptive conduct, and prohibiting false, misleading or unsubstantiated representations about certain matters relating to financial products and financial services or in connection with dealings in, or the supply or promotion of, those products or services;
• disclosure of offers of financial products: the Act replaced the previous requirement for issuers to prepare a prospectus and investment statement with a requirement to prepare a product disclosure statement and a register entry tailored to retail investors for ‘regulated offers’. There are a number of exclusions from offers being ‘regulated offers’ that are available to registered banks, including for certain simple debt products. The disclosure regime also expressly applies to certain offers of derivatives;
• licensing of market services: the Act requires providers of certain market services to be licensed. Any person acting as a derivatives issuer in respect of a regulated offer of derivatives must apply for a licence from the FMA; and
• financial reporting: the Act sets out financial reporting requirements, including for registered banks, which include keeping proper accounting records and lodging audited financial statements on a public register;
- b Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003: this Act principally regulates the provision of credit products to consumers. It prescribes a disclosure regime and regulates specific aspects of consumer credit products, such as prohibiting the charging of unreasonable credit fees. It also requires lenders to comply with responsible lending principles in relation to their consumer lending;
- c Financial Advisers Act 2008: this Act regulates financial advisers and brokers. The regime requires registration and authorisation of financial advisers and brokers (there are different levels of authorisation depending on the types of products advised on and the types of services provided), and imposes disclosure and conduct obligations. The Act is currently under review by the government. There is ongoing consultation with consumers and the industry. An exposure draft of amending legislation was released in early 2017;
- d Financial Service Providers (Registration and Dispute Resolution) Act 2008: this Act creates a register of entities that provide financial services. New Zealand banks are required to register as financial service providers and be members of an approved dispute resolution scheme in respect of services provided to retail customers. The Act is also being reviewed in conjunction with the Financial Advisers Act;
- e Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Financing of Terrorism Act 2009: this Act places obligations on ‘reporting entities’ (including financial institutions) to detect and deter money laundering and the financing of terrorism. Under this regime, ‘reporting entities’ (including registered banks) must:
• assess the money-laundering and terrorism-financing risks they may reasonably expect to face;
• implement a compliance programme to detect, manage and mitigate those risks;
• carry out appropriate customer due diligence;
• report suspicious transactions; and
• maintain robust record keeping.
- The compliance of banks, life insurers and non-bank deposit takers under the regime is supervised by the Reserve Bank. The key tools used by the Reserve Bank to monitor compliance are on-site inspections, desk-based reviews and thematic surveys;
- f Privacy Act 1993: this Act regulates the collection, retention, use and disclosure of personal information relating to individuals; and
- g Fair Trading Act 1986: this Act prohibits misleading or deceptive conduct in trade. Conduct in trade includes the marketing and sale of any financial products or services. New provisions effectively prohibiting the inclusion of unfair contract terms in standard form contracts came into force in March 2015.
With the exception of the Privacy Act (which sets out a complaints procedure), each of these statutes includes a comprehensive enforcement regime. In most cases, if a bank is in breach of the relevant act, both the bank and its directors (and often others) are subject to both civil and criminal liability provisions.
In addition to the statutory rules, registered banks are subject to certain common law rules, such as the banker’s duty of confidentiality (which, unlike the Privacy Act, is not limited to individuals).
The macroprudential tools available to the Reserve Bank also include the ability to impose temporary restrictions on high LVR mortgage lending. Various restrictions on high LVR lending have applied since 1 October 2013, with restrictions tightening from 1 October 2016.
Registered banks have the opportunity for self-regulation through membership of the New Zealand Bankers’ Association (NZBA). The NZBA is a forum for member banks to work together on a cooperative basis. One of the NZBA’s key contributions to self-regulation of the New Zealand banking industry has been its development of the Code of Banking Practice, which sets out minimum standards of good banking practices for member banks. Membership is open to any New Zealand-registered bank. Currently, 16 banks are members of the NZBA.
Banks may also elect to participate in the Banking Ombudsman scheme, which is a free and independent dispute resolution service established to assist people in resolving complaints made against participating banks. The Banking Ombudsman is an approved dispute resolution scheme for the purposes of the Financial Services Providers Act.
The primary purpose of the Banking Ombudsman is to review and recommend ways to resolve disputes that remain unresolved after consideration by a participating bank’s internal complaints procedures. Where appropriate, the Banking Ombudsman may also refer complaints to other organisations such as the Insurance and Savings Ombudsman, the Privacy Commissioner or the Human Rights Commissioner.
Banks typically fund their activities through retail term deposits and the offshore wholesale markets.
During the global financial crisis, certain facilities were made available to banks, including opt-in deposit schemes under which the government guaranteed certain bank debts and the Reserve Bank extending its liquidity facilities. These facilities have all now been cancelled.
An amendment to the RBNZ Act that came into force in December 2013 created a formal regulatory framework to support the issuance of covered bonds by New Zealand banks. Under this regime, banks may only issue covered bonds under a covered bond programme that has been registered with the Reserve Bank. A programme can only be registered if it meets certain requirements, including that the cover pool assets are held by a special purpose vehicle that meets the specified requirements; a cover pool monitor has been appointed to monitor the programme; and the programme documentation meets certain requirements (e.g., administrative requirements in relation to the cover pool assets and testing to ensure sufficient assets are held in the cover pool).
The amendments to the RBNZ Act address previous legal uncertainty associated with the effect on the covered bond guarantor and the cover pool assets if a statutory manager is appointed to the bank. They also provide greater transparency of covered bond issuance and minimum standards of monitoring.
The Reserve Bank also limits the amount of covered bonds a bank may issue via the bank’s conditions of registration. The Reserve Bank considers a limit to be necessary to balance the benefits of covered bond issuance against the potential adverse impact on unsecured creditors. The limit is currently set at 10 per cent of a bank’s total assets.
The amount of funding that can be provided by Australian-owned parents of banks is restricted by APS 222. APS 222 is a prudential standard issued by the Australian banking regulator that aims to ensure that Australian banks are not exposed to excessive risk as a result of their associations and dealings with related entities. APS 222 requires each Australian bank to monitor potential contagion risk between itself and other members of its group, to meet minimum requirements with respect to group risk management and dealings with related entities, and to adhere to prudential limits on intragroup exposure. Since January 2013, the Australian banking regulator has been able to set specific limits on the ultimate parent bank’s exposure to related entities.
VI CONTROL OF BANKS AND TRANSFERS OF BANKING BUSINESS
i Control regime
The Reserve Bank does not seek to regulate the owners of registered banks other than, in the course of considering an application for registration, having regard to the ownership structure of the applicant and the standing of the applicant’s owners in the financial markets.
As discussed in Section II, supra, the Reserve Bank is concerned with ensuring that the ownership structure of an applicant incentivises the owners of the bank to monitor the bank’s activities closely, and to influence its behaviour in a way that will maintain or improve the bank’s soundness while retaining sufficient separation between the board and its owners to ensure that, where the interests of the bank and its owners diverge, the directors of the bank act in the best interests of the bank.
The Reserve Bank considers that the standing of the applicant’s owner is likely to have a significant impact on the standing of the applicant itself. Accordingly, an applicant for registration must provide the Reserve Bank with an outline of the parent company’s main activities and areas of expertise, including a list of the jurisdictions in which it is operating, a list of the major shareholders of the parent company and financial accounts for the parent company for the previous three years. The Reserve Bank will also seek the views of the regulator of the parent company in its home jurisdiction where relevant.
The prior written consent of the Reserve Bank is required if a person acquires or increases a ‘significant influence’ in a registered bank other than a registered bank that is incorporated outside New Zealand or, if an unincorporated body, that has its head office or principal place of business outside New Zealand. A ‘significant influence’ is:
- a the ability to directly or indirectly appoint 25 per cent or more of the board of directors (or other persons exercising powers of management, however described) of the registered bank; or
- b a direct or indirect ‘qualifying interest’ in 10 per cent or more of the voting securities issued or allotted by the registered bank (the definition of ‘qualifying interest’ is broad and includes persons having legal or beneficial ownership of the voting securities, as well as lesser or indirect interests such as powers to exercise or control the exercise of voting rights attached to the security, or powers to acquire, dispose of or control the acquisition or disposal of the securities, in each case whether directly or by virtue of any trust, agreement, arrangement or understanding).
When considering an application for consent to an acquisition of or increase to a significant influence in a registered bank, the Reserve Bank will have regard to the same matters as when considering the ownership structure of an applicant and the standing of an applicant’s owners in the financial markets in relation to an application for registration.
In addition, if the person acquiring or increasing the significant influence is an overseas person, the consent of the Overseas Investment Office (as delegated by the relevant ministers) may be required under the Overseas Investment Act 2005. To obtain consent under that Act, an applicant must demonstrate that it has relevant business experience and acumen, that it has financial commitment to the registered bank, and that the persons controlling the applicant are of good character and are not persons of the kind who are not eligible for exemptions or permits under the Immigration Act 2009.
New Zealand’s competition laws may also restrict changes of ownership of a registered bank.
In relation to New Zealand-incorporated banks, the Companies Act 1993 requires certain approvals to be obtained and procedures to be followed if a company (including a bank) provides financial assistance for the purpose of or in connection with the acquisition of shares issued by that company. If a bank provided credit support such as a guarantee or security in connection with acquisition finance obtained by a person acquiring or increasing a significant influence in that bank, that credit support would need to be approved as financial assistance.
ii Transfers of banking business
There are limited ways under New Zealand law in which a registered bank can transfer all or part of its business (including deposits and loan arrangements) to another entity without the consent of the affected customers.
The Companies Act 1993 allows the court, on the application of a company or any shareholder or creditor of a company, to order that a scheme of arrangement be binding on the company and other persons specified in the order (e.g., customers). However, prior to making the final order, the court may make orders requiring meetings of affected persons such as creditors (which would include depositors) to be held for the purpose of obtaining the approval of those persons to the scheme of arrangement. Accordingly, while the consent of each customer may not be required, a certain level of approval of the affected persons would likely be required.
Although unlikely to occur frequently, legislation can be used to transfer or vest all or part of the business of an entity to or in another entity. This process was used in 2006 and 2011 to vest significant parts of the business of a registered bank operating in New Zealand as a branch of an offshore bank in a New Zealand-incorporated subsidiary of that bank. In both cases, the legislation was a private Act of Parliament (that is, initiated by a person other than a Member of Parliament).
The Reserve Bank has also identified that significant acquisitions, investments or business combinations by locally incorporated New Zealand banks have the potential to pose risks to the soundness of the financial system. Accordingly, in December 2011, the Reserve Bank imposed an additional condition of registration on locally incorporated banks relating to significant acquisitions. The condition applies to acquisitions or business combinations for which either the total consideration is equal to or greater than 15 per cent of the banking group’s Tier 1 capital, or the value of the assets acquired is equal to or greater than 15 per cent of the total assets of banking group. The condition requires the bank to notify the Reserve Bank of the intended acquisition or business combination before giving effect to it and, depending on the size of the acquisition, either waiting for a 10-working-day period to elapse during which the Reserve Bank can object to the transaction or (in the case of larger transactions) obtaining a notice of non-objection to the transaction from the Reserve Bank.
The rationale for having a notice of non-objection as opposed to other alternatives outlined by the bank (i.e., prior approval or prior notification) is that the directors of the bank would retain responsibility for the decision on the acquisition, but that the Reserve Bank would have a tool to assess whether there are any risks to the soundness of the financial system that need to be considered.
VII THE YEAR IN REVIEW
According to its most recent Financial Stability Report, the Reserve Bank considers that New Zealand’s financial system remains sound and is operating effectively. The banking system is well capitalised, funding and liquidity buffers are above the required minima, and the sector remains profitable by international standards.3
The Reserve Bank has identified three key risks facing the financial system: volatility in the housing market (particularly in Auckland), continuing high levels of indebtedness in the dairy sector and an increase in bank reliance on offshore funding.
The Reserve Bank periodically evaluates its prudential policies, and is currently undertaking a stock take of the regulatory framework to ensure it meets its objectives efficiently, clearly and consistently. Several initiatives are in progress to better measure and define bank capital adequacy, and a review of the outsourcing policy for banks is being conducted with an exposure draft expected in the first quarter of 2017.
VIII OUTLOOK and CONCLUSIONS
The Reserve Bank expects to progress several reviews during 2017. An exposure draft of the outsourcing policy has been released and the Reserve Bank expects to finalise this policy in the second quarter of 2017. The Reserve Bank is also undertaking a review of all aspects of current bank capital requirements, and public consultation on this is expected to commence in early 2017. In addition, the Reserve Bank will continue to keep a close watch on the housing market. At the request of the Reserve Bank, the government is investigating the addition of debt-to-income ratios to the Bank’s macroprudential toolkit.